Case law

Johnson v. State

68 S.W.3d 644 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 30, 2002

According to Batson v. … See Ransom v.

Ex Parte McIver

586 S.W.2d 851 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 11, 1979

See 53 Tex.Jur.2d, Statutes, Section 142, pp. 205-207; Peterson v. Calvert, 473 S.W.2d 314 (Tex.Civ.App.1971, writ ref’d). This rule has been pronounced a logical, sensible, and sound rule of statutory construction. … See Carp v. Texas State Board of Examiners of Optometry, 401 S.W.2d 639 (Tex.Civ.App.1966), aff’d, 412 S.W.2d 307 (Tex.1967); City of Dallas v. Yarbrough, 399 S.W.2d 938 (Tex.Civ.App. 1966, no writ); Harris County v.

Garrett v. State

377 S.W.3d 697 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 20, 2012

See also Volosen v. … (comparing Schroeter with Brown v. State, 943 S.W.2d 35, 40 (Tex.Crim.App.1997)).

State of Texas v. Dobbs, Matthew Ryan

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 20, 2010

Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 738 (1983) (plurality opinion); Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321, 326-27 (1987). 6 E.g., Minnesota v. … E.g., Illinois v.

Smith v. State

147 Tex. Crim. 278 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 10, 1943

Jur., p. 550; Miller v. State, 112 Texas Cr. R. 125, 13 S. W. (2d) 865 ; Thompson v. State, 24 Tex. App. 383, 6 S. W. 296 ; Crutchfield v. State, 110 Texas Cr. R. 420, 10 S. W. (2d) 119 . … The case of Latta v. State, supra, quoted in the original opinion, is not in point.

Doan, Ex Parte Dustin

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 20, 2012

Sperling v. Fitzpatrick , 426 F.2d 1161 (2d Cir. 1970); United States ex rel. Lombardino v. Heyd , [ 318 F.Supp. 648 (E.D. … Two of them, Bryant v. L.H. Moore Canning Company (27) and Railroad Commission v. Phillips , (28) dealt with decisions by administrative agencies. The third, Killingsworth v.

W. M. Banks v. State

131 Tex. Crim. 196 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 24, 1936

Williams v. State, 67 Texas Crim. Rep., 590 ; Brown v. State, 57 Texas Crim. Rep., 269 ; Vann v. State, 84 Texas Crim., 97; Rippey v. State, 86 Texas Crim. Rep., 539 ; Dollar v. State, 86 Texas Crim. … Highsmith v. State, 41 Texas Crim. Rep., 38 ; Connell v. State, 45 Texas Crim. Rep., 161 ; Ward v. State, 159 S. W. Rep., 277 .

Martin, Doris Ann

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Aug 21, 2024

Massey v. State, 667 S.W.3d 784 (Tex. Crim. App. 2023). 7 B. … Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 437 (1995). Nevertheless, in United States v.

Delorme v. State

488 S.W.2d 808 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 10, 1973

State v. Van Camp, 280 A.2d 536 (1971). 9 In State v. … Board of Public Instruction, 368 U.S. 278 , 82 S.Ct. 275 , 7 *812 L.Ed.2d 285 (1961); and Lanzetta v.

Welch v. State

46 Tex. Crim. 528 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 25, 1904

From the record it appears that defendant boarded with Mrs. Robert Meade in Vicksburg, Mississippi, sometime prior to his coming to Greenville, where he married his second wife. … Similar testimony to that here complained of was held reversible error in Denton v. State, 9 Texas Ct. Rep., 947. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Brister, Mark Randall

449 S.W.3d 490 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 10, 2014

V. … Denton v. State, 911 S.W .2d 388, 389 (Tex. Crim.

Mason v. State

604 S.W.2d 83 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 2, 1979

Rife with flagrant hearsay and other inadmissible accounts, Bean v. State, 563 S.W.2d 819, 821 (Tex.Cr.App.1978) (Onion, P. J., concurring), the material is nevertheless available to the trial court, Brown v. … v.

Perkins v. State

812 S.W.2d 326 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 26, 1991

See Perkins v. State, 771 S.W.2d 195 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1989). … .-203, 2 which permits governing boards of state institutions of higher education to employ campus security personnel. In Preston we expressly overruled Christopher v.

Somers, Aaron

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 6, 2012

PD-0056-11 AARON SOMERS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS BRAZOS COUNTY Johnson, J., filed a dissenting opinion . … just before impact, it could have no relevance in a crash in which appellant literally ran up the complainant's tailpipe, causing her car to violently rotate 180º and his car to use her left rear quarter panel as a spring board

Luper v. State

364 S.W.2d 230 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 30, 1963

After passing through Bells, “Arthur got a lug wrench that was on the back floor board of the car and started hitting Gus Sloan with it.” … Among the cases cited by appellant, we find only Ramirez v. State, 112 Tex.Cr.R. 332 , 16 S.W.2d 814 , and Grille v. State, 112 Tex.Cr.R. 561 , 17 S.W.2d 833 , which require differentiation.

Martin, Doris Ann

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Aug 21, 2024

Massey v. State, 667 S.W.3d 784 (Tex. Crim. App. 2023). 7 B. … Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 437 (1995). Nevertheless, in United States v.

Druery v. State

225 S.W.3d 491 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 4, 2007

. *496 Statement of Facts On October 30, 2002, Druery went to Skyyler Browne’s apartment on the Texas State Technical College campus in Waco where both were students. Browne was commonly known by his nickname “Rome.” … King v. State, 553 S.W.2d 105, 107 (Tex.Crim.App.1977). . Earhart v. State, 877 S.W.2d 759, 767 (Tex.Crim.App.1994). . King, 553 S.W.2d at 107 . . Jurek v.

Hampton v. State

78 Tex. Crim. 639 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 2, 1916

Bills of exception Nos. 3 and 4 show that Aaron Brown was permitted to testify, “that twenty years after the death of Mrs. … Weaver v. State, 46 Texas Crim. Rep., 607 ; McLain v. State, 30 Texas Crim. App., 482; Goldsmith v. State, 82 Texas Crim. Rep., 112 ; Thompson v. State, 45 Texas Crim. Rep., 190 ; Meyers v. State, 14 Texas Crim.

Wooten v. State

111 Tex. Crim. 226 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 25, 1928

On rebuttal Reed testified that when he came back by the car with appellant, and while Lott and Crosby were still standing near the car witness saw the door of the car open and saw glass on the floor boards and fender.' … It may be conceded that the language of the charge was not well chosen and is subject to criticism as indicated by the opinions in Landers v. State, 63 S. W. 557 ; Rice v. State, 103 S. W. 1156 ; Sain v. State, 148 S.

Overton, Hannah Ruth

444 S.W.3d 632 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 17, 2014

She 2 Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). 3 Strickland v. … In McKinney v. State, 207 S.W.3d 366, 374 (Tex. Crim.