Case law

Teem v. State

79 Tex. Crim. 285 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 1, 1916

The law provides for a medical board of eleven men, learned in medicine, hut no school shall have a majority on the board. (R. S., art. 5733.) This article also prescribes their otherAequisites. … Brown v. State, 73 Texas Crim. Rep., 574 ; Hughes v. State, 67 Texas Crim. Rep., 333 , 149 S. W. Rep., 173 ; Golden v. State, 66 Texas Crim. Rep., 262 , 146 S. W. Rep., 945 ; Perkins v. State,v 65 Texas Crim..

Williams v. State

165 Tex. Crim. 202 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 19, 1957

P.C., Sec. 523; Thomas v. State, 18 Crim. App. 213; Hofheintz v. State, 45 Texas Cr. Rep. 117 , 74 S.W. 310 . Appellant cites Brown v. State, 139 Texas Cr. Rep. 332 , 140 S.W. 2d 449 . … Insofar as the Brown case may be understood to so hold, it is overruled. Appellant’s next complaint relates to the following.

Taylor v. State

109 Tex. Crim. 323 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 28, 1928

C., Sec. 2452; Brown v. State, 125 S. W. 915 . Where positive or direct proof as to want of consent is available, circumstances alone cannot be resorted to. Brown v. State, supra. … Meredith v. State, 211 S. W. 227 ; Brown v. State, supra. However, a conviction cannot stand unless the evidence relative to the want of consent is sufficient to overcome the presumption of innocence.

Coleman, Alias v. State

108 Tex. Crim. 323 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 30, 1927

See Burns v. State, supra., and cases collated in Vernon’s Tex. C. C. P., Vol. 3, Art. 753, note 25, pp. 14 and 15; also p. 29, Subd. 32, and p. 30, Subd. 33; also Viser v. State, 98 Tex. Crim. Rep. 201; Ross v. … P., 1925, Vol. 3, p. 33, Subd. 35; also *326 Holloway v. State, 94 Tex. Crim. Rep. 270; Freeman v. State, 95 Tex. Crim. Rep. 515; Mims v. State, 88 Tex. Crim. Rep. 419; Berry v. State, 87 Tex. Crim. Rep. 559; Ray v.

Ex Parte Segars

32 Tex. Crim. 553 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 7, 1894

In Oshe v. … See, also, State v. Brewster, 39 Ohio St., 653 ; McKibben v. Lester, 9 Ohio St., 628 ; Blakemore v. Dolan, 50 Ind., 194 .

Mitchell v. State

117 Tex. Crim. 78 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 29, 1931

W., 1051 , and Moray v. State, 61 Texas Crim. Rep., 549 , 135 S. W., 569 . It may be thought that in Brown v. State, 58 Texas Crim. Rep., 336 , 125 S. W., 915 , a different rule is announced. … Under the facts of that case the rule announced in Brown’s case was thought applicable.

Henderson v. State

149 Tex. Crim. 167 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 2, 1946

-Brown were both indicted for the offense. Brown filed a motion for a severance on the 7th day of April, praying that the same be granted and that appellant be tried first. … See Morgan v. State, 97 Tex. Cr. R. 383 ; Goforth v. State, 100 Tex. Cr. R. 442 ; Murrell v. State, 137 Tex. Cr. R. 92 ; Fletcher v. State, 147 S. W. (2d) 233 ; Alford v. State, 157 S. W. (2d) 391 .

Garcia v. State

641 S.W.2d 246 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 10, 1982

Brown were sufficient to satisfy the requirements of Estelle v. Smith, supra. However, because of the disposition we make infra, we shall postpone such a determination. … Since Estelle v.

Smith v. State

45 Tex. Crim. 411 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 14, 1903

In Brown v. State, 11 Texas Crim. App., 451, this expression was held sufficient “to the best of my knowledge and belief.” … But it will be noticed that the Brown case carries the doctrine as far as the statute would permit.

Alderson v. State

53 Tex. Crim. 525 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 20, 1908

The question here raised was decided adversely to the contention of appellant in the case of Warren v. State, 17 Texas Crim. App., 207. … McGaugh, county attorney of Brown County, Texas, and in behalf of said State presents in the County Court of Brown County, Texas, etc.”

Brown, Alfred Dewayne

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 5, 2014

Brown v. State, 270 S.W.3d 564 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). … In allegation V.D.3., applicant claims that the State withheld exculpatory evidence in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963).

Teal, Wilbert James

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 7, 2007

In Duron v. … It alleged whom appellant was hiding (Brown); it stated the offense Brown was hiding from (a felony); it alleged that appellant told police that Brown was not present.

Ware v. State

467 S.W.2d 256 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 5, 1971

The appellant testified during the trial that JoAnn Brown was a narcotic addict and had lived with him at the apartment some time before the search. The Supreme Court of the United States stated in Roviaro v. … In Aguilar v.

Baker v. State

467 S.W.2d 428 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 26, 1971

Mitchell v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 466 S.W.2d 786 ; Marable v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 385 S.W.2d 676 ; Massoletti v. State, 165 Tex. Cr.R. 120, 303 S.W.2d 412 . … This clearly showed appellant’s relationship to the name of Orien Brown Montgomery and the exhibit (check No. 198) was admissible into evidence to show intent, identity, system, scheme and design. Gregory v.

Alberson v. State

54 Tex. Crim. 8 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 6, 1908

This court held in the case of Logan v. State, 40 Texas Crim. Rep., 88 , that this provision of our Code of Criminal Procedure was mandatory. … This testimony was objected to and a reversal of the judgment is sought on the authority of the cases of Harris v. State, 50 Texas Crim. Rep., 411 ; 98 S. W. Rep., 842 , and Parish v. State, 89 S. W. Rep., 830 .

Davis v. State

968 S.W.2d 368 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 10, 1998

Since the rule of construction mentioned in Brown v. … Brown v. State, 716 S.W.2d at 949 .

Hankins v. State

646 S.W.2d 191 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 1, 1983

Richardson v. State, 600 S.W.2d 818 (Tex.Cr.App.1980); Ridyolph v. State, 545 S.W.2d 784 (Tex.Cr.App.1977); Swift v. State, 509 S.W.2d 586 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Corbett v. State, 493 S.W.2d 940 (Tex.Cr. App.1973); Steel v. … Compare also King v.

Morgan v. State

34 Tex. Crim. 222 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 13, 1895

The appellant in this case was tried in the District Court of Brown County on an indictment charging him with the murder of one J. C. Lochrey. … Cartwright v. The State 14 Texas Crim. App., 495; Cunningham v. The State, 17 Texas Crim. App., 90; Franklin v. The State, 30 Texas Crim. App., 628.

Word, Michael Brian

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 14, 2006

See Edwards v. … Tansy , 911 F.2d 392, 394-96 (10 th Cir. 1990); United States v. Brown , 571 F.2d 980, 984-87 , 986 n.5 (6 th Cir. 1978); United States v. Alper , 449 F.2d 1223, 1230-34 (3 rd Cir. 1971). 10.

Martinez, Jesse Adrian

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 14, 2021

The court of appeals held that the taint was sufficiently attenuated under Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 (1975), and affirmed the trial court. Martinez v. … The court of appeals analyzed the four factors from Brown v.