Case law

Sequoyah v. Tennessee Valley Authority

480 F. Supp. 608 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 2, 1979

Wooley v. Maynard, 430 U.S. 705 , 97 S.Ct. 1428 , 51 L.Ed.2d 752 (1977); Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 , 92 S.Ct. 1526 , 32 L.Ed.2d 15 (1972); Board of Education v. … Schempp, 374 U.S. 203, 223 , 83 S.Ct. 1560 , 10 L.Ed.2d 844 (1963); Torcaso v. Watkins, 367 U.S. 488 , 81 S.Ct. 1680 , 6 L.Ed.2d 982 (1961); Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U.S. 599 , 81 S.Ct. 1144 , 6 L.Ed.2d 563 (1961).

Elliott v. Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc.

61 F. Supp. 2d 745 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jan 25, 1999

In light of the fact that the Long Term Disability Plan is not funded by Lockheed, but instead is funded by the DOE, there is no “inherent conflict” presented in this case as was presented in Brown v. … See e.g., Brown v.

James v. Tennessee Valley Authority

538 F. Supp. 704 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Apr 22, 1982

This question was raised in Boles v. … Image of Greater San Antonio v. Brown, 570 F.2d 517, 522 (5th Cir. 1978); Breckinridge v. Rumsfeld, 537 F.2d 864 (6th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1061 , 97 S.Ct. 785 , 50 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977).

Abernathy v. Tiller

243 F. Supp. 570 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · May 16, 1965

Brown. Stamm v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company, D.C.Mo. (1958), 129 F.Supp. 719, 721 [3, 4]. So long as Mrs. Brown remains a party defendant, the removal of this action, at least, is premature. … Thomson v. Gaskill (1942), 315 U.S. 442 , 62 S.Ct. 673 , 86 L.Ed. 951 .

Etherton v. United States

278 F. Supp. 568 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Mar 21, 1967

Brown (1893), 148 U.S. 615 , 13 S.Ct. 672 , 37 L.Ed. 582, 585 . … Rutherford Food Corp. v.

Gooden v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America

181 F. Supp. 3d 465 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Mar 30, 2016

Brown v. Paul Revere Life Ins. Co. One of the earliest and most frequently cited cases to state that a premium discount constitutes , a contribution under the safe harbor is Brown v. Paul Revere Life Ins. Co., No. … For the same reasons, the Court finds unpersuasive the line of cases following Brown without analysis of its theoretical foundations. E.g., McCann v. Unum Provident, 921 F.Supp.2d 353, 366 (D.N.J. 2013); Healy v. Minn.

Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Webb

464 F. Supp. 520 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Dec 21, 1978

Grandway Credit Corp. v. Brown, 295 So.2d 714 (Fla.App.1974); Charter Finance Co. v. Henderson, 60 Ill.2d 323 , 326 N.E.2d 372 (1975). … Word v. Morgan Co., 37 Tenn. 35, 37 (1857).

Day v. Southern Electrical Retirement Fund Board of Trustees (TV1)

District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Nov 24, 2020

) SOUTHERN ELECTRICAL ) RETIREMENT FUND ) BOARD … (citing Ravencraft v. UNUM Life Ins. Co. of Am., 212 F.3d 341, 344 (6th Cir. 2000))); Weiner v. Klais & Co., 108 F.3d 86, 91 (6th Cir. 1997).

In re L. W. Birmingham & Son Co.

1 F.2d 511 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Apr 16, 1924

Rep. 268; Keyes v. Davis (D. C.) 231 Fed. 688 , 36 Am. Bankr. Rep. 884; Wintermote v. MacLafferty, 233 Fed. 95 , 147 C. C. A. 165 , 37 Am. Bankr. Rep. 425. … In Cary v. International Agricultural Corporation (D.

Byrge ex rel. Estate v. Premium Coal Co.

301 F. Supp. 3d 785 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Mar 31, 2017

See Navalo v. … Brown , 376 F.3d 245 , 249 (4th Cir. 2004) ("Further, the Court noted that § 914(f)"does not contain the word fine or penalty, and it directs payment to the injured employee."); see also Tahara v.

United States v. Kelley

596 F. Supp. 2d 1132 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jan 9, 2009

In United States v. … Alfano, 838 F.2d at 163 (citing United States v. Brown, 761 F.2d 1272, 1275 (9th Cir.1985)).

Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. HVAC, Inc.

679 F. Supp. 2d 863 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Dec 30, 2009

The complaint in this state court action alleges that Defendant Greene County Board of Education (“Board”) ordered environmental testing of the school to take place in October 2003 and then contracted with HVAC to remove … Stough v. Mayville Cmty. Sch., 138 F.3d 612 , 614 (6th Cir.1998); Wilson v. City of Zanesville, 954 F.2d 349, 351 (6th Cir.1992); Carver v. Bunch, 946 F.2d 451, 454-55 (6th Cir.1991).

Wanamaker v. Lawson

871 F. Supp. 2d 735 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · May 14, 2012

In Agre v. … The Court listed those cases for the parties, along with two early cases reaching the opposite conclusion, Owen v. Crop Hail Mgmt., 841 F.Supp. 297 (W.D.Mo.1994) and Brown v.

Fitzpatrick v. Law Solutions Chi., LLC

584 B.R. 203 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Mar 21, 2018

Mut. of Ohio v. deSoto , 245 F.3d at 567-68. Without question, Doe, Heuser, Solis, Brown, and Sheehan have sufficient minimum contacts with the United States. … See Haile v.

Kelly v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry.

75 F. Supp. 737 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jan 15, 1948

Therefore, the action of the Adjustment Board is not merely advisory. Elgin, J. & E. R. Co. v. Burley, 325 U.S. 711 , 65 S.Ct. 1282 , 89 L.Ed. 1886 . … Switchmen’s Union of North America et al. v. National Mediation Board et al., 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 ; General Committee, etc., v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R.

BML Investment v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

732 F. Supp. 828 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Mar 10, 1989

Brown also sent to Mr. … Brown’s cover letter to Mr.

Shipwash v. United Airlines, Inc.

28 F. Supp. 3d 740 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 18, 2014

Trau-Med of Am., Inc. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 71 S.W.3d 691, 703 (Tenn.2002) (citing Brown v. Birman Managed Care, Inc., 42 S.W.3d 62, 67 (Tenn.2001)). … Brown v. Mapco Exp., Inc., 393 S.W.3d 696, 703 (Tenn.Ct.App.2012) (quoting Doe v. Catholic Bishop for Diocese of Memphis, 306 S.W.3d 712, 717 (Tenn.Ct.App.2008)).

United States v. Harmon

317 F. Supp. 923 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jun 11, 1970

United States v. Celedonia, 95 F.Supp. 228 (W. D.Pa.1951) citing cases; also see, Johnson v. United States, 333 U.S. 10 , 68 S.Ct. 367 , 92 L.Ed. 436 (1948). … Steele v. United States No. 1, 267 U.S. 498, 503 , 45 S.Ct. 414, 416 , 69 L.Ed. 757 ; Fine v. United States, 207 F.2d 324 (C.A.6, 1954) applying Steele.

McBride v. Tennessee Valley Authority

395 F. Supp. 1181 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Jul 31, 1974

See also Vantrease v. United States, 400 F.2d 853 (6th Cir. 1968); Flippo v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 486 F.2d 612 (5th Cir. 1973); Posey v. … Baum v. Zuckert, 342 F.2d 145 (6th Cir. 1965); Fass v. Ruegg, 379 F.2d 216 (6th Cir. 1967). The motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of the defendant the T. V.A. will be sustained.

United States v. Lee

435 F. Supp. 974 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Dec 28, 1976

Of course, he “ * * * could not very well possess the firearm without receiving it. * * * ” United States v. Brown, C.A. 6th (1973), 472 F.2d 1181, 1182 . Mr. … Lee was not at the time he attempted to board the aforementioned aircraft a law enforcement officer or otherwise authorized under regulations issued by the administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency to board or to carry