Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstexcrimapp

9,209 results

1.14s

  • Leal, Humberto, Jr.

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 18, 2009

    Leal v. State, supra, slip op. at 1-3. … Prible v. State, 245 S.W.3d at 467-68.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rojas v. State

    986 S.W.2d 241 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 23, 1998

    Wright v. … See Santellan, 939 S.W.2d at 168-70 ; Brown v. State, 696 S.W.2d 913, 914 (Tex.Crim.App.1985).

    Cited 419 timesPublished
  • Harris v. State

    827 S.W.2d 949 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 22, 1992

    Madden v. … Brown v. State, 692 S.W.2d 497, 502 (Tex.Cr.App.1985). If the prosecutor strays outside these areas, the defendant, to preserve error, must object until receiving an adverse ruling. Harris v.

    Abrogated on other grounds by Cockrell v. State, 1996 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 182 (1996)Cited 524 timesPublished
  • Chapin v. State

    107 Tex. Crim. 477 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 22, 1927

    Penal Code, Arts. 1391 and 1395; Hipp v. State, 45 Tex.Crim. Rep.; Hooper v. State, 105 S.W. 816 ; Favro v. State, 39 Tex.Crim. Rep.. … See Coyle v. Commonwealth, 104 Pa. 133 ; Cox v. U.S., 50 P. 175 ; 5 Okla. 701 ; First National Bank v. Swan, 23 P. 743 ; Spalding v. Spalding (N.Y.), 3 How. Prac. 297, 301 ; also Hennessy v.

    Cited 84 timesPublished
  • Shannon v. State

    942 S.W.2d 591 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 11, 1996

    Tuilaepa v. … Furthermore, the jury was instructed in the charge that: During your deliberations, you are not to consider or discuss any possible action of the Board of Pardons and Paroles Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice

    Cited 203 timesPublished
  • Moore v. State

    542 S.W.2d 664 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 6, 1976

    In Orange v. … In Lightner v. State, 535 S.W.2d 176 (Tex.Cr. App.1976), and Brown v.

    Overruled on other grounds by Butler v. State, 1992 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 116 (1992)Cited 140 timesPublished
  • Maldonado v. State

    998 S.W.2d 239 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 30, 1999

    Colburn v. State, 966 S.W.2d 511, 517 (Tex.Crim.App.1998); Brown v. State, 913 S.W.2d 577, 580 (Tex.Crim.App.1996). … Moore v.

    Cited 127 timesPublished
  • Plummer, Marquis Andre

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 9, 2013

    In Tyra v. … In Coleman v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Richardson v. State

    865 S.W.2d 944 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 27, 1993

    Even if the language of Article I, § 9 were identical with that of the Fourth Amendment, we must construe that language according to our own lights. 3 Id.; Brown v. … State v.

    Cited 134 timesPublished
  • Whorton v. State

    69 Tex. Crim. 1 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 8, 1913

    (Ballew v. State, 36 Texas, 98 ; Preston v. State, 8 Texas Crim. App., 30; Bouldin v. State, 8 Texas Crim. App., 332; Grimmett v. State, 22 Texas Crim. App., 36; Simmons v. State, 10 Texas Crim. App., 131; McGuire v. … Cockburn and Bill Leatherwood on the envelope which I had in my pocket, which was turned over to John Brown and Barney Barker.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Leal, Humberto, Jr.

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 18, 2009

    AP-76,049 HUMBERTO LEAL, JR., Appellant v. … Leal v. State , supra , slip op. at 1-3.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cosio v. State

    353 S.W.3d 766 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 14, 2011

    State and Crawford v. State. … Under Almanza v.

    Cited 430 timesPublished
  • Jackson v. State

    551 S.W.2d 351 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 9, 1977

    In Commonwealth v. … , brown boots, and a gold necklace.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Jones, Quintin Phillippe AKA Jones, Quinton

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 5, 2003

    In Biddy v. … Jackson v. State , 375 N.E.2d 223, 225 (Ind. 1978). 25. Id. 26. Id. 27. Id. 28. State v. Russell , 261 N.W.2d 490, 492-495 (Iowa 1978). 29. State v. Brown , 601 S.W.2d 311, 314 (Mo. App, E.D. 1980). 30. Id. 31. Id. 32.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mondee Stracener v. Doug Stracener, Bernice L. Stracener and Joey Keith Stracener

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 10, 2015

    Minton State Bar No. 14195000 Minton & Brown, PLLC P. 0. … v ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Railey v. State

    58 Tex. Crim. 1 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 19, 1909

    In the case of Garner v. State, 31 Tex.Crim. … In the case of Hammond v. State, 29 Texas Crim.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Knight v. State

    64 Tex. Crim. 541 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 17, 1912

    In the case of Browning v. State, 26 Texas Crim. … For other opinions by our presiding judge see Brown v. State, 32 Tex. Crim. 119 ; Johnson v. State, 47 Tex. Crim. 523 ; Williams v. State, 53 Tex.Crim. Rep..

    Cited 50 timesPublished
  • Gossett v. State

    57 Tex. Crim. 43 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 13, 1909

    We think the contrary of this proposition is in terms decided in the case of Puryear v. State, 28 Texas Crim. Rep., 73 . … We think the case is easily distinguishable from the case of McCloy v. State, 80 S. W. Rep., 524 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Satterwhite v. State

    858 S.W.2d 412 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 10, 1993

    Jerome Tilles, M.D., a board certified psychiatrist. … Sparks, a board certified psychiatrist who is currently the director of the Medical/Psychiatric Department of the Bexar County Detention Center.

    Cited 128 timesPublished
  • Messer v. State

    729 S.W.2d 694 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 1, 1987

    Then along came Burks v. United States, 437 U.S. 1 , 98 S.Ct. 2141 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1 (1978), Greene v. … That was his precise contention on appearand the Court found that State failed to prove “the brown powdered substance was heroin,” Duran, at 843.

    Cited 51 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.