Case law

Autrey v. State

113 Tex. Crim. 567 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 5, 1930

See Sparks v. State, 300 S. W. 939 ; Brown v. State, 101 Tex. Crim. Rep. 639; Howell v. State, 94 Tex. Crim. Rep. 563; Rees v. State, 13 S. W. (2d) 108 .

Cunningham v. State

118 Tex. Crim. 235 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 5, 1930

We do not think *237 the conclusion reached by us in anyway in conflict with that announced in Brown v. State, 376 S. W., 906 . The judgment will be affirmed. Affirmed. Hawkins, Judge, absent.

Pretre v. State

112 Tex. Crim. 459 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 27, 1929

Brown, there situate.” … Johnson v. State, supra.

Ward v. State

591 S.W.2d 810 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 9, 1980

The appellant relies upon Brown v. … The rule from Brown v. State, 477 S.W.2d 617 (Tex.

Walter v. State

28 S.W.3d 538 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 20, 2000

Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 357 , 88 S.Ct. 507, 514 , 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967). . Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 738-39 , 103 S.Ct. 1535, 1541 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983). . Horton v. … Ramos v. State, 934 S.W.2d 358, 365 (Tex.Crim.App.1996). . Horton, 496 U.S. at 136 , 110 S.Ct. at 2308 . . Minnesota v. Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366, 375 , 113 S.Ct. 2130, 2137 , 124 L.Ed.2d 334 (1993). . See Whren v.

Aguierre v. State

31 Tex. Crim. 519 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 4, 1893

Proc., art. 746; Wilson v. The State, 27 Texas Ct. App., 47; Smith v. The State, 27 Texas Ct. App., 50; Miller v. The State, 27 Texas Ct. App., 497; Brookin v. The State, 27 Texas Ct. App., 701; Grandison v. … Law, p. 794, and note 5; Regina v. Browning, 3 Cox Crim. Cases, 437. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded. Reversed and remanded. Judges all present and concurring.

Halbadier v. State

87 Tex. Crim. 129 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 24, 1920

Again, in the ease of Brown v. … Likewise, in Gamble v. Butchee, 87 Texas, 643 , the lamented Chief Justice Brown reaffirmed the rule that the requirement of the law meant simply two witnesses competent to testify to the execution of the will.

Salinas v. State

507 S.W.2d 730 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 3, 1974

See Cyrus v. State, 500 S.W.2d 656 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Lee v. State, 496 S.W.2d 616 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Luna v. State, 493 S.W.2d 854 (Tex.Cr.App.1973) ; Hice v. State, 491 S.W.2d 910 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Kilburn v. … What we said in Jones v.

Turner v. State

462 S.W.2d 9 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 26, 1969

For example, a man put a bomb on an airplane where his mother was on board to blow it up, and he gets the Insurance, and the evidence shows that he is not insane, could you sit as a member of the jury in a case like that … The same is true as to the dicta contained in Barton v. State, 88 Tex.Cr.R. 368 , 227 S.W. 317 , 13 A.L.R. 147 . Brown v.

Fuentes v. State

991 S.W.2d 267 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 28, 1999

Brown, 479 U.S. 538 , 107 S.Ct. 837 , 93 L.Ed.2d 934 (1987)(upholding anti-sympathy charges), because he challenges the instruction as a comment on the weight of the evidence. In Green v. … Brown, 479 U.S. at 543 , 107 S.Ct. 837 .

Ex Parte Lewis

892 S.W.2d 4 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 14, 1994

ANALYSIS OF THIRD-PARTY CONTENTION In Martin v. … In the instant case, the Board would not even be bound by the judgment’s restitution entry when deciding appropriate conditions in the event of applicant’s release on parole or mandatory supervision.

Brown, Larry Glen

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 23, 2012

WR-77,672-01 LARRY GLEN BROWN , Relator v. BRAZOS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK , Respondent ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS CAUSE NO. 06-06486-CRF-361 IN THE 361 ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FROM BRAZOS COUNTY Per curiam. … Brazos County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by: submitting the record on such habeas corpus application; submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to be investigated, see McCree v.

Vining v. State

66 Tex. Crim. 316 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 19, 1910

In support of this we are cited to White v. State, 13 Texas Crim. App., 259. … The law has otherwise held in this State, Mathis v. State, 39 Texas Crim. Rep., 549 .; Darity v. State, 38 Texas Crim. Rep., 546 .

Brown, Lee Roy

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 13, 2012

WR-57,998-02 LEE ROY BROWN, Relator v. DALLAS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK, Respondent ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS CAUSE NO. F-0100206-QT IN THE 283RD DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY Per curiam . … Dallas County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by submitting the record on such habeas corpus application, submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to be investigated ( see McCree v.

McGlynn v. State

704 S.W.2d 18 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 15, 1982

See generally Prochaska v. State, 587 S.W.2d 726 (Tex.Cr.App.1979). Since the rule reiterated in Brown v. … Brown v. State, 507 S.W.2d 235, 238 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Albrecht v. State, 424 S.W.2d 447 (Tex.Cr.App.1968). 4 .

Brown, Lonnie

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 9, 2014

WR-81,138-01 IN RE LONNIE BROWN, Relator ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS CAUSE NO. A-36,453 IN THE 70TH DISTRICT COURT FROM ECTOR COUNTY Per curiam . … Ector County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by submitting the record on such habeas corpus application, submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to be investigated ( see McCree v.

Connally, Reginald Keith

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 6, 2013

Morrissey v. Brewer , 408 U.S. 471 (1972); Ex parte Snow , 899 S.W.2d 201, 202 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). … decision in accordance with the Board's rules.

Thomas v. State

519 S.W.2d 430 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 26, 1975

OPINION BROWN, Commissioner. The conviction is for murder with malice; the punishment was assessed by the jury at life imprisonment. … Minter v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 505 S.W.2d 581 .

Green v. State

94 Tex. Crim. 637 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 25, 1923

The State contends that these are not soundly in point and cites Estrada v. State, 15 S. W. Rep. 645 ; *639 McMahan v. State, 16 S. W. Rep. 171 ; Brown v. State, 58 S. W. Rep. 130 ; Carter v. State, 75 Texas Crim. … In McConnell v. State, 82 Texas Crim.

Fondren v. State

77 Tex. Crim. 660 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 3, 1915

(Barker v. State, 47 S- W. Rep., 980.) … He had been working and boarding with me about two or three months, using the room in that manner.”