Case law

Brown v. State

147 Tex. Crim. 388 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 10, 1944

to sit in such Criminal District Court in order to dispatch its business, the Governor not having appointed a successor to Judge Grover Adams, appellant’s contentions being the same as were raised in the case of Pierson v.

Brown v. State

507 S.W.2d 235 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 27, 1974

See Basaldua v. State, 481 S.W.2d 851, 853 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Ring v. State, 450 S.W.2d 85 (Tex.Cr.App.1970); Allen v. State, 474 S.W.2d 480 (Tex.Cr.App.1971). … State, 249 S.W.2d 211 (Tex.Cr.App.1952); Bruce v. State, 419 S.W.2d 646 , (Tex.Cr.App.1967); Carter v. State, 400 S.W.2d 571 (Tex.Cr.App.1966); Foster v. State, 422 S.W.2d 447 (Tex.Cr.App.1967); Albrecht v.

Brown v. State

505 S.W.2d 850 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 27, 1974

See Whan v. State, Tex.Cr. App., 485 S.W.2d 275 , and Stanley v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 490 S.W.2d 828 . … In Ayres v.

Brown v. State

523 S.W.2d 238 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 21, 1975

Brown.” It is observed that none of these witnesses were ever asked if they had been among those who had been excused from the Rule by the court. … Banks v. State, supra; Williams v. State, 521 S.W.2d 250 (Tex.Cr.App.1975).

Brown v. State

554 S.W.2d 677 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 29, 1977

In Burns v. State, 556 S.W.2d 270 (Tex.Cr.App., delivered May 3, 1977) and Smith v. State, 540 S.W.2d 693 (Tex.Cr.App.1976), the same contention was raised and it was rejected by this Court. … In Jurek v.

Brown v. State

92 Tex. Crim. 147 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 12, 1922

Pitner v. State, 37 Texas Crim. Rep., 272 ; Dent v. State, 43 Texas Crim. Rep., 126 ; Rozier v. State, 90 Texas Crim. Rep., 337 , 234 S. W. Rep., 666 ; Epps v. State, 91 Texas Crim. Rep., 270 . … Parker v. State, 75 S. W. Rep., 30 ; Dane v. State, 36 Texas Crim. Rep., 87 .

Brown v. State

57 Tex. Crim. 269 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 17, 1909

Joliff v. State, 53 Texas Crim. Rep., 61 ; Breen v. Ry. Co., 44 Texas, 302 ; Giddings v. San Antonio, 47 Texas, 548 ; State v. Parker, 61 Texas, 265 ; Morris v. State, 62 Texas, 728 ; Ratigan v. State, 33 Texas Crim. … With a view of assuring accuracy and to present the matter so it will be readily understood, we copy entirely both the bill and the court’s explanation of same, as follows: “After the defendant, Hood Brown, had by his own

Brown v. State

42 Tex. Crim. 176 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 29, 1900

In King v. … In Shaw v.

Brown v. State

159 Tex. Crim. 306 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 18, 1953

We heretofore held contrary to such contention in Shuffield v. State, 20 S. W. 2d 1057 , and cases there cited. … Morris v. State, 157 Tex. Cr. R. 14 , 246 S. W. 2d 184 . Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Brown v. State

54 Tex. Crim. 121 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 27, 1908

In the case of Taylor v. State, 38 Texas Crim. Rep., 552 ; 43 S. W. … Ware v. State, 36 Texas Crim. Rep., 597 ; Brittain v. State, 36 Texas Crim. Rep., 406 ; Morrison v. State, 39 Texas Crim. Rep., 519 ; 44 S. W. Rep., 511 ; Woodward v. State, 51 S. W. Rep., 1122 ; Barkman v.

Brown v. State

460 S.W.2d 925 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 16, 1970

In Pigg v. State, 162 Tex.Cr.R. 521 , 287 S.W.2d 673 , the owner testified that he “hoped” his automobile had a reasonable value of over $50. … Easley v. State, 167 Tex.Cr.R. 156 , 319 S.W.2d 325 , relied upon by appellant, is not in point.

Brown v. State

140 Tex. Crim. 133 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 12, 1940

Brown v. State

870 S.W.2d 53 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 26, 1994

Brown v. State, 831 S.W.2d 847 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1992). … Brown, 881 S.W.2d at 850-51. Appellant cites Pugh v. State, 376 S.W.2d 760 (Tex.Cr.App.1964), as support for his argument that the re-read testimony was excessive.

Brown v. State

87 Tex. Crim. 261 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 28, 1920

Ross v. State. 10 Texas Crim. App., 458; Peter v. State, 23 Texas Crim. App., 684; Goodman v. State, 4 Texas Crim. App., 349; Williams v. State, 41 Texas Crim. Rep., 365 ; Miers v. State, 34 Texas Crim. … Woods v. State, 3 Texas Crim. App., 204; Maner v. State, 8 Texas Crim. App., 361; Staples v. State, 14 Texas Crim. App., 136.

Brown v. State

52 Tex. Crim. 267 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 11, 1907

Brown v. State

88 Tex. Crim. 55 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 27, 1920

Brown v. State

153 Tex. Crim. 1 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 10, 1948

.; Watson v. State, 148 Tex. Cr. R. 589 , 189 S. W. (2d) 1020 . The intended shooting of one with a pistol is sufficient to authorize the jury to find that the shooting was actuated by malice. Lovelady v. State, 198 S.

Brown v. State

438 S.W.2d 926 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 5, 1969

See Burns v. State, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 183 , 262 S.W.2d 406 . Malice can be inferred from the use of a deadly weapon. Rodriguez v. State, 375 S.W.2d 289 . In Brown v. … Hill v. State, 403 S.W.2d 797 ; Johnson v. State, 379 S.W.2d 329 ; Boyett v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 368 S.W.2d 769 . See 13A Texas Digest Criminal Law @^1120 (3); 5 Tex.Jur.2d 354, Sec. 209. The judgment is affirmed.

Brown v. State

61 Tex. Crim. 334 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 22, 1911

Counts v. State, 19 Texas Crim. App., 450; Hedrick v. State, 40 Texas Crim. Rep., 532 , and cases there cited. 2. … Johnson v. State, 28 Texas Crim. App., 17; Jones v. State, 38 Texas Crim. Rep., 87 ; Merritt v. State, 39 Texas Crim. Rep., 70 . And in Hampton v.

Brown v. State

50 Tex. Crim. 626 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 6, 1907