Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
9,209 results
1.24s
523 S.W.3d 103 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 8, 2017
Brown v. Chicago Board of Education, 824 F.3d 713, 714 (7th Cir. 2016). He even went so far as to suggest that judges should be given a stamp that says, “stupid but constitutional.” Id. … Teague v.
Cited 122 timesPublished92 Tex. Crim. 424 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 18, 1922
The four head consisted of one white jersey, one fawn, and two light-brown jerseys. … Tollett v. State, 44 Texas, 95; Hogan v. State, 13 Texas Crim. App., 335; Wilson v. State, 100 S. W. Rep., 153 ; Moore v. State, 91 Texas Crim. Rep., 46 , 237 S. W. Rep., 258 .
Cited 8 timesPublished491 S.W.2d 415 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 7, 1973
Martin v. State, 452 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex.Cr.App.1970), and cases there cited. The decision of the trial court not to grant probation is not appealable. Jackson v. … Brown v. State, 478 S.W.2d 550 (Tex.Cr.App.1972).
Cited 19 timesPublished170 Tex. Crim. 30 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 29, 1959
Stephens v. State, 49 Tex. Cr. R. 489 , 93 S.W. 545 . … Hamer v. State, 60 Tex. Cr. R. 341 , 131 S.W. 813 . People v.
Cited 11 timesPublished511 S.W.2d 531 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 12, 1974
In Brown v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 481 S.W.2d 106 , this court cited People v. … In Brown , as in the instant case, a search of the vehicle revealed contraband. It is a well established rule of law that a search cannot be justified by what it uncovers, e. g., Whiteley v.
Cited 37 timesPublished449 S.W.2d 480 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 10, 1969
Brown v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 438 S.W.2d 926 . See 4 Branch’s Ann.P.C.2d, Sec. 2189, p. 534; 29 Tex.Jur.2d 300, 302, Sec. 189, notes 13-14. … Quintana v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 441 S.W.2d 191 ; Smith v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 437 S.W.2d 835 . See Siros v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 399 S.W.2d 547 . Powers v.
Cited 10 timesPublished159 Tex. Crim. 141 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 27, 1954
The offense is the possession of barbiturates (a violation of Section 3(e) of Article 726c, V. A. P. C.); the punishment, 30 days in jail and a fine of $250.00. … We have recently in Soileau v. State, 156 Tex. Cr. Rep. 544, 244 S. W. 2d 224 , and in Brown v.
Cited 3 timesPublished552 S.W.2d 444 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 8, 1977
Appellant then handed Mull five papers containing a brown substance. Mull in turn gave him $25.00. … Board v. State, 122 Tex.Cr.R. 487 , 56 S.W.2d 464 (1933); Bailey v. State, 365 S.W.2d 170 (Tex.Cr.App.1963).
Cited 123 timesPublished53 Tex. Crim. 474 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 13, 1908
We think that the conclusion here reached is not at variance with the decision in the case of Ladwig v. State, 40 Texas Crim. Rep., 585 . … In the case of Wade v. State, 53 Texas Crim. Rep., 608 , 108 S. W.
Cited 0 timesPublished469 S.W.2d 576 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 9, 1971
In Mayberry v. … Dunn, supra, also cites Harrell, alias Pryor v. State, 22 Tex.App. 692 , 3 S.W. 479 and Brown et al. v. State, 6 Tex.App. 188 .
Cited 2 timesPublished146 Tex. Crim. 212 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 19, 1943
See Parish v. State, 85 Tex. Cr. R. 75 , 209 S. W. 678 .” Judge Christian has said in Cubit v. State, 54 S. … And, from Minor v. State, 108 Tex. Cr. R. 1 , 299 S.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBohannan, Ex Parte Michael Wayne
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 11, 2011
Deleon v. Dist. Clerk , 187 S.W.3d 473 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (quoting Winters v. Presiding Judge of the Crim. Dist. Court No. Three , 118 S.W.3d 773, 775 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003)); see also Dickens v. … V § 5).
Cited 0 timesPublished138 Tex. Crim. 654 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 27, 1940
Conviction is for selling whisky in Brown County, Texas, which is alleged to have been dry area; punishment assessed being a fine of $175.00. … Burns, Sr., v. State, opinion dismissing appeal of this date, and the appeal in the present cause is dismissed for the same reason.
Cited 0 timesPublished502 S.W.2d 699 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 19, 1973
Collini v. State, supra; Adair v. State, supra; Harvey v. State, supra. … He shined his flashlight into the car and observed the brown sack extending out from under the front seat. The search of the vehicle at the time was limited to an examination of the sack.
Cited 27 timesPublished53 Tex. Crim. 439 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 6, 1908
This, as we understand, is the plain holding of the court in the case of Brown v. State, 18 Texas Crim. App., 326. … (Moss v. Riddle, 5 Cranch, 351 ; Blume v. Bowman, 2 Ired. L. (N. C.), 338; State v. Chrisman, 2 Ind., 126 ; Perry v. Patterson, 5 Humph. (Tenn.), 133.)
Cited 2 timesPublished573 S.W.2d 784 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 21, 1978
E. g., Hielscher v. State, 511 S.W .2d 305 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Barber v. State, 127 Tex.Cr.R. 582 , 78 S.W.2d 183 (1935); Brown v. State, 126 Tex.Cr.R. 449 , 72 S.W.2d 269 (1934); Russell v. … State, 108 Tex.Cr.R. 308 , 300 S.W. 74 (1927); Taylor v. State, 27 Tex.App. 463 , 11 S.W. 462 (1889); Lehman v. State, 18 Tex. App. 174 (1885).
Cited 4 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Smith v. Blackwell
500 S.W.2d 97 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 10, 1973
Vance v. Clawson, supra. … He also was given the author *101 ity to remit fines and forfeitures upon recommendation of the Board.
Cited 114 timesPublished647 S.W.2d 672 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 30, 1983
Revisiting principles applied in Chimel v. … Accordingly, searches of the brown canvas zipper bag and of the little black film canister within the bag are not within the scope of a search permissible under the “bright line” rule of New York v.
Cited 14 timesPublished35 Tex. Crim. 540 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 11, 1896
See Com. v. Costello, 120 Mass, 358, approved in Costley v. State, 14 Tex. Crim. App., 156. … See Phillips v. State, 6 Tex. Crim. App., 364.
Cited 15 timesPublished118 Tex. Crim. 235 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 5, 1930
We do not think *237 the conclusion reached by us in anyway in conflict with that announced in Brown v. State, 376 S. W., 906 . The judgment will be affirmed. Affirmed. Hawkins, Judge, absent.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna