Case law

Mayes v. Teague

341 F. Supp. 254 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Mar 7, 1972

They rely on a statement in Hadley v. … Fortson v.

United States v. Lee

383 F. Supp. 1033 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 20, 1974

In United States v. … See, United States v.

Tobin v. Mason & Dixon Lines, Inc.

102 F. Supp. 466 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Dec 13, 1951

The repair of trailer floors involved the removal of broken or defective parts and installing such parts as cross sills and floor boards. … Brown, also, were essentially the same. These three employees are, accordingly, treated together. Their work in the main was that of carpenters.

Phillips v. United Mine Workers of America, District 19

218 F. Supp. 103 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 1, 1963

See also N.L.R.B. v. Retail Clerks International Association et al. (C.A.9) 243 F.2d 777, 783 ; N.L.R.B. v. Florida Citrus Canners Corp., (C.A. 5) 288 F.2d 630, 639-640 ; Haleston Drug Stores, Inc. v. … United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission, (C.A. 3) 206 F.2d 842 .

Patterson v. United States

233 F. Supp. 447 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Apr 10, 1964

However, as pointed out in an opinion by Judge Brown in the Western District *449 ■of Tennessee, in the ease of Vaughn et al. v. United States v. … Following the case of Irvin v.

United States v. Williams

428 F. Supp. 2d 745 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Apr 17, 2006

Brown knew Defendant by his nickname of Drago. Brown testified two of her friends, who were also under 18 years old and in high school at the time, were involved in the scheme as well. … See United States v.

Cooper v. Rhea County

302 F.R.D. 195 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Aug 6, 2014

Cox v. Treadway, 75 F.3d 230, 240 (6th Cir. 1996); see Aslanidis v. U.S. … Board of Cnty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997).

United States v. Osborne

565 F. Supp. 2d 927 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 23, 2008

Brown file a motion to withdraw, but Mr. Brown also failed to do so. [Doc. 83.] … See Brown v.

Mack v. United Mine Workers

466 F. Supp. 474 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Feb 23, 1978

See Hirsch v. Building & Const. Trades Council, 530 F.2d 298 (3rd Cir. 1976); Accord, Squillacote v. Graphic Arts Intern. Union, AFL-CIO, 540 F.2d 853 (7th Cir. 1976). … Squillacote v. Local 248, Meat and Allied Food Workers, 534 F.2d 735 (7th Cir. 1976); Samoff v. Const. Trades Council of Delaware, 378 F.Supp. 261 (D.Del.1974).

Kentucky Utilities Co. v. Tennessee Valley Authority

237 F. Supp. 502 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Oct 15, 1964

Stark v. Wickard, 321 U.S. 288, 309-310 , 64 S.Ct. 559 , 88 L.Ed. 733 ; National Bank of Detroit v. Wayne Oakland Bank, supra; Civil Aeronautics Board v. Delta Air Lines, 367 U.S. 316 , 81 S.Ct. 1611 , 6 L.Ed.2d 869 . … At a meeting with the TVA Board of Directors, on February 4,1960, the Board advised representatives of Middlesboro,.

Roberts v. Clement

252 F. Supp. 835 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jan 12, 1966

Martin v. … People v.

Cash v. Brooks

906 F. Supp. 450 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Dec 1, 1995

Baker v. Parris, 777 F.Supp. 299 (S.D.N.Y.1991). … Grondin v. Rossington, 690 F.Supp. 200 (S.D.N.Y.1988). V.

Cotton v. Reynolds

812 F. Supp. 121 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Dec 4, 1992

Cleveland Board of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 538 , 105 S.Ct. 1487, 1491 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985). … Brewer v. Chauvin, 938 F.2d 860, 864 (8th Cir.1991). This is in accord with the result reached in an earlier Sixth Circuit ease. Kendall v. Board of Educ., 627 F.2d 1 , 6 (6th Cir.1980).

Wiley Ex Rel. Wiley v. Franklin

468 F. Supp. 133 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Feb 9, 1979

McCollum v. Board of Education, 333 U.S. 203 , 68 S.Ct. 461 , 92 L.Ed. 649 (1948); Abington School District v. Schempp, 374 U.S. 203 , 83 S.Ct. 1560 , 10 L.Ed.2d 844 (1963). … Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 at pp. 15-16 , 67 S.Ct. 504, at pp. 511-512 , 91 L.Ed. 311 . In Illinois ex rel. McCollum v.

Magic Chef, Inc. v. International Molders & Allied Workers Union

581 F. Supp. 772 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Aug 8, 1983

As stated by Justice Brennan in Franchise Tax Board v. … Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, 315 U.S. 740, 750 , 62 S.Ct. 820, 826 , 86 L.Ed. 1154, 1165 (1942); Youngdahl v. Rainfair, Inc., 355 U.S. 131 , 78 S.Ct. 206 , 2 L.Ed.2d 151 (1957).

Sunstrom v. Schering-Plough Corp.

856 F. Supp. 1265 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Feb 16, 1994

Brown agreed with that recommendation, and Jarvis and Wright terminated her. Mr. … See Wooden v. Board of Education of Jefferson County, Kentucky, 931 F.2d 376, 379 (6th Cir.1991).

City of Cowan v. City of Winchester

121 F. Supp. 3d 795 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Aug 3, 2015

Le-Ax Water Dist. v. City of Athens, 346 F.3d 701, 704 (6th Cir.2003); see Village of Grafton v. Rural Lorain Cnty. … No. 7 v.

Cline v. Richards

455 F. Supp. 45 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jan 18, 1978

Federal Courts § 165, p. 366(2), citing, inter alia, Hanna v. Plumer (1965), 380 U.S. 460 , 85 S.Ct. 1136 , 14 L.Ed.2d 8 . … . § 23-3403(a), to a Tennessee medical malpractice review board.

In Re Tennessee Valley Authority Ash Spill Litigation

787 F. Supp. 2d 703 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Mar 24, 2011

Brown, P.E., an expert environmental engineer (the “Brown declaration” and the “Brown affidavit”); (2) an affidavit [Turner, Doc. 46] by Dennis Allen Huckaba, P.E., an expert civil engineer (the “Huckaba affidavit”); and … Plaintiffs in Chamberlain, et al. v. TVA, Case No. 3:09-CV-602, Troutt, et al. v. TVA, Case No. 3:09-CV-603, Brown, et al. v. TVA, Case No. 3:09-CV-604, and Rose, et al. v.

Rosenbaum v. Cummings (In Re Rosenbaum)

150 B.R. 994 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Feb 8, 1993

The confusion regarding concurrent jurisdiction arises from the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. … In addition, Brown is distinguishable on its facts since the state court proceedings in that case were concluded before a bankruptcy petition was ever filed by the debtor. Thus, Rosenbaum's reliance on Helm v.