Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstexcrimapp

9,209 results

3.17s

  • Lamonte Wesley Brown v. State

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 10, 2015

    v. … Riverfront Blvd., 6th Floor Dallas, TX 75207 Cause Number below: F14-34606-V Court Clerk : Sandra Minter Telephone Number: 214.653.5880 Facsimile number: 214.653.5778 Address

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Donald Ray Brown v. State

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Aug 11, 2015

    The case is styled State of Texas v. Donald Brown, Cause No. 11F860-005 3. Appellant was found guilty of two counts of Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child and sentenced to Life on both counts. 4. …  Trial of State of Texas v. Delbert Sisemore was held on June 30-July 1, 2015.  Pre-trial meetings and preparation for the trial of State of Texas v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    167 Tex. Crim. 351 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 11, 1959

    Campbell v. State, 164 Texas Cr. Rep. 172 , 297 S.W. 2d 847 . The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded. Opinion approved by the Court.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    145 Tex. Crim. 503 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 31, 1943

    Brown v. State, 70 S. W. (2d) 192 , 126 Tex. Cr. R. 9 . The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Vanessa Brown v. Sebastian Valiyaparampil

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 3, 2015

    COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § VANESSA BROWN, … No. 08-14-00031-CV § Appellant, Appeal from § v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    170 Tex. Crim. 195 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 9, 1960

    McMillan v. State, 166 Tex. Cr. R. 15 , 310 S.W. 2d 116 ; Dunn v. State, 159 Tex. Cr. R. 520 , 265 S.W. 2d 589 ; Jones v. State, 159 Tex. Cr. R. 24 , 261 S.W. 2d 317 ; and Bills v. State, 258 S.W. 2d 804 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    128 Tex. Crim. 80 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 27, 1935

    Brown did then and there unlawfully sell to R. W. … such allegation, we are constrained to hold that the information is wholly insufficient to charge the offense of which the appellant was convicted, and in support of the views herein expressed we refer to the case of Kirby v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Donald Ray Brown v. State

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 11, 2015

    AT TEXARKANA FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS DONALD RAY BROWN

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    119 Tex. Crim. 12 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 20, 1932

    Ruling Case Law, vol. 8, sec. 330, page 305; Dahlberg v. People, 225 Ill., 485 , 80 N. E., 310 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Travis Shane Brown v. State

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 26, 2015

    FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS V … Appellant’s last known address is: Travis Shane Brown TDCJ #01958914 Hutchins State Jail 1500 East Langdon Road Dallas, Texas 75241 WHEREFORE, PREMISES

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dillard and Brown v. State

    126 Tex. Crim. 292 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 16, 1934

    *293 HAWKINS, JUDGE — Conviction is for burglary; punishment, against Dillard was assessed at three years in the penitentiary, and against Brown at four years in the penitentiary. … Caddell v. State, 49 Texas Crim. Rep., 133 , 90 S. W., 1014 ; Hunt v. State, 89 Texas Crim. Rep., 404 , 231 S. W., 775 . Many authorities are cited in the first case mentioned.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Board v. State

    406 S.W.2d 469 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 8, 1966

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Maddox, Alias Brown v. State

    108 Tex. Crim. 90 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 12, 1927

    See Collins v. State, 77 Tex. Crim. Rep. 156; Cudd v. State, 28 Tex. Crim. Rep. 124; Irby v. State, 69 Tex. Crim. Rep. 619. … Smith v. State, 89 Tex. Crim. Rep. 225; Hinton v. State, 95 Tex. Crim. Rep. 3; Curry v. York, 3 Texas, 360 ; Perkins v. Terrell, 214 S. W. 553 . The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Burnham and Brown v. State

    115 Tex. Crim. 350 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 21, 1930

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Musey, Alias Brown v. State

    116 Tex. Crim. 115 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 2, 1930

    Restating such parts as affect the issue of venue, it was alleged that Brown * * * in the County of Galveston and State of Texas, did then and there * * * keep and was interested in keeping a room * * * for the purpose of

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    71 Tex. Crim. 212 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 27, 1913

    Eecently in the case of Baker v. State, 70 Texas Crim. Rep., 618 , we had this question before us and held the court had no authority to pass sentence upon such a verdict, under the law of this State.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    57 Tex. Crim. 1 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 9, 1908

    The question involved in this record was passed upon by us in the case of Solon v. State, 54 Texas Crim. Rep., 261 , decided at the recent Austin term of this court.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    100 Tex. Crim. 63 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 22, 1925

    .; Dyer v. State, 44 Texas Crim. Rep. 78 . It is observed that the transcript is further defective in that it it not bound with the seal of the court in which the cause was tried, as required by law. See Pittman v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    130 Tex. Crim. 319 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 13, 1936

    See Brite v. State, *322 43 S. W., 342 ; Johnican v. State, 48 S. W., 181 ; Holmes v. State, 156 S. W., 1172 . … See Durham v. State, 16 S. W. (2d) 1092 ; Coffman v. State, 56 Texas Crim. Rep., 75 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    48 Tex. Crim. 158 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 26, 1905

    The State’s evidence sufficiently shows penetration under the rule laid down in Kenney v. State, 9 Texas Ct. Rep., 888. The facts in this case are stronger, for the girl herself testified to a penetration. … The consent of the girl would eliminate the question of assault, while under the case of Croomes v. State, 40 Texas Crim. Rep., 672 , it would not eliminate the question of assault with intent to rape.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.