Case law

Ex parte Dick

724 S.W.2d 69 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 4, 1987

Conley v. Daughters of the Republic, 157 S.W. 937 (Tex.1913). … Hines v. State, 515 S.W.2d 670, 675 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Grant v. State, 505 S.W.2d 279, 282 (Tex.Cr.App.1974), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 968 , 94 S.Ct. 3172 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1139 (1974); Lane v.

Spakes v. State

913 S.W.2d 597 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 10, 1996

Brown, 68 A.D.2d 503 , 417 N.Y.S.2d 966, 972-973 (N.Y.A.D., 2 Dept.1979) (justification also known as necessity); North Carolina, State v. Watts, 60 N.C.App. 191 , 298 S.E.2d 436, 437 (1982) (duress); Ohio, State v. … In Brown , the New York court held that its statute is the final benchmark on the parameters of the necessity defense but cited Lovercamp favorably. 417 N.Y.S.2d at 972 . [9] The Model Penal Code's version of the defense

Price v. State

866 S.W.2d 606 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 3, 1993

See Price v. State, 861 S.W.2d 913 (Tex.Cr.App. … See, e.g., Ex parte Ross, 522 S.W.2d 214, at 222-223 (Tex.Cr.App.1975); Brown v.

DAVIS, WILLIAM GEORGE v. the State of Texas

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 12, 2026

Brown v. State, 270 S.W.3d 564, 572–73 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (cleaned up). In this case, we conclude that the alleged error did not affect Appellant’s substantial rights. First, any misconduct here was mild. … See Brown, 270 S.W.3d at 573.

Saldano v. State

70 S.W.3d 873 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 13, 2002

"Administrative power is further decentralized by the creation of more than a hundred independent state agencies, practically all of which are headed either by elected executives or by part-time boards and commissions, that … Brown, 460 U.S. 730 , 103 S.Ct. 1535 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983) (Criminal District Attorney of Tarrant County). . See Texas v.

Ex Parte McAfee

761 S.W.2d 771 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 8, 1988

Benton v. Maryland, 395 U.S. 784 , 89 S.Ct. 2056 , 23 L.Ed.2d 707 (1969); Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977); Arizona v. … He filed a pretrial motion to dismiss the indictment because the local board had failed to state adequate reasons for refusing to reopen his file and to follow other procedures.

Ex Parte Mays

152 Tex. Crim. 172 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 9, 1948

It has been held, however, in the case of Wallace v. State, 111 Tex. Cr. 507, 14 S. … App. 566-576, we find the following quotation: “He further (Brown on Jurisdiction) says: ‘There are three essential elements necessary to render a conviction valid.

State v. Cortez

543 S.W.3d 198 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 24, 2018

Can you walk up to the board and show the court what you claim to be a violation. A. … Brown v. State , 481 S.W.2d 106 , 111 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972) (quoting Wong Sun v.

Weinstein, Steven Mark

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 29, 2014

See also Smith v. … Brown, 169 Ill. 2d 94, 106, 660, N.E.2d 964, 970 (1995) (“In the absence of an allegation of the knowing use of false testimony, or at least some lack of diligence on the part of the State, there has been no involvement by

Mireles v. State

901 S.W.2d 458 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 24, 1995

Johnson v. The State, 1 Tex.App. 118, 120-21 (1876). See also Brown v. State, 65 Tex.Crim.R. 78, 143 S.W. 183 (1912). … E.g., Haynes v. State, 56 S.W. 923 (Tex.Crim.App.1900); Knight v. State, 64 Tex.Crim.R. 541, 144 S.W. 967, 977-78 (1912); Grantom v. State, 415 S.W.2d 664, 665 (Tex.Crim.App.1967); Brown v.

Lopez v. State

928 S.W.2d 528 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 8, 1996

Rose v. Locke, 423 U.S. 48, 53 , 96 S.Ct. 243, 246 , 46 L.Ed.2d 185 (1975). Splaum v. … Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 , 169 n. 8, 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 2227 n. 8, 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977). Osborne v.

Mark J. Mueller v. James H. Davis, Individually, James H. Davis D/B/A J.D. Minerals, and JDMI, LLC

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 12, 2015

MARAIST BOARD CE,;,nnco 8USNESS BAt!K! … Oils v. Bartels, 270 S.W.2d 708, 711 (Tex.Civ.App.-Eastland 1954, writ refd) (citing Pickett v. Bishop, 148 Tex. 207, 223 S.W.2d 222 (1949); Sanderson v. Sanderson, 130 Tex. 264, 109 S.

Swaim v. State

498 S.W.2d 188 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jul 11, 1973

Huber v. Buder, Civ.App.1963, 434 S.W.2d 177 , ref., n. r. e.; White v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of City of Arlington, Civ.App.1963, 363 S.W.2d 955 . See also Bonds v. State, 162 Tex.Cr.R. 419 , 286 S.W.2d 313 . … Article 17.-08(3), Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.; Pharis v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 362 S.W.2d 857 ; Rees v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 13 S.W.2d 856 ; Holley v. State, 70 Tex.Cr.R. 511 , 157 S.W. 937 ; Barrett v.

Smith v. State

112 Tex. Crim. 567 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 6, 1929

The cases nearest in point in his favor are Peacock v. State, 44 Tex. Rep. 11 , and Lindsey v. State, 17 Tex.Crim. App. 120. … In Brown's case, 28 Tex.Crim.

Saenz v. State

843 S.W.2d 24 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 25, 1992

In Fullbright v. … There are many cases in which this Court has done the harmless error analysis in the first instance, e.g., London v. State, 739 S.W.2d 842 (Tex.Cr.App.1987); Brown v. State, 757 S.W.2d 739 (Tex.Cr.App.1988); McGary v.

McKee v. State

118 Tex. Crim. 479 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 29, 1931

. ; Brown v. State, 87 Texas Crim. Rep., 261 , 222 S. W., 252 ; 30 Corpus Juris, p. 49. … Walker v. State, 7 Texas App., 264, 32 Am. Reps., 595; Guerrero v. State, 46 Texas Crim. Rep., 447 , 80 S. W., 1001 ; Pitts v. State, 60 Texas Crim. Rep., 527 , 132 S. W., 802 .

Coker v. State

92 Tex. Crim. 41 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 24, 1922

Wallace v. State, 46 Texas Crim. Rep., 349 ; Brown v. State, 74 Texas Crim. Rep., 356 ; Taylor v. State, 81 Texas Crim. Rep., 364 ; Taylor v. State, 87 Texas Crim. Rep., 338 .

Lyle v. State

31 Tex. Crim. 103 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 25, 1892

Colbath v. The State, *115 4 Texas Ct. App., 76; Brown v. The State, Id., 275; McCarty v. The State, Id., 461; Payne v. The State, 5 Texas Ct. App., 35; Golliher v. Commonwealth, 2 Duv., 163 ; The People v. … Rep., 601 ; Cartwright v. The State, 8 Lea, 376 ; McIntyre v. The People, 38 Ill., 514 ; Roberts v. The People, 19 Mich., 401 ; The People v. Harris, 29 Cal., 678 ; The People v. Eastwood, 14 N. Y., 562 ; The People v.

Schutz v. State

957 S.W.2d 52 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 3, 1997

v. … Brown v. State, 756 S.W.2d 793, 796 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1988). But Brown is not clear authority. as it involved the significant additional element of several defense witnesses.

Bacon v. State

134 Tex. Crim. 72 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 26, 1938

Appellant complains in bill of exception No. 4 of the fact that the court refused to instruct the jury that the inspectors of the Liquor Control Board, Mr. Schuck and Mr. … The facts relative to this purchase by these two inspectors are practically the same as those set forth in Stevens v. State, 110 S.W.2d 906 , in which this Court held that such witnesses were not accomplices.