Case law

Taylor v. City of Knoxville

566 F. Supp. 925 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · May 25, 1983

Hynes v. Mayor of Oradell, supra. A city may also place reasonable time, place and manner restrictions on religious solicitations. Heffron v. … Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 394 U.S. 147, 151 , 89 S.Ct. 935 , 22 L.Ed.2d 162 (1969). The Board’s function, therefore, exceeds the ministerial role contemplated by the Supreme Court in Cantwell v.

Brice v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

894 F. Supp. 323 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 30, 1994

Many judicial opinions remark on the narrowness of judicial review of decisions of the National Railroad Adjustment Board and of system, group, or regional boards such as Public Law Board No. 5015. See, e.g., Jones v. … Meeks v.

United States v. Anderson County, Tenn.

547 F. Supp. 18 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Apr 15, 1982

In United States v. … The Court relied on the abstention doctrines set forth in Railroad Commission v. Pullman Co., 312 U.S. 496 , 61 S.Ct. 643 , 85 L.Ed. 971 (1941) and Younger v.

In Re Southeastern Milk Antitrust Litigation

801 F. Supp. 2d 705 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jul 14, 2011

DFA is owned by its dairy farmer members and governed by a board of directors comprised of dairy farmer members. … Brown, 783 F.2d at 646 .

Flotemersch v. Bedford County General Hospital

69 F.R.D. 556 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Dec 3, 1975

See Mitchell v. White Consolidated, C.A.7th (1949), 177 F.2d 500, 503 [3], certiorari denied (1950), 339 U.S. 913 , 70 S.Ct. 574 , 94 L.Ed. 1339 ; Weir v. … Jones v. Union Guano Co. (1924), 264 U.S. 171, 181 , 44 S.Ct. 280 , 68 L.Ed. 623, 628 (headnote 2).

In Re Southeastern Milk Antitrust Litigation

666 F. Supp. 2d 908 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 25, 2009

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission, 710 F.2d 1165, 1179 (6th Cir.1983). The public right of access, however, is not absolute. Id. … Brown & Williamson, 710 F.2d at 1177-79 ; Meyer Goldberg, 823 F.2d at 163 . While sealing orders are permissible under the First Amendment, Dow Chemical Co. v.

Order of Railway Conductors & Brakemen v. Clinchfield Railroad

278 F. Supp. 322 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 10, 1967

Batts v. … Cl., etc. v. Norfolk So. Ry. Co., supra; McCormick v.

Cumberland Portland Cement Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

140 F. Supp. 739 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 17, 1953

Coram, 211 U.S. 335, 336, 368 , 29 S.Ct. 92 , 53 L.Ed. 208 ; Walker v. Brown, 165 U.S. 654 , 17 S.Ct. 453 , 41 L.Ed. 865 ; Johnson v. Root Mfg. Co., 241 U.S. 160 , 36 S.Ct. 520 , 60 L.Ed. 934 ; Sexton v. … Johnson v. Root Mfg. Co., supra; Walker v. Brown, supra; Walton Land & Timber Co. v. Runyan, 5 Cir., 269 F. 128 ; In re Cramond, 145 F. 966 . Assignments to enable a debt- or to continue in business are valid.

Totton v. Local 43 of United Ass'n

293 F. Supp. 673 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Dec 13, 1966

In the case of United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO v. … United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO v. American Mfg. Co., 363 U.S. 565 , 80 S.Ct. 1343 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1403 ; United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co., supra; and United Steel Workers of America v.

Transportation-Communication Employees Union v. Harriman & Northeastern Railroad

270 F. Supp. 582 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Mar 30, 1967

Again we note the conclusiveness accorded the Board’s findings and order. The matter of the effect to be accorded the amendments in pending cases came up in Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen et al. v. … Carpenter v. Wabash Ry., 309 U.S. 23, 26, 27 , 60 S.Ct. 416 , 84 L.Ed. 558 . See also Hines v. Davidowitz, 312 U.S. 52 , 61 S.Ct. 399 , 85 L.Ed. 581 ; American Foundries v.

Craigmiles v. Giles

110 F. Supp. 2d 658 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Aug 21, 2000

The Act establishes a seven-member board, the Board of Funeral Directors and Embalmers (“Funeral Board”) which is charged with administering the Act. … applying to funeral directors, the board shall, upon receipt of a fee as set by the board, issue to the applicant a license to practice funeral directing. *661 TENN.

Jones v. State of Tennessee

District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jul 6, 2023

On December 28, 2021, Plaintiff appealed Defendant Cobble’s decision and presented arguments to the Grievance Board, comprised of Defendants Brown and Koczwara [Id. ¶¶ 32, 33]. … See, e.g., Brown v.

Hunley v. Cohen

288 F. Supp. 537 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Aug 15, 1968

Brown examined his chest, spine, hands and knees. All bone structures were normal and no evidence of arthritis was found. However, Dr. Brown did find arteriosclerosis. Doctor E. K. … Moon v. Celebrezze, 340 F.2d 926 (C.A. 7, 1965); Celebrezze v. Bolas, 316 F.2d 498 (C.A. 8, 1963); Johns v. Celebrezze, 272 F.Supp. 533 (M.D.Tenn., 1967). King v.

Bernos Coal Co. v. Lujan

739 F. Supp. 1133 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 6, 1989

He also found that the OSM was not privy to the state board’s actions. In the alternative, he held that even if Magistrate Murrian had been correct that these doctrines applied in Excello v. … See U.S. v. Stauffer Chemical Co., 464 U.S. 165 , 104 S.Ct. 575 , 78 L.Ed.2d 388 (1984).

Williams v. Hoffmeister

520 F. Supp. 521 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 23, 1981

Meadows v. Ford Motor Co., 510 F.2d 939 (6th Cir. 1975). Plaintiff relies also on a Fourth Circuit case, E.E.O.C. v. … Gillin v. Federal Paper Board Co., Inc., 479 F.2d 97, 101 (2d Cir. 1973).

Kelley v. Apria Healthcare, LLC

232 F. Supp. 3d 983 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Feb 3, 2017

Apria’s argument relies on Brown v. Sun Healthcar e Group, Inc., 476 F.Supp.2d 848 (E.D. Tenn. 2007) (Varían, C.J.), and Conley v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc., 236 S.W.3d 713 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). … Brown, 476 F.Supp.2d at 851-52 ; Conley, 236 *1003 S.W.3d at 733 . Both cases, however, were limited to federal nursing-home regulations. Further, Brown and Conley were medical malpractice actions.

Smith v. Ellington

334 F. Supp. 90 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Apr 19, 1971

Sellers v. Regents of the University of California, 432 F.2d 493 (1970); Cox v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 559 , 85 S.Ct. 476 , 13 L.Ed.2d 487 (1965); Cameron v. Johnson, 390 U.S. 611 , 88 S.Ct. 1335 , 20 L.Ed.2d 182 (1968). … See Boyle v. Landry, 401 U.S. 77 , 91 S.Ct. 758 , 27 L.Ed.2d 696, 1971 . 1 . 1.

United States v. Williams

428 F. Supp. 2d 745 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Apr 17, 2006

Brown knew Defendant by his nickname of Drago. Brown testified two of her friends, who were also under 18 years old and in high school at the time, were involved in the scheme as well. … See United States v.

Shuler v. Wood

198 F. Supp. 801 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Oct 24, 1961

Browning v. City of Waycross, 233 U.S. 16 , 34 S.Ct. 578 , 58 L.Ed. 828 . … See, also, Palm Vacuum Cleaner Co. v. Bjornstad, 136 Minn. 38 , 161 N.W. 215 , L.R.A. 1917C, 1012 , and note thereto. It will be seen from the cases cited in the note that the rule stated in Browning v.

Vann Ex Rel. Vann v. Stewart

445 F. Supp. 2d 882 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 5, 2006

Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565, 572-73 , 95 S.Ct. 729 , 42 L.Ed.2d 725 (1975) (quoting Bd. of Regents v. … Compare, e.g., Killion v. Franklin Reg’l Sch.