Case law

Quality Technology Co. v. Stone & Webster Engineering Co.

745 F. Supp. 1331 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 1, 1990

Burkhart v. Randles, 764 F.2d 1196, 1201 (6th Cir.1985). See also Kendall v. Board of Ed. of Memphis City Sch., 627 F.2d 1, 5 (6th Cir.1980). … Board of Regents, 496 F.2d 322 (6th Cir.1974).

White v. Sherman Financial Group, LLC

984 F. Supp. 2d 841 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 4, 2013

In Hauk v. … In Wadlington v.

Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.

667 F. Supp. 583 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 17, 1987

Carlson v. Highter, 612 F.Supp. 603, 604-605 (D.Tenn.1985). … See Carlson v. Highter, 612 F.Supp. at 605 .

Ford v. Ribicoff

199 F. Supp. 822 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Dec 4, 1961

Rafal v. Flemming, 171 F.Supp. 490 (D.C.Va.1959); MacPherson v. Ewing, 107 F.Supp. 666 (D.C.). … Nierotko v. Social Security *829 Board, 327 U.S. 358 , 66 S.Ct. 637 , 90 L.Ed. 718 . The Act permitted plaintiff to draw $1,-200.00 per year without having deductions made from his Social Security benefits.

Dean v. Herrington

668 F. Supp. 646 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Aug 11, 1987

It is beyond dispute that the TVA Board of Directors has exclusive power to set TVA’s rates, and that the setting of these rates is not subject to judicial review. See Mobil Oil Corp. v. … Allen v.

McCowan v. Tucker

558 F. Supp. 31 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 16, 1982

Pyke, 533 F.2d 331, 332 (6th Cir.1976), citing, Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 578 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). The Supreme Court in Board of Regents v. … See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. at 577 , 92 S.Ct. at 2709 .

Moore

District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 9, 2026

[Brown Dep., Doc. 228-9, at 65:8–9]. … (quoting Brown v. Electrolux Home Prods., Inc., 817 F.3d 1225, 1234 (11th Cir. 2016)).

S.P. ex rel. M.P. v. Knox Cnty. Bd. of Educ.

388 F. Supp. 3d 947 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · May 14, 2019

In R.K. v. Bd. of Educ. 2014 WL 4277482 (E.D. … See Empire Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , 188 F.R.D. 478 , 481 (E.D. Ky. 1999) ; see also Spradlin v. Richard , 572 Fed.

S.P. ex rel. M.P. v. Knox Cnty. Bd. of Educ.

329 F. Supp. 3d 584 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 12, 2018

V. Analysis A. … In R.K. v.

Melton v. Young

328 F. Supp. 88 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 19, 1971

In this regard see Schenck v. … Blackwell v. Issaquena County Board of Education, 363 F.2d 749 (5th Cir. 1966).”

Goodin v. Clinchfield Railroad Company

125 F. Supp. 441 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Oct 21, 1954

v. … In Garner v.

McCleary v. QCHC of Tennessee, PLLC

District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 26, 2025

In West v. … Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104–05 (1976).

Bush v. Johnson

607 F. Supp. 96 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Mar 20, 1985

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). To have a property interest in employment, a person must have more than an abstract need or desire for it. Id. … See, Watts v. Board of Curators, University of Missouri, 495 F.2d 384, 389 (8th Cir.1974).

Volunteer Electric Cooperative v. Tennessee Valley Authority

139 F. Supp. 22 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Dec 29, 1954

Avrick v. Rockmont Envelope Co., 10 Cir., 155 F.2d 568 . … Co. v. Jackson, 7 Cir., 98 F.2d 950 .

Gupton v. Leavitt

575 F. Supp. 2d 874 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 18, 2008

Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401-02 , 91 S.Ct. 1420 , 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971); see also Cutlip v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 25 F.3d 284, 286 (6th Cir.1994); Tra vers. v. … See, e.g., Travers v. Shalala, 20 F.3d 993, 996-98 (9th Cir.1994); Westin v.

Day v. NORTH AMERICAN RAYON CORPORATION

140 F. Supp. 490 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · May 3, 1956

Hood v. State, 187 Tenn. 501 , 216 S.W.2d 14 . In searching for the object of a statute, unity of subject is to be looked to, as to whether the particular statute fits into a unified scheme or system. Brown v. … Friend v. Middle Atlantic Transp. Co., 2 Cir., 153 F.2d 778 ; Osthaus v. Button, 3 Cir., 70 F.2d 392 .

Smallwood v. Cocke Cnty. Gov't

290 F. Supp. 3d 755 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Feb 7, 2018

Claiborne v. Frito-Lay, Inc. , 718 F.Supp. 1319 , 1321 (E.D. Tenn. 1989). And in an at-will employment relationship, "either party [may] terminate [the] relationship with or without cause." Brown v. … The problem for Plaintiff here is that no authority with respect to the creation of civil service boards was ever granted by the state legislature.

Jones v. Hamilton County

891 F. Supp. 2d 870 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Aug 29, 2012

Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). Third, § 1983 plaintiffs may identify a policy of inadequate training or supervision. Thomas, 398 F.3d at 429 . … And in an unpublished opinion, the Ninth Circuit held that a school board’s practice of nearly uniformly praying “in the Name of Jesus” would have violated the Establishment Clause as interpreted by Marsh. Bacus v.

Winter Garden Co. v. United States

263 F. Supp. 590 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 21, 1966

See its opinion in Winter Garden Company v. United States, supra. … See Frozen Food Express v. United States, 219 F.Supp. 131, 139 (D.C.Texas); Willis Shaw Frozen Express, Inc. v. United States, supra.

King v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York

114 F. Supp. 700 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 8, 1953

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. United States, 6 Cir., 201 F.2d 819 . Nevertheless, the Court is of the opinion that in this case the motion to strike should be granted. … Light v. Greenwich Ins. Co., 105 Tenn. 480 , 58 S.W. 851 . See, also, Brockett v. Pipkin, 25 Tenn.App. 1 , 149 S.W.2d 478 . Such is the nature of the contract here in question.