Case law

Alardin v. State

491 S.W.2d 872 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 21, 1973

Hunter v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 481 S.W.2d 806 ; Browning v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 488 S.W. 2d 801 ; Cazares v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 488 S.W.2d 110 . … Brown v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 460 S.W.2d 925 ; Crestfield v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 471 S.W. 2d 50 ; 5 Tex.Jur.2d 61, Sec. 39.

Getters v. State

170 Tex. Crim. 331 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 2, 1960

Appellant was convicted as a second offender under the Uniform Narcotic Drug Act, Art. 725b, V. A. P. … Reliance is had upon Pelham v. State, 164 Tex. Cr. R. 226 , 298 S.

Ex Parte Hawkins

6 S.W.3d 554 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 8, 1999

As to double jeopardy law, the Crosby Court rejected the Blockburger test because two distinct statutory provisions were not involved. 4 It relied on Brown v. … Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 165 [, 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 ] (1977). But once Congress has defined a statutory offense by its prescription of the “allowable unit of prosecution,” United States v.

Berry v. State

233 S.W.3d 847 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 23, 2007

Johnson v. State, 23 S.W.3d 1, 11 (Tex.Crim.App.2000). In Watson v. … See, e.g., Muniz v.

Hensarling v. State

829 S.W.2d 168 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 25, 1992

Brown v. Lynaugh, 843 F.2d 849 (5th Cir.1988). In Brown v. … Meraz v. State, 714 S.W.2d 108, 113 (Tex.Cr.App. 1986). [3] In Howeth v.

Rodriguez v. State

472 S.W.2d 517 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 9, 1971

On March 24, 1971, Judge Brown acknowledged the letter and told appellant that Judge Preston Dial had tried the case and would have to handle this matter. … action and if so, the trial court should take steps to provide effective aid of counsel on appeal and conduct such proceedings in that court as may be required under the provisions of Art. 40.09, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.; Steel v.

Mayes v. State

472 S.W.2d 528 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 9, 1971

, 1970, Narcotic Officers executed search warrants on this apartment, recovering: “two *529 packets of Top Brand cigarette papers, * * * one containing one #5 gelatin cap and the other containing a white powder; * * * a brown … State, Tex.Cr.App., 467 S.W.2d 428 ; Tinsley v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 461 S.W.2d 605 . The state is not restricted in its proof because of a plea of guilty. Alvarez v. State, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 384 , 264 S.W.2d 110 .

Ex Parte Brown

158 S.W.3d 449 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 12, 2005

In Hull v. … Brown v. State, No. 05-90-003 06-CR (Tex. App.-Dallas, filed February 26, 1991, pet. ref'd). . See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). .

Johnson v. State

629 S.W.2d 731 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 10, 1981

In Evans v. … In Ward v. State, 591 S.W.2d 810 (Tex.Cr.App.1978), the Court, quoting from Brown v.

Ex Parte Rogers

632 S.W.2d 748 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 26, 1982

v. … Brown v. Ohio, supra, 432 U.S. at n. 6, 166-167, 97 S.Ct. at n. 6, 2226.

McGregor, Edward George

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 12, 2019

Id. at 866 (false evidence claim); United States v. … Wearry v. Cain, ___ U.S. ___, 136 S.Ct. 1002, 1006 n. 6 (2016) (per curiam).

Staten v. State

93 Tex. Crim. 265 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 20, 1922

Brown and S. B. Hall, who were tendered and accepted as sureties; and thereupon the said John Staten, as principal, and the said R. A. Hall, Joe S. Brown and S. B. … Westbrook v. State, 88 Texas Crim. Rep., 466 , 227 S. W. Rep., 1104 ; Sanders v. State, 83 Texas Crim. Rep., 110 , 201 S. W. Rep., 411 ; Lopez v. State, 85 Texas Crim. Rep., 402 , 212 S. W. Rep., 954 ; Sauer v.

Merriweather v. State

501 S.W.2d 887 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 28, 1973

While the inarticulate hunch, suspicion, or good faith of an arresting officer is insufficient to constitute probable cause, Sibron v. New York, supra; Brown v. … Under our holding in Brown v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 443 S.W.2d 861 , and Green v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 470 S.W.2d 901 , we hold that the information meets the test for determining probable cause.

Balderas v. State

497 S.W.2d 298 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jul 17, 1973

St. and compare Joines v. State, 482 S.W.2d 205 (Tex.Cr.App.1972) and Laval-las v. State, 444 S.W.2d 931 (Tex.Cr.App. 1969). … See Saldana v. State, 493 S. W.2d 778 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Marr v. State, 487 S.W.2d 93 (Tex.Cr.App.1972) and Nichol v. State, 480 S.W.2d 222 (Tex. Cr.App.1972). Both grounds of error are overruled.

Gomez v. State

162 Tex. Crim. 30 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 18, 1955

The case of Armstrong v. … Well, it was a cigarette in brown paper. “Q. It was a cigarette in brown paper. Was it a marijuana cigarette? A. I don’t know. “Q. Well, did you intend to give him a marijuana cigarette? A. Yes, sir. “Q.

Craig v. State

126 Tex. Crim. 456 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 23, 1934

Frank Brown v. The State, ^Opinion No. 16,688, this day delivered, is a companion case. The facts here are the same as those proven upon the trial of Frank Brown. … In Brown’s Case we held that the trial court committed error in failing to charge on circumstantial evidence.

Ribble v. State

503 S.W.2d 551 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 16, 1974

Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, supra. … Valerio v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 494 S.W.2d 892 ; Weatherly v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 477 S.W.2d 572 ; Brown v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 443 S.W.2d 261 .

Baugus v. State

87 Tex. Crim. 551 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 25, 1920

Pharr v. State, 7 Texas Crim. App., 442; Pratt v. State, 50 Texas Crim. Rep., 227 . … Pickens v. State, 86 Texas Crim. Rep., 657 , 218 S. W. Rep., 756.

Baker v. State

47 Tex. Crim. 482 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 17, 1904

Co. v. Lowe, 114 U. S., 525 . … Co. v.

Brown, Frederick L.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 3, 2021

BROWN, Appellant v. … BROWN ― 3 unavailable. In my view the court of appeals erred to find this part of Appellant’s complaint to be forfeited. Brown v. State, No. 06-19-00082-CR, 2019 WL 6334707, at *3 n.5 (Tex App.