Case law

Abdnor v. State

712 S.W.2d 136 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 11, 1986

Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12 , 76 S.Ct. 585 , 100 L.Ed. 891 (1956); Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477 , 83 S.Ct. 768 , 9 L.Ed.2d 892 (1963); Eskridge v. … Barber v.

Stein v. State

514 S.W.2d 927 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 9, 1974

Moulton v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 486 S.W.2d 334 ; Palmer v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 475 S.W.2d 797 ; Parker v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 384 S.W.2d 712 ; Brown v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 457 S.W.2d 917 ; Tsoi v. … Jackson v. State, supra; Gaskin v. State, supra; Zanders v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 480 S.W.2d 708 .

Fowler v. State

500 S.W.2d 643 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 31, 1973

Durst v. State, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 466 , 265 S.W. 2d 118 . See Vineyard v. State, 96 Tex.Cr.R. 401 , 257 S.W. 548 . In Palmer v. State, 148 Tex.Cr.R. 39 , 184 S.W.2d 471 , Judge Hawkins wrote: “. . .It was said in Gatlin v. … See also Brown v. State, 95 Tex.Cr.R. 343 , 254 S.W. 995 .

Benson v. State

56 Tex. Crim. 52 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 28, 1909

Hatch v. State, 8 Texas Crim. App., 416;. House v. State, 9 Texas Crim. App., 567; Moore v. State, 21 Texas Crim. App., 666; Fuller v. State, 30 Texas Crim. App., 559; Richardson v. State, 33 Texas Crim. Rep., 518 . … “And so in Brown v. Swineford, 44 Wis., 282 , the following appropriate language upon this subject is used by the court: 'The profession of the law is instituted for the administration of justice.

Oates v. State

56 Tex. Crim. 571 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 23, 1909

In the ease of Texas & Pacific Railway Company v. … This question has been passed upon by this court, and held adversely to appellant’s contention, in the cases of Smith v. State, 54 Texas Crim. Rep., 298 ; 113 S. W. Rep., 289 ; Brown v. State, 54 Texas Crim.

Ex Parte Anderson

51 Tex. Crim. 239 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 6, 1907

To sustain his contention, relator cites us to Arnold v. Anderson, 14 Texas Ct. Rep., 713; Clark v. Hardison, 14 Texas Ct. Rep., 227, and other cases. … In Arnold v.

Ex Parte Taylor

957 S.W.2d 43 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 26, 1997

See United States v. McCormick, 54 F.3d 214 (5th Cir.1995); United States v. Pratt, 52 F.3d 671 (7th Cir.1995); United States v. Zentgraf, 20 F.3d 906 (8th Cir.1994); United States v. Penn, 721 F.2d 762 (11th Cir.1983). … In Gagnon v.

Crow v. State

147 Tex. Crim. 292 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 17, 1943

Appellant apparently recognizes that the holding in Tyson v. State, Tex. Cr. … So far as our own state *Page 297 is concerned the question appears to have been quite definitely settled against appellant's contention in an opinion by Judge Brown of our Supreme Court in Storrie v.

Burton, Arthur Lee

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 19, 2004

Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U.S. 307 (1979); Allridge v. State , 850 S.W.2d 471, 487 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991), cert. denied , 510 U.S. 831 (1993). … This information was also used by the Board of Pardons and Paroles to assess whether it should require any counseling before the inmate's release.

Mickle v. State

88 Tex. Crim. 405 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 26, 1921

Danforth v. State, 44 Texas Crim. Rep., 114 ; Gardner v. State, 44 Texas Crim. Rep., 572 ; Hayman v. State, 47 Texas Crim. Rep., 263 ; Arnwine v. State, 49 Texas Crim. Rep., 5 . … Skidmore v. State, 43 Texas, 93 ; Skidmore v. State, 2 Texas Crim. App., 2; Pilcher v. State, 32 Texas Crim. Rep., 557 .

Kelly, Sylvester

436 S.W.3d 313 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 25, 2014

Following this example, in Brown v. State, 485 S.W.2d 914, 915 (Tex.Crim.App.1972), we ordered the trial court to "make the record ... available to appellant so that he might file a pro se brief if he so desires.” … Meza v. State, 206 S.W.3d 684, 689 (Tex.Crim.App.2006). . Id. at 687 . See Penson v.

BRIMZY, LATORA v. the State of Texas

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 30, 2025

See Brown v. State, 354 S.W.3d 518, 520 n.3 (Tex. App.— Fort Worth 2011, pet. ref’d); Scales v. State, 658 S.W.3d 366, 372−73 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2022, no pet.); Brimzy v. State, 2024 WL 1313406, at *1. … v.

Vastine v. State

84 Tex. Crim. 214 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 23, 1918

The stenographer was busy in court and some of his help was upon the draft board during such time. … See Peddy v. State, 63 Texas Crim. Rep., 483 ; Roberts v. State, 70 Texas Crim. Rep., 588 ; Chavario v. State, 72 Texas Crim. Rep., 240 ; Archer v. State 74 Texas Crim. Rep., 524 ; also Roberts v. State, 62 Texas Crim.

Dover v. State

102 Tex. Crim. 113 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 6, 1925

to ask the witness, Sim Adkins, as to whether anything was said there at the time of the dispute in the poker game as to who was wrong about it, and in permitting the witness to say that all of them that were around the board … Emerson v. State, recently decided by this court and not yet reported.

Flanagan v. State

675 S.W.2d 734 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 19, 1984

(emphasis added) This finding was reiterated by Commissioner Brown in Garcia, supra, and by Com *741 missioner Keith in Teal v. State, 543 S.W.2d 371 (Tex.Cr.App.1976). … See Passmore v. State, 617 S.W.2d 682 (Tex.Cr.App.1981); Mercado v. State, 615 S.W.2d 225 (Tex.Cr.App.1981); Witt v. State, 475 S.W.2d 259 (Tex.Cr.App.1971).

Santibanez v. State

717 S.W.2d 326 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 14, 1986

Philen v. State, 683 S.W.2d 440 (Tex.Cr.App.1984); Lee v. State, 641 S.W.2d 533 (Tex.Cr.App.1982); Barfield v. State, 586 S.W.2d 538 (Tex.Cr.App.1979). In Kalish v. … In Ordunez v.

Long v. State

170 Tex. Crim. 177 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 18, 1960

339 S.W.2d 215 (1960) Charles Herbert LONG, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 31934. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. May 18, 1960. Rehearing Denied October 5, 1960. Wardlaw, Cochran & Brown, by George E. … These are: Davis v. Laning, 85 Tex. 39 , 19 S.W. 846 , 18 L.R.A. 82 , and American National Insurance Co. v.

Romero v. State

493 S.W.2d 206 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 18, 1973

In Lee v. … See State v. Valdez, supra; People v. Houser, 85 Cal.App.2d 686 , 193 P.2d 937 (1948); People v. Davis, 270 Cal.App.2d 841 , 76 Cal.Rptr. 242 (1969); State v. Brown, 177 So.2d 532 (Fla.App.2d 1965); State v.

State v. Comeaux

818 S.W.2d 46 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jul 3, 1991

See and compare Bower v. State, 769 S.W.2d 887 (Tex.Cr. App.1989), cert. denied 492 U.S. 927 , 109 S.Ct. 3266 , 106 L.Ed.2d 611 (1989); Brown v. State, 657 S.W.2d 797 (Tex.Cr.App.1983). Heitman v. … U.S. v. 'Jacobsen, supra; Vargas v. State, supra.

Otto v. State

273 S.W.3d 165 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 6, 2008

See Rodriguez v. State, 18 S.W.3d 228, 229-32 (Tex.Crim.App.2000). . See Gray v. State, 152 S.W.3d 125, 128 (Tex.Crim.App.2004); Sutton v. State, 899 S.W.2d 682, 685 (Tex.Crim.App.1995) (plurality op.). . … See Brown v. State, 122 S.W.3d 794, 799 (Tex.Crim.App.2003) (“Texas courts are forbidden from instructing the jury on any presumption or evidentiary sufficiency rule that does not have a statutory basis.”); Atkins v.