Case law

Alberts v. State

458 S.W.2d 83 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jul 15, 1970

Fuentes v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 410 , 292 S.W.2d 117 ; Studer v. State, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 598 , 265 S.W.2d 833 . … Slusser v. State, 155 Tex.Cr.R. 160 , 232 S.W.2d 727 ; Olsen v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 424 S.W.2d 449 .

Davis v. State

120 Tex. Crim. 114 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 19, 1930

McNeely v. State, 104 Texas Crim. Rep., 263 , 283 S. W., 522 ; Shelburne v. State, 111 Texas Crim. Rep., 182 , 11 S. W. (2d) 519 . … Mann v. State, 102 Texas Crim. Rep., 210 , 277 S. W., 1085 . We find in the record some exceptions to the court’s charge.

Faulkner v. State

537 S.W.2d 742 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 9, 1976

We previously condemned the practice of using form affidavits in Brown v. State, 437 S.W.2d 828 (Tex.Cr.App.1968), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 1089 , 89 S.Ct. 850 , 21 L.Ed.2d 782 . … Phenix v. State, 488 S.W.2d 759 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Chambers v. State, 508 S.W.2d 348 (Tex.Cr.App.1974).

Dillard v. State

550 S.W.2d 45 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 20, 1977

The judgment and sentence control, not the statement of a board of corrections employee. No variance is shown. … After I got out of the car, I left from Eastex and got in with Larry Brown, and then me and Larry Brown went to the Holiday Inn.

Villegas v. State

509 S.W.2d 314 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 24, 1974

Appellants rely upon Aguirre v. State, 31 Tex.Cr.R. 519 , 7 S.W.2d 76 (Tex.Cr.App.1928) ; Manly v. State, 120 Tex.Cr.R. 212 , 48 S.W.2d 256 (Tex.Cr.App.1932); and Brown v. State, 136 Tex.Cr.R. 61 , 124 S. … In Brown, supra the instruments averred the premises to be searched were “the premises of one Brown and some person or persons whose name or names and descriptions” were unknown to the affiants.

Willingham v. State

33 Tex. Crim. 98 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 17, 1894

If Miss Brown is guilty, counsel are correct. … Watson v. The State, 9 Texas Crim. App., 237, and authorities there cited. The testimony is in conflict regarding an important fact. Was the drug administered calomel or salts?

Roderick King v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 5, 2015

Cordero Brown v. State, 06-14-00115-CR, (10 volumes; 5 issues) due April 22, 2015 after one extension . B. Responses to habeas applications: 1. … Saddler v. State, 6-14-00016-CR, March 23, 2015. 2. Pruitt v. State, 6-14-00216-CR, March 30, 2015. 6.

Bland v. State

42 Tex. Crim. 286 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 21, 1900

Simco v. State, 9 Texas Crim. App., 338; Wheelock v. State (Texas Crim. App.), 38 S. W. Rep., 183 . … Brown v. Piper, 91 U. S., 37 , 33 L. Ed., 300 .

Phelps v. State

158 Tex. Crim. 510 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 29, 1953

Brown and Wm. H. Phelps, the Defendants, to leave the county judge’s office and remain outside, in the reception room of such office, which they did. … As supporting such conclusion, it cites the case of State v. Reeder, 79 S.C. 139 , 14 Ann. Cases 968.

McGee v. State

112 Tex. Crim. 450 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 31, 1928

We do not discuss the Brown case further than to say that it, in common with O’Shennessey v. State, 96 S. W. Rep. 790 ; Sessions v. State, 98 S. W. Rep. 243 ; Ellington v. State, 86 S. W. Rep. 330 , and Price v. … To hold otherwise would necessitate overruling the cases cited in Brown v. State (supra) and again listed here for convenience. Dixon v. State, 21 Tex. Cr. App. 517, 1 S. W. 448 ; O’Shennessy v. State, 49 Tex. Cr.

Ashworth v. State

151 Tex. Crim. 83 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 29, 1947

See Burns v. State, 12 Tex. Cr. App. 269; White v. State, 10 Tex. App. 167; Graham v. State, 163 S. W. 726 ; McGaughey v. State, 169 S. W. 287 . See Art. 563, Vernon’s Ann. C. C. … See Galvan v. State, 150 S. W. 1171 ; Guerrero v. State, 171 S. W. 731 ; Watson v. State, 199 S. W. 1113 ; and Jones v. State, 46 S. W. (2d) 308 .

Walker v. State

267 S.W. 988 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 17, 1924

P.; Brown v. State, 32 Tex. Cr. R. 119 , 22 S. W. 596 ; Barkman v. State, 41 Tex. Cr. R. 105 , 52 S. W. 73 ; and other authorities cited on page 180, Vernon’s Cr. S., vol. 2. … I then placed my right hand upon the windshield and my left hand on the cab and stood there with my left foot on the running board and talked to him.

Hunter v. State

530 S.W.2d 573 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 17, 1975

Rogers said that he told Brown to go home and take it easy. … Further, appellant did not object to the testimony of Brown’s death. Failure to object presents nothing for review. Bell v. State, 501 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Navajar v. State, 496 S.W.2d 61 (Tex.Cr.App.1973).

Walker v. State

98 Tex. Crim. 663 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 17, 1924

P.; Brown v. State, 32 Texas Crim. Rep., 119 , 22 S. W. 596 ; Barkman v. State, 41 Texas Crim. Rep., 105 , 52 S. W. 73 ; and other authorities cited on page 180, Vernon’s Crim. S. Vol. 2. … I then placed my right hand upon the windshield and my left hand on the cab and stood there with my left foot on the running board and talked to him.

McNeely v. State

49 Tex. Crim. 286 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 7, 1906

appellant to give Brown an order on the express company for the package. … Ashley v. State, 10 Texas Ct. Rep., 271; Ellington v. State, 12 Texas Ct. Rep., 800. For the error pointed out, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.

McGinn v. State

961 S.W.2d 161 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 21, 1998

In a trial beginning in May of 1995, appellant was convicted of the capital murder of twelve-year-old Stephanie Flanary committed on May 22, 1993 in Brown County. … Broxton v. State, 909 S.W.2d 912, 918-919 (Tex.Crim.App.1995). We have also held that a trial court does not err in instructing a jury not to consider any possible action by the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Maixner v. State

753 S.W.2d 151 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 22, 1988

The Supreme Court of the United States in Brown v. … Brown v. Illinois, supra, 422 U.S. at 605 , 95 S.Ct. at 2262 , 45 L.Ed.2d at 428 ; Self v. State, supra, 709 S.W.2d at 667 . Thus, the fourth factor of Brown analysis must be decided adversely to appellant’s position.

Dupree v. State

56 Tex. Crim. 562 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 26, 1909

To the same effect see Brown v. State, 43 Texas Crim. Rep., 272 ; Washington v. State, 35 Texas Crim. Rep., 156 ; Powell v. State, 42 Texas Crim. Rep., 11 . … Vestal v. The State, 3 Texas Crim. App., 648, and authorities there cited. Simco v. The State, ante, p. 338.

Liebman v. State

652 S.W.2d 942 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 11, 1983

Britt v. Superior Court, 58 Cal.2d 469 , 24 Cal.Rptr. 849 , 374 P.2d 817 . The occupants are entitled to the modicum of privacy its design affords. Brown v. State, 3 Md.App. 90 , 238 A.2d 147 . … Moreover, these officers had no more probable cause to believe these appellants were “about to commit an offense” simply because they entered adjacent “glory hole” booths than the officers in Brown v.

Cox v. State

144 Tex. Crim. 554 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 17, 1942

The hogs'belonged to Charlie Brown, but Cone had the care, control and management of them. Appellant lived on a place which adjoined Brown’s farm. … Cannada v. State, 29 Tex. Cr. R. 537 , 16 S. W. 341 ; Smith v. State, 91 Tex. Cr. R. 15 , 237 S. W. 265 and cases therein cited; Stewart v. State, 124 Tex. Cr. R. 632 , 64 S. W. (2d) 782 .