Case law

Ex Parte Peterson

738 S.W.2d 688 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 21, 1987

Illinois v. Vitale, 447 U.S. 410 , 100 S.Ct. 2260 , 65 L.Ed.2d 228 (1980); Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977); North Carolina v. … In Brown v.

Gomez v. State

486 S.W.2d 338 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 8, 1972

See Robinson v. State, Tex.Cr.R., 458 S.W.2d 812 ; King v. State, Tex.Cr.R., 416 S.W.2d 823 ; Gamez v. State, Tex.Cr.R., 403 S.W.2d 418 ; McKenzie v. State Tex.Cr.R., 390 S.W.2d 281 ; Spriggins v. … Coleman v. State, 481 S.W.2d 872 ; Allen v. State, supra. Appellant’s last grounds of error relate to the court’s failure to grant his requests for a mistrial.

Granato v. State

493 S.W.2d 822 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 28, 1973

Hill v. State, 364 S.W.2d 381 (Tex.Cr.App.); Dennis v. State, 420 S.W.2d 940 (Tex.Cr.App.). … State, 40 Tex.Cr.R. 19 , 28 S.W. 470 ; Pierce v. State, 54 Tex.Cr.R. 424 , 113 S.W. 148 ; Browning v. State, 64 Tex.Cr.R. 148 , 142 S.W. 1 ; Medlock v. State, 108 Tex.Cr.R. 274 , 1 S.W.2d 308 ; Davis v.

Brown, David Earl

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 18, 2014

PD-1723-12 DAVID EARL BROWN, Appellant v. … State v. Brown, 393 S.W.3d 308 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2012). This decision remained unchanged after rehearing. State v. Brown, 393 S.W.3d 308, 315 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2012) (op. on reh’g).

Joubert v. State

235 S.W.3d 729 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 3, 2007

Glaspie was to act as a lookout while the appellant and Brown went inside. They drove to the business the next morning. The owner pulled up as the appellant and Brown were approaching. … Morris v. State, 940 S.W.2d 610, 613 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996). 26 . See Bolender v.

Green v. State

470 S.W.2d 901 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 23, 1971

Art. 14.04 V.A.C.C.P.; Brown v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 443 S.W.2d 261 . The test for determining probable cause in this type of situation is the information known to the officer who requests another to make an arrest. … Brown v. State, supra.

Yzaguirre, Jay Paul

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 27, 2013

In Malik, we discussed the case of Brown v. … (emphasis in Brown). 20 See Benson v. State, 661 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. Crim. App. 1982)(op. on State’s second motion for reh’g); Boozer v. State, 717 S.W.2d 608 (Tex. Crim.

Cortinas v. State

571 S.W.2d 932 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 18, 1978

Ceniceros v. State, supra; Brown v. State, supra. … Ceniceros v. State, supra; Brown v. State, supra. Dunn’s search of appellant *934 was unlawful and the knife seized was erroneously received in evidence. Duncan v. State, 549 S.W.2d 730 (Tex.Cr.App.1977). Cf. Perez v.

Dominguez v. State

461 S.W.2d 417 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 6, 1971

The appellant was carrying a brown paper sack and appeared to be intoxicated. … See Moore v. State, 140 Tex.Cr.R. 653 , 146 S.W.2d 762 ; Hermosia v. State, 110 Tex.Cr.R. 8 , 6 S.W.2d 767 ; Jones v. State, 105 Tex.Cr. R. 574, 289 S.W. 684 ; Perry v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 78 S.W. 513 .

Jackson v. State

494 S.W.2d 854 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 23, 1973

In Simmons v. … See Daniels v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 464 S.W.2d 368 . No error is shown.

House v. State

947 S.W.2d 251 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 4, 1997

v. … See Brown, 921 S.W.2d at 229 -30 and at 230 (Keller, J., concurring in the judgment) (mere violation of a disciplinary rule is not a ground for reversal); see also Stanley v.

Hughitt v. State

123 Tex. Crim. 168 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 15, 1933

Brown, the prosecuting witness. Brown testified that the turkey appellant was charged with taking was marked on the end of the outside toe of the left foot. … There was no evidence in the' record that the appellant was ever found in possession of any other turkeys before or after the alleged offense belonging to the complaining witness Brown. In the case of McClain v.

Brown, Ex Parte James Otis

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 12, 2005

Preservation of Error Brown forfeited this claim of error by failing to object at trial. Just three years ago, in Hull v. … App. 2001) ; Thompson v. State , 9 S.W.3d 808, 813-14 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). 18. White , 2004 WL 2179272 *1 n.1. 19. Ante , slip op. at 6. 20. Howard v. State , 830 S.W.2d 785 (Tex.

Smiley v. State

80 Tex. Crim. 280 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 1, 1916

This question has been so thoroughly discussed by this court in Bratton v. State, 34 Texas Crim. Rep., 477 ; White v. State, 33 Texas Crim. Rep., 177 , and Moore v. State, 34 Texas Crim. … himself to be named Tom Brown.

Gibbons v. State

36 Tex. Crim. 469 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 25, 1896

See, Westbrook v. State, 23 Tex. Crim. App., 401. When it contains such a clause, the instrument must correspond with what is alleged to be its purport. … Now, it is true that the instrument purports to be the act of Dixon, but it also purports to be the act of Gibbons, Brown, and ITtt.

Alexander v. State

476 S.W.2d 10 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 26, 1972

Brown v. State, 460 S.W.2d 925 (Tex.Cr.App.1970); Bitela v. State, 463 S.W.2d 738 (Tex.Cr.App. 1971) and 5 Tex.Jur.2d 61, Sec. 39. … No error is shown. 5 Tex.Jur.2d 61, Sec. 39 and Brown v. State, supra. The appellant did not attempt to show that the questions were asked in bad faith. See Keel v. State, 434 S.W.2d 687 (Tex.Cr.App.1968).

Ex Parte Voelkel

517 S.W.2d 291 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 8, 1975

Voelkel v. State, 501 S.W.2d 313 (Tex.Cr.App.1973). … See also: Ex parte Brown, 477 S.W.2d 552 (Tex.Cr.App.1972). The State attempts to distinguish Reynolds and Brown on the basis of the facts of the present case.

Rickman v. State

138 Tex. Crim. 191 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 1, 1939

Earles v. State, 106 S. W. Rep. 138 . … See Shelton v. State, 27 Tex. Crim. App. 443, 11 S. W. Rep. 457 ; also see Harris v. State, 77 S. W.

Southall v. State

77 Tex. Crim. 490 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 13, 1915

Wilshire retired into a restaurant, and Wood, appellant, Wyatt Hunt and Travis Brown got together on the gallery of the restaurant. … Holden v. State, 18 Texas Crim. App., 91; LaGrone v. State, 61 Texas Crim. Rep., 170 , 135 S. W. Rep., 121 .

Ware v. State

124 Tex. Crim. 639 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 15, 1933

Brown, a former wife of appellant, and Helen Roberts, daughter of Mrs. Brown, who testified that appellant had written to Mrs. Brown, then Mrs. … We do not think the case of Carahan v. State, 9 S.