Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstned

1,717 results

0.32s

  • Frazier v. City of Chattanooga

    151 F. Supp. 3d 830 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 23, 2015

    Welch v. Brown, 551 Fed.Appx. 804, 810 (6th Cir.2014) (quoting Energy Reserves Grp., Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co., 459 U.S. 400, 411-12 , 103 S.Ct. 697 , 74 L.Ed.2d 569 (1983)). … Brown v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • United States v. Lee

    435 F. Supp. 974 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Dec 28, 1976

    Of course, he “ * * * could not very well possess the firearm without receiving it. * * * ” United States v. Brown, C.A. 6th (1973), 472 F.2d 1181, 1182 . Mr. … Lee was not at the time he attempted to board the aforementioned aircraft a law enforcement officer or otherwise authorized under regulations issued by the administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency to board or to carry

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Carver v. Veterans Administration

    455 F. Supp. 544 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 15, 1978

    The Supreme Court recently held that 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16 “ * * * provides the exclusive judicial remedy for claims of discrimination in federal employment. * * * ” Brown v. … See: 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16(c); Brown v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Resor v. Graves

    108 F. Supp. 2d 929 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jul 27, 2000

    In support of its motion, defendant relies upon the case of Brown v. … Defendant Doe relies upon the case of Brown v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Phillips v. Local No. 662, Radio & Television Engineers

    192 F. Supp. 643 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jul 19, 1960

    The merits of the controversy rest in the Board with the right of a losing party to go into the courts. … In this respect, it would appear there is probable cause sufficient to warrant the injunction and full investigation to be made by the Board to determine the issue on its merits.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Gray v. University of Tennessee

    97 F. Supp. 463 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Apr 20, 1951

    Sipuel v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma et al., 332 U.S. 631 , 68 S.Ct. 299 , 92 L.Ed. 247 . In the holding in McLaurin v. … Sipuel v. Board of Regents [of the University of Oklahoma], 1948, 332 U.S. 631, 633 , 68 S.Ct. 299 , 92 L.Ed. 247 .”

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ford v. Wells

    347 F. Supp. 1026 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · May 18, 1972

    As said by the Supreme Court in Pierson [v. … Jack Brown. When Mr. Brown appeared at the preliminary hearing for Mr. Ford afterward, Mr. Brown was arrested for interfering with an officer in the performance of his duty. This charge against Mr.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Stone

    339 F. Supp. 1298 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Dec 15, 1971

    Basista v. Weir, C.A.3d (1965), 340 F.2d 74, 79 [3]. … Brown v. Brown, C.A.9th (1966), 368 F.2d 992, 993 [5], certiorari denied (1966), 385 U.S. 868 , 87 S.Ct. 133 , 17 L.Ed.2d 95 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • DEFOE, EX REL. DEFOE v. Spiva

    650 F. Supp. 2d 811 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Aug 11, 2009

    See Brown v. Raymond Corp., 432 F.3d *819 640, 649 (6th Cir.2005) (citing Celotex Corp., 477 U.S. at 326 , 106 S.Ct. 2548 ). … Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. Dist., 393 U.S. 503, 506 , 89 S.Ct. 733 , 21 L.Ed.2d 731 (1969); see also Hazelwood Sch. Dist. v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260, 266 , 108 S.Ct. 562 , 98 L.Ed.2d 592 (1988); Barr v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Barr

    373 F. Supp. 740 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 12, 1973

    Board of Regents v. Roth, supra; Perry v. Sindermann, supra; Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 , 90 S.Ct. 1011 , 25 L.Ed.2d 287 (1970); Slochower v. … (Board of Regents v. Roth, supra; Perry v. Sindermann, supra ; Orr v. Thorpe, 427 F.2d 1129 (5th Cir. 1970); Bennett v. Gravelle, 323 F.Supp. 203 (D.Md.1971)).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Coe v. Bogart

    377 F. Supp. 310 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Apr 3, 1974

    The right of plaintiff to a due process hearing before a transfer is governed in this instance by Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972), and Perry v. … State v. Yoakum, 201 Tenn. 180 , 297 S.W.2d 635 ; State ex rel. Taylor v. Rasnake, 209 Tenn. 229 , 352 S.W.2d 427 ; Blair et al v. Mayo, et al., 224 Tenn. 108 , 450 S.W.2d 582 . In State ex rel. Pemberton v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Switchmen's Union of North America v. Clinchfield Railroad

    310 F. Supp. 606 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · May 7, 1969

    United Steelworkers of America v. American Mfg. … . * * *” Switchmen’s Union of North America v. National Mediation Board (1943), 320 U.S. 297, 302 , 64 S. Ct. 95, 98 , 88 L.Ed. 61, 65 (headnote 5).

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Operations Management International, Inc. v. Tengasco, Inc.

    35 F. Supp. 2d 1052 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Feb 3, 1999

    Brown Oil Co. v. Johnson, 689 S.W.2d 149, 151 (Tenn.1985). I cannot agree with OMI that the Teaming Agreement was illusory or simply an agreement to agree. … In the case of Bill Brown Construction Co. v. Glens Falls Ins.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Browning v. Rohm & Haas Tennessee, Inc.

    16 F. Supp. 2d 896 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Aug 6, 1998

    See Wooden v. Board of Educ. of Jefferson County, 931 F.2d 376, 378 (6th Cir.1991). “This proof ‘in effect creates a presumption that the employer unlawfully discriminated against the employee.’” … See Wrenn v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Mid-South Cogeneration, Inc. v. Tennessee Valley Authority

    926 F. Supp. 1327 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Mar 18, 1996

    Brown Company, Inc. v. … Allen Orchards v. United States, 749 F.2d 1571, 1575 (Fed.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 818 , 106 S.Ct. 64 , 88 L.Ed.2d 52 (1985) (citations omitted); see also H. Landau & Company v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Lorain Division, Koehring Co. v. Walldorff

    522 F. Supp. 408 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 17, 1981

    In Leedom v. … Kyne, supra, 358 U.S. at 188 , 79 S.Ct. at 183 , 3 L.Ed.2d at 214 , so as to confer jurisdiction upon this Court to intervene in the Board’s decertification processes. Confederated Independent Unions v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McCraw v. United Ass'n of Journeymen and Apprentices of Plumbing & Pipe Fitting Industry

    216 F. Supp. 655 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Feb 11, 1963

    Moreover, as pointed out in the case of Detroy v. … Rekant v. Shochtay-Gasos Union, D.C., 205 F.Supp. 284 ; Lankford v. I. B. E. W., D.C., 196 F.Supp. 661 .

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • International Ass'n of Tool Craftsmen & Its Local No. 20 v. Miller

    389 F. Supp. 1078 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 18, 1974

    See Teamsters, Local 690 v. NLRB, 375 F.2d 966, 973-74 (9th Cir. 1967); NLRB v. … These decisions are normally reviewable only when the dispute results in a Board finding that an unfair labor practice has been committed. Boire v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Pascual v. Anchor Advanced Products, Inc.

    819 F. Supp. 728 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Apr 30, 1993

    Galbraith v. Northern Telecom, Inc., 944 F.2d 275, 281 (6th Cir.1991), citing Shah v. General Electric Co., 816 F.2d 264, 270 (6th Cir.1987). … In view of the Sixth Circuit’s holding in Vogel v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Langer v. The Individual Members of the Tennessee Board of Law Examinerss

    District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Sep 11, 2023

    See Goldfarb v. Va. … See Anderson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.