Case law

Parks v. State

124 Tex. Crim. 405 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 24, 1933

Appellant paid her room rent and board, and bought her an insurance policy. Apparently he furnished her money whenever she asked for it. … See, also, Funston v. State, 38 S. W. (2d) 335 . Appellant cites Hill v. State, 95 Texas Crim. Rep., 500 , 255 S. W., 433 . In that case’ the accused was on trial for transporting intoxicating liquor.

Grotti, Lydia H. AKA Grotti, Lydia

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 25, 2008

Malik v. State, 953 S.W.2d at 234. … Zimmerman based her opinions on McGhee’s medical records, JPS employee affidavits, information from the Board, and letters. 24 Dr.

Wade, Robert Eric Iii

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 6, 2022

v. … For example, in Williams v.

in the Interest of A. B. B. and P. L. B., Minor Children

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Aug 21, 2015

We know from Strickland v. … (mem.op.), citing Culver v. Culver, 360 S.W.3d 526, 535 (Tex.App.--Texarkana 2011, no pet.) In Lassiter v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs.

Lane v. State

933 S.W.2d 504 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 6, 1996

See Banda v. … In Smith v.

Laird v. State

79 Tex. Crim. 129 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 26, 1916

Murchison v. White, 54 Tex. 78 ; Williams v. Ball, 52 Tex. 603 [ 52 Tex. 603 ]; Brown v. Christie, 27 Tex. 73 ; Heck Baker v. Martin, 75 Tex. 469 ; Foweler v. Simpson, 79 Tex. 611 ; Martin v. … Brown v. Christie, 27 Tex. 73 ."

Gonzales v. State

304 S.W.3d 838 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 24, 2010

Gonzales v. State, supra, at *5. 13 . Id. at *6. 14 . Id. at *7. 15 . Tex Penal Code § 22.021. 16 . Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 164 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977). 17 . Id. at 165 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 . 18 . … Haight v. State, supra. See also Pizzo v.

Williams v. State

37 Tex. Crim. 348 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 24, 1897

From Dove v. … The court cites Gibson v. Gibson, 9 Yerg., 329 . To the same effect, see, State v. Bryant, 93 Mo., 273 , and Wood v. State, 58 Miss., 741 .

State v. Gonzalez

855 S.W.2d 692 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 14, 1993

Trevino v. … V.

Ex parte Taylor

777 S.W.2d 98 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 20, 1989

See Gremmel v. State, 169 Tex.Crim. 508 , 335 S.W.2d 614 (1960). … Applicant is board certified in the areas of criminal, civil trial, and personal injury law. . Judge Hopkins was appointed by Honorable Charles Murray, presiding Judge of the Eighth Administration Judicial District.

Ex Parte Gilmore

88 Tex. Crim. 529 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 1, 1920

Ex parte McNiel, 13 Wallace, 236; Port Richmond v. Board of Freeholders, 234 U.S. 330 ; Simpson v. Shepard, 230 U.S. 400 , 48 L.R.A., New Series, 1151, and numerous cases cited in Rose's Notes on U.S. … Gilman v. Phila., supra. See Manigault v. Spring, 199 U.S. 478 ; Chicago v. Illinois, 200 U.S. 592 .

Wysong v. State

66 Tex. Crim. 201 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 17, 1911

Walker v. State, 13 Texas Crim. App., 618; Allison v. State, 14 Texas Crim. App., 402; Beatey v. State, 16 Texas Crim. App., 421; Tucker v. State, 23 Texas Crim. App., 512; McAdams v. State, 24 Texas Crim. App., 86. … Gray v. State, 61 Tex.Crim. Rep., 131 S.W. Rep., 1179 ; High v. State, 54 Tex.Crim. Rep.; Brown v. State, 50 S.W. Rep., 354 ; Chapman v. State, 53 S.W. Rep., 103 ; and the cases cited and reviewed in the case of Gray v.

Gibson v. State

153 Tex. Crim. 582 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 15, 1949

Jur. p. 339, sec. 209; Trigg v. State, 99 Tex. Cr. R. 376 , 269 S. W. 782 . In the case of Young v. State, 49 Tex. Cr. R. 207 , 92 S. … See Powell v. State, 50 Tex. Cr. R. 592 , 99 S. W. 1005 ; Gibson v. State, 53 Tex. Cr. R. 349 , 110 S. W. 41 , both death penalty cases; see also Willis v. State, supra, and Young v. State, supra. In Franklin v.

Havard v. State

800 S.W.2d 195 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 28, 1990

Brown v. State, 696 S.W.2d 913, 914 (Tex. Cr.App.1985); cf. James v. State, 772 S.W.2d 84, 98 (Tex.Cr.App.1989). In Brown, supra, the defendant was tried for attempting to murder Ruiz. … In King v.

State Ex Rel. Eidson v. Edwards

793 S.W.2d 1 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 27, 1990

Eidson v. … —San Antonio 1957, no writ); Neal v. Sheppard, 209 S.W.2d 388, 390-391 (Tex.Civ.App.—Texarkana 1948, writ ref’d.); State Board of Dental Examiners v. Bickham, 203 S.W.2d 563, 566 (Tex.Civ.App.

Andujo v. State

755 S.W.2d 138 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jul 13, 1988

Griffin v. State, 554 S.W.2d 688, 696 (Tex.Cr.App.1977). See also Denison v. State, 651 S.W.2d 754, 761-762 (Tex.Cr.App.1983); Carter v. State, 614 S.W.2d 821, 823 (Tex.Cr.App.1981); Vaughn v. … See Blansett v. State, 556 S.W.2d 322, 328 (Tex.Cr.App.1977). See also Brown v. State, 692 S.W.2d 497, 502 (Tex.Cr.App.1985); Johnson v. State, 698 S.W.2d 154, 167 (Tex.Cr.App.1985); McKay v.

Bustillos v. State

152 Tex. Crim. 275 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 16, 1948

See Lugo v. State, 136 Tex. Cr. R. 226 , 124 S. W. (2d) 344 . … Again, in the case of Board of Trustees of Seventh St. Colored M. E. Church v.

Taylor v. State

89 Tex. Crim. 112 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 2, 1921

Jeffries v. State, 9 Texas Crim. *119 App., 598; Holden v. State, 18 Texas Crim. App., 91; Browning v. State, 26 Texas Crim. App., 432; Humphrey v. State, 47 Texas Crim. Rep., 262 ; Jennings v. State, 42 Texas Crim. … Rep., 78 ; Rainer v. State, 67 Texas Crim. Rep., 87 , 148 S. W. Rep., 735 ; Ryan v. State, 64 Texas Crim. Rep., 628 , 142 S. W. Rep., 878 ; McKelvey v. State, 69 Texas Crim. Rep., 538 , 155 S. W. Rep., 932 ; Knight v.

Pope, Curtis Wayne Jr.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 15, 2006

Jackson , 636 So. 2d 310, 314-15 (Miss. 1994); Seeber v. Howlette , 586 N.W.2d 445, 451 (Neb. 1998). But see Cogdell v. Brown , 531 A.2d 1379, 1382 (N.J. Super. Ct. Law. … Brown v. Ringstad , 142 F.R.D. 461, 465 (S.D. Iowa 1992). 45.

Milo and Bradford v. State

59 Tex. Crim. 196 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 23, 1910

will be overruled in view of the fact that the defendants’ counsel had cross-examined the witness as to how he came with the money that was in the valise and he accounted for some twenty odd dollars of it by payment of board … The cases cited by appellants to support this proposition— Simmons v. State, 55 Texas Crim. Rep., 441 ; 117 S. W. Rep., 141 ; Moore v. State, 33 Texas Crim. Rep., 306 , and Kirk v. State, 35 Texas Crim.