Case law

Curry v. State

465 S.W.2d 154 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 7, 1971

The pistol was in open view, on the floor board of the car and within reach of appellant. … See Lewis v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 439 S.W.2d 351 ; Courtney v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 424 S.W.2d 440 . To the extent that Jones v. State, supra, and Summerville v.

Lamb v. State

170 Tex. Crim. 23 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 5, 1960

As a member of the school board, Chenault was one of the special owners of the burglarized premises. Ricks v. State, 41 Tex. Crim. R. 676, 56 S.W. 928 . … P.C. 2d Ed. sec. 2514, p. 884; Stoddard v. State, 120 Tex. Crim. R. 52, 49 S.W. 2d 748 .

Flores, Ramiro Jr.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 15, 2004

See Brown v. State , 921 S.W.2d 227, 231 (Tex. Crim. … Brown v. Stat e at 231. 5. Ramon v. State , No. 04-02-00219-CR, 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 7892 (Tex. App. - San Antonio, September 10, 2003)(not designated for publication). 6. Id., slip op. at 6.

Harris v. State

489 S.W.2d 303 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 17, 1973

The Board or Administrator is authorized to issue Wine and Beer Retailer’s Permits. … Texas Liquor Control Bd. v. Super Savings Stamp Co., Civ.App., 303 S.W.2d 536 , ref. n.r.e.; Texas Liquor Control Board v. Floyd, Civ.App., 117 S.W.2d 530 .

Thomas v. State

527 S.W.2d 567 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 23, 1975

OPINION BROWN, Commissioner. The conviction is for sale of heroin; the punishment, assessed by the jury, ninety-nine years’ imprisonment. The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged. … Appellant relies primarily on Rodriquez v.

Webb, Dempsey

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jul 24, 2019

CR22581-A IN THE 35TH DISTRICT COURT FROM BROWN COUNTY Per curiam. … Webb v. State, No. 11-14-00186-CR (Tex. App. Brown June 23, 2016) (not designated for publication).

Ward v. State

88 Tex. Crim. 451 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 9, 1921

Brown, Attorney for the State, that since the appeal was prosecuted, the appellant died. * The effect of his death was to abate the appeal. March v. State, 5 Texas Criminal Appeals, 450.

Ward v. State

227 S.W. 947 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 9, 1921

Brown, attorney for the state, that since the appeal was prosecuted the appellant died. The effect of his death was to abate the appeal. March v. State, 5 Tex. App. 450.

Loller v. State

143 Tex. Crim. 423 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 25, 1942

Brown v. State, 11 Tex. App. 451; Pittman v. State, 14 Tex. App. 576; Bell v. State, 18 Tex. App. 53; Smith v. State, 103 Tex. Cr. R. 228 ; 280 S. W. 581 . Under the above authorities, the complaint is sufficient.

Ussery v. State

651 S.W.2d 767 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 11, 1983

Our next determination must then be whether the appellant’s confession was obtained as a result of the illegal arrest. 4 The Supreme Court in Brown v. … Brown v. Illinois, supra; Dunaway v. New York, supra; Taylor v. Alabama, — U.S. —, 102 S.Ct. 2664 , 73 L.Ed.2d 314 (1982).

James v. State

52 Tex. Crim. 21 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 30, 1907

See Watson v. State, 50 S. W. Rep., 340 ; also Brown v. State, 11 Texas Crim. App., 451. Therefore, it is immaterial whether the county attorney signed the name of the foreman before, or after the trial began.

Perry v. State

69 Tex. Crim. 644 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 26, 1913

(Cudd v. State, 28 Texas Crim. App., 124; Abrigo v. State, 29 Texas Crim. App., 143; Crass v. State, 30 Texas Crim. App., 480; Shuman v. State, 34 Texas Crim. Rep., 69 .) … (Brown v. State, 57 Texas Crim. Rep., 570 .) Also the charge on alibi. In fact, the court’s charge fully submits every issue raised by the testimony, and the judgment should be affirmed.

Barnes v. State

130 Tex. Crim. 547 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 3, 1936

C., sec. 1879; Kirklin v. State, 164 S. W., 1016 . We quote from 4 Texas Jur., 819: “If the indictment omits to allege that the house was insured, evidence as to insurance is incompetent. … Moore v. State, 146 S. W., 184 . Brown v. State, 150 S. W., 488 . Crowder v. State, 177 S. W., 501 .”

State Ex Rel. Smith v. Blackwell

500 S.W.2d 97 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 10, 1973

Vance v. Clawson, supra. … He also was given the author *101 ity to remit fines and forfeitures upon recommendation of the Board.

Creed v. State

69 Tex. Crim. 464 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 5, 1913

Browning, being absent, the attorneys in attendance on court legally elected Hon. Jno. W. … Byrd v. State, 53 Texas Crim. Rep., 507 ; Romero v. State, 56 Texas Crim. Rep., 435 ; Sebastian v. State, 44 Texas Crim. Rep., 508 ; Shields v. State, 38 Texas Crim. Rep., 252, *468 [Rehearing denied April 2, 1913.

Ex Parte Hallmark

883 S.W.2d 672 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 15, 1994

In Grimes v. State, 807 S.W.2d 582 (Tex.Cr.App.1991), we disavowed the “substantial protections” concept used in Ex Parte Rutledge, and adopted the analysis in Collins v. … Unlike the Florida statute in Weaver v.

Chandler v. State

103 Tex. Crim. 490 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 3, 1926

Among those cited are Bowers v. State, 71 S. W. 284 . Brown v. State, 120 S. W. 444 . Vick v. State, 159 S. W. 50 . … Wellhausen v. State, 30 Tex. Crim. Rep. 626, 18 S. W. 300 . Dimry v. State, 41 Tex. Crim. Rep. 273; 53 S. W. 853 . Collins v. State, 171 S. W. 730 .

Aldridge v. State

482 S.W.2d 171 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 21, 1972

Brown v. United States, 125 U.S.App.D. C. 43, 365 F.2d 976 ; United States v. One Cadillac Hardtop, D.C., 224 F.Supp. 210 . This is true even if no specific statement of fact of the second arrest is made. Brown v. … Relying upon Culmore v. State, 447 S.W.2d 915 (Tex.Crim.App.1969) and Brock v.

Barry v. State

39 Tex. Crim. 240 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 27, 1898

Some of the spaces had collar buttons, worth about 5 cents per dozen. • One of the witnesses testified that he had heard it called a “Cheap John Board,” and also a “Cheap John Wheel.” … See State v. Randle, 41 Texas, 292; Randle v. State, 42 Texas, 580 . If the section of article 5049, above quoted, was intended to license lotteries, then it is clearly unconstitutional and void.

Whitaker v. State

977 S.W.2d 595 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 20, 1998

Santellan v. State, 939 S.W.2d 155, 171 (Tex.Cr.App.1997); and, Walbey v. … This precedent was called into question in Brown v.