Case law

Welch v. State

143 Tex. Crim. 529 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 21, 1941

After getting into the attic, the kidnapper laid some boards across the rafters and on these boards were spread pieces of burlap, upon which the boy was placed. … R. 563 ; Davis v. State, 15 Tex.

Moff v. State

131 S.W.3d 485 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 7, 2004

Brown v. State, 640 S.W.2d 275, 279 (Tex.Crim.App.1982); Garcia v. State, 787 S.W.2d 185, 185 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1990, no. pet.). … Brown v. State, 640 S.W.2d 275 (Tex.Crim.App.1982). 23 . Id. at 279. 24 . 533 S.W.2d 812 (Tex.Crim.App.1976). 25 . Id. at 815. 26 . 524 S.W.2d 689 (Tex.Crim.App.1975). 27 .

Terry v. State

141 Tex. Crim. 585 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 26, 1941

See also Walker v. State, 88 Texas Cr. R. 389; Albrecht v. State, 85 Texas Cr. R. 519; Temple v. State, 15 Texas Cr. App. 304; and many other cases might be cited in support of the doctrine above mentioned. See Smith v. … Dora Ruth Brown, a sister of the defendant.

Sleet v. State

110 Tex. Crim. 10 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 23, 1928

The appellant resided at the home of Bertha Brown. He kept his car and his dog there. According to his testimony and that of Bertha Brown, he paid board at the rate of six dollars per week. … See Smelser v. State, 31 Tex. Crim. App. 96; Bradshaw v. State, 61 S. W. 713 ; Childress v. State, 210 S. W. 193 , and cases collated on p. 194. See Branch’s Ann. Tex. P. C, p. 601, Sec. 1059; Koger v. State, 165 S.

Higbie v. State

780 S.W.2d 228 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 11, 1989

See Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 736, 739 , 103 S.Ct. 1535, 1540, 1541 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983). See also United States v. … Brown, 443 U.S. at 50, 51 , 99 S.Ct. at 2640 .

Hofheintz v. State

45 Tex. Crim. 117 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 29, 1903

In Brown v. State, 38 Texas Crim. … reasonable doubt, that defendant did permit his saloon to be open on Sunday for the purposes of traffic within two years prior to November 23, 1902, you must return a verdict of guilty, even though said defendant did have a board

Ex Parte Thorbus

455 S.W.2d 756 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 29, 1970

Ped-roza v. State, 97 Tex.Cr.R. 621 , 263 S.W. 283 ; Stockman v. State, 135 Tex.Cr.R. 337 , 120 S.W.2d 267 ; Brown v. State, 136 Tex.Cr.R. 521 , 126 S.W.2d 992 ; Moody v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 219 S.W.2d 90 . … Washington State Board of Prison, 357 U.S. 214 , 78 S.Ct. 1061 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1269 (1958); Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477 , 83 S.Ct. 768 , 9 L.Ed.2d 892 (1963); Draper v.

Ex Parte Evans

690 S.W.2d 274 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 22, 1985

The department shall provide the Board with sentence time credit information on persons described in this Section. … Same holding in Strader v. Garrison, 611 F.2d 61, 63 (4th Cir.1979), where the defendant was told he would be eligible for parole in 1¼ years instead of the actual 83/i years. The Sixth Circuit, in Brown v.

Farley v. State

91 Tex. Crim. 101 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 8, 1922

able-bodied person who lives without labor and without visible means of support, owns a house of ten rooms in a good locality and under circumstances which support the reasonable inference that it is being run as a respectable boarding … Lewis v. State, 3 Ga. App. 322 ; Miller v. State, 4 Ga. App. 392 ; Leonard v. State, 5 Ga. App. 494 ; Brown v. State, 58 Southern Rep. 794; People v. Warren, 185 Ill. App. 341 .

Collins v. State

502 S.W.2d 743 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 19, 1973

OPINION BROWN, Commissioner. This is an appeal from a conviction for the possession of marihuana. The jury assessed punishment at five (5) years. The sufficiency of the evidence is challenged. … Ramos v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 478 S.W.2d 102 ; Rodriguez v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 372 S.W.2d 541 . Therefore, the evidence must affirmatively link the accused to the contraband. Haynes v.

Sanders v. State

127 Tex. Crim. 55 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 10, 1934

C.; Brown v. State, 14 S. W. (2d) 63 , and authorities cited. The law does not require, however, that the penetration go to the extent of injuring the hymen. … Enfield v. State, supra. If it was carried to the extent of penetration, however slight, the offense was rape. Enfield v. State, supra.

Deeds v. State

474 S.W.2d 718 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 9, 1971

Justice Jackson, writing for the majority, stated in West Virginia State Board of Education v. … West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 , 63 S.Ct. 1178 , 87 L.Ed. 1628 (1943). . Brown v. Louisiana, 383 U.S. 131 , 86 S.Ct. 719 , 15 L.Ed.2d 637 (1966); Garner v.

Williams v. State

668 S.W.2d 692 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 22, 1983

King v. State, 631 S.W.2d 486 (Tex.Cr.App.1982); Brooks v. State, 599 S.W.2d 312 (Tex.Cr.App.1979). … That applies as well to Brown . 10 .

Dozier v. State

143 Tex. Crim. 397 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 14, 1942

C., p. 191, sec. 327; Franks v. State, 139 Tex. Cr. K 42; Brown v. State, 87 S. W. (2d) 720 ; Sanders v. State, 116 Tex. Cr. R 172; Reynolds v. State, 116 Tex. Cr. … See Roberson v. State, 91 S. W. 578 ; Williams v. State, 39 S. W. 664 , 37 Tex. Cr. R. 238 ; Garner v. State, 109 S. W. (2d) 182 , and cases therein cited.

Fowler v. State

157 Tex. Crim. 147 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 13, 1952

247 S.W.2d 393 (1952) FOWLER v. STATE. No. 25700. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. February 13, 1952. Rehearing Denied April 2, 1952. *394 Burks & McNeil, by Clifford W. Brown, Lubbock, for appellant. George P. … Appellant drove up to a house in Lubbock which was being searched by inspectors of the Texas Liquor Control Board.

Brooks v. State

138 Tex. Crim. 526 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 6, 1940

Griffin v. State, 87 S. W. 155 ; Ex parte Brown 34 S. W. 131 . … See Atwood v. State, 96 Tex. Or. R. 249, 257 S. W. 563 ; DeShazo v. State, 97 Tex. Cr. R. 490 , 262 S. W. 764 ; Griggs v. State, 99 Tex. Cr. R. 215 , 268 S. W. 940 ; McLendon v. State, 101 Tex. Cr. R. 128 , 274 S.

Ex parte McCain

153 Tex. Crim. 517 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 24, 1949

It is reflected that appellant is a school teacher, that he was engaged in some controversy with at least some members of the school board, of whom the prosecuting witness was one. … See also Brown v. State, 154 S. W. 2d 464 , and Ex parte Schmidt, 167 S. W. (2d) 1026 .

Fowler v. State

240 S.W.2d 780 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 9, 1951

Brown, of Lubbock, for appellant. George P. Blackburn, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State. DAVIDSON, Commissioner. … Bell v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 240 S.W.2d 302 , and authorities there cited; Cook v. State, 137 Tex.Cr.R. 492 , 132 S.W.2d 404 .

Burnsides v. State

51 Tex. Crim. 399 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 24, 1907

R Brown was introduced for the State,! and he testified that he was city marshal at Weatherford, and that he did not deputize appellant to act for him; that he did deputize Pink Linehart. … It occurrs to us that under said statute, as interpreted in Davis v.

Livingston v. State

589 S.W.2d 395 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 28, 1979

Brown v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 477 S.W.2d 617 . This is because reputation is based on what the accused is thought to be, rather than what the accused is. Brown v. State, 477 S.W.2d 620. … Hurd v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 513 S.W.2d 836 ; Brown v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 477 S.W.2d 617 .