Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstexcrimapp

9,209 results

0.90s

  • Anderson v. State

    134 Tex. Crim. 144 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 16, 1938

    The testimony on the part of the State was to the effect that V. L. … A similar question was before this Court and was decided adversely to the appellant's contention in the cases of Stevens v. State, 110 S.W.2d 906 , and Wooldridge v. State, 109 S.W.2d 751 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown, Quentez

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 28, 2011

    WR-76,845-01 QUENTEZ BROWN , Relator v. … Dallas County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by: submitting the record on such habeas corpus application; submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to be investigated, see McCree v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Skinner v. State

    364 S.W.2d 700 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 16, 1963

    .; Wortham v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 333 S.W.2d 158 ; Lair v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 333 S.W.2d 389 ; Brown v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 353 S.W.2d 425 ; and Campos v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 356 S.W.2d 317 . … Mays v. State, 165 Tex.Cr.App. 123 , 304 S.W.2d 118 ; and Sullivan v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 354 S.W.2d 168 . The judgment is affirmed.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Pilgrim v. State

    87 Tex. Crim. 6 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 25, 1920

    Davis v. State, 2 Texas Crim. App., 162; Henderson v. State, 20 Texas Crim. App., 304; and other cases collated in Branch’s Annotated Texas Penal Code, see. 602. … Peterson v. State, 70 S. W. Rep., 978 , Denton v. State, 42 Texas Crim. Rep., 427 ; Hare v. State, 56 Texas Crim. Rep., 6 ; Brown v. State, 57 Texas Crim. Rep., 269 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Dudley v. State

    40 Tex. Crim. 31 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 7, 1898

    When the case was called for trial, he filed his application for a continuance on account of the absence of Matt Chandler, Andrew Thomas, John Brown, Abe Bryson, Tom Brown, and Bill Davis. … Sutton v. State, 2 Texas Crim. App., 342; Marshall v. State, 5 Texas Crim. App., 273; Phillips v. State, 22 Texas Crim. App., 139; Nalley v. State, 28 Texas Crim. App., 387; Miller v. State, 31 Texas Crim. Rep., 609 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Terry v. State

    98 Tex. Crim. 540 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 3, 1924

    See Ruling Case Law, Vol. 22, p. 1187, Sec. 19; also p. 1181, Sec. 12; Brown v. State, 7 Amer. & Eng. Ann. Cas., 258; Underhill’s Crim, Ev., 3rd Ed., p. 847, Sec.. 614. … C., Art. 1064, also Brown v. State, 7 A. & E. Ann. Cas., 260. Bishop’s New Crim. Law, 9th Ed., Vol. 2, Sec. 1122, subdivision 5.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • McGrew v. State

    128 Tex. Crim. 238 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 16, 1935

    See Forrester v. State, 109 Texas Crim. Rep., 361 . In the case of Lawrence v. State, 18 S. … Hence the holding in Lawrence v. State, supra, is controlling.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Smith v. State

    42 S.W.2d 787 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 14, 1931

    Kogar v. State, 110 Tex. Cr. R. 636 , 10 S.W.(2d) 546 ; Johnson v. State, 101 Tex. Cr. R. 561 , 275 S. W. 1036 ; Brown v. State, 88 Tex. Cr. R. 55 , 224 S. W. 1105 . Article 818, C. C.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Adams v. State

    524 S.W.2d 67 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 18, 1975

    OPINION BROWN, Commissioner. … Vallejo v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 408 S.W.2d 113 . The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed. Opinion approved by the Court.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Miller v. State

    465 S.W.2d 150 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 17, 1971

    Reliance is had upon the dissent in which the writer joined in Dorsey v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 450 S.W.2d 332 . … All paroles shall issue upon order of the Board, duly adopted and approved by the Governor.”

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Chambers v. State

    508 S.W.2d 348 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 20, 1974

    These men were seen by non-accomplice witnesses to leave in a beige, or brown, truck with a white or silver colored camper on it. … A brown truck with a white camper with “Chunky” in it was seen leaving the Connellys’ house by a non-accomplice witness.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Martin v. State

    82 Tex. Crim. 199 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 21, 1917

    Crook v. State, 27 Texas Crim. App., 243; Kaufman v. State, 70 Texas Crim. Rep., 438 . … Baker v. State, 70 Texas Crim. Rep., 618 ; Martin v. State, 71 Texas Crim. Rep., 212 ; Brown et al. v. State, 71 Texas Crim. Rep., 212 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown, Charles David

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 5, 2011

    WR-11,971-05 CHARLES DAVID BROWN, Relator v. GRAYSON DISTRICT CLERK , Respondent ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS CAUSE NO. 031156-A IN THE 59 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FROM GRAYSON COUNTY Per curiam. … Grayson County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by: submitting the record on such habeas corpus application; submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to be investigated, see McCree v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fondren v. State

    77 Tex. Crim. 660 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 3, 1915

    (Barker v. State, 47 S- W. Rep., 980.) … He had been working and boarding with me about two or three months, using the room in that manner.”

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Coe v. State

    683 S.W.2d 431 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 21, 1984

    Recently, in Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730 , 103 S.Ct. 1535 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502, 514 (1983), the Supreme Court wrote: “As the Court frequently has remarked, probable cause is a flexible, common-sense standard. … Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 176 [ 69 S.Ct. 1302, 1311 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 ] (1949).” Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730 , 103 S.Ct. 1535 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502, 514 (1983). In United States v.

    Cited 153 timesPublished
  • Taylor v. State

    74 Tex. Crim. 3 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 15, 1914

    From time to time while appellant and his wife were boarding and rooming at Silliman's, appellant abused, struck and whipped some of Silliman's children. … Crim. 127 ; Brown v. State, 61 Tex.Crim. Rep.; Reagan v. State, 70 Tex.Crim. Rep., 157 S.W. Rep., 483 ; Smith v. State, 44 S.W. Rep., 520 ; Crews v. State, 34 Tex. Crim. 533 ; Young v. State, 54 Tex.Crim. Rep.; Red v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Brown, Lee Roy

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 13, 2012

    WR-57,998-02 LEE ROY BROWN, Relator v. DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK, Respondent ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS CAUSE NO. F-0100206-QT IN THE 283RD DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY Per curiam . … Dallas County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by submitting the record on such habeas corpus application, submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to be investigated ( see McCree v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Royal v. State

    448 S.W.2d 470 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 12, 1969

    The affidavit is identical in all material respects to that which we upheld in Brown v. … See also: McCray v. Illinois, 386 U.S. 300 , 87 S.Ct. 1056 , 18 L.Ed.2d 62 ; Rugendorf v. United States, 376 U.S. 538 , 84 S.Ct. 825 , 11 L.Ed.2d 887 ; Artell v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 372 S.W.2d 944 ; Bosley v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Brown, Wilson Emelsy

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 5, 2012

    WR-23,125-08 WILSON EMELSY BROWN, Relator v. KENT COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK, Respondent ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS CAUSE NO. 729 IN THE 39th DISTRICT COURT FROM KENT COUNTY Per curiam . … Kent County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by submitting the record on such habeas corpus application, submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to be investigated ( see McCree v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown, Wilson Emelsy

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 8, 2012

    WR-23,125-07 WILSON EMELSY BROWN, Relator v. KENT COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK , Respondent ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS CAUSE NO. 729 IN THE 39th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FROM KENT COUNTY Per curiam. … Kent County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by: submitting the record on such habeas corpus application; submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to be investigated, see McCree v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.