Case law

Long v. State

535 S.W.3d 511 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 28, 2017

And, the two sets of doors at the entry to the locker room showed a design establishing an additional layer of privacy protection to those inside the room. … That medical records have not been given the absolute protection of a privilege does not mean they might not possess the qualified protections embodied by the Fourth *538 Amendment. 160 Notably, >we were not concerned, in

Suniga, Brian

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 1, 2017

App. 2000) (“Since the trial court implicitly found [a witness] qualified as an expert, the State had no burden to invoke an exception to the hearsay rule.”). … Fisher, 816 F.3d 296, 309-10 (5th Cir. 2016) (holding that Bullcoming did not clearly establish as federal law that the State could not introduce a forensic lab report containing the testimonial certification of an analyst

Mohammed Fawwaz Shoukfeh, M.D., P.A., D/B/A Texas Cardiac Center v. James G. Grattan and Texas Workforce Commission

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 1, 2015

Here, Grattan’s employment agreement provides for the deduction of expenses pursuant to a clearly enunciated formula. See CR 206-08. … The TWC clearly considered parol evidence without identifying any provision within the agreement as ambiguous. See CR 351-53.

Suniga, Brian

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 6, 2019

App. 2000) (“Since the trial court implicitly found [a witness] qualified as an expert, the State had no burden to invoke an exception to the hearsay rule.”). … Fisher, 816 F.3d 296, 309-10 (5th Cir. 2016) (holding that Bullcoming did not clearly establish as federal law that the State could not introduce a forensic lab report containing the testimonial certification of an analyst

Ex Parte Martinez, Jr.

66 Tex. Crim. 1 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 27, 1912

This was as clearly a case of duress as can be found in the history of criminal jurisprudence. … This was clearly not done in the trial of applicant before the lower court. 3.

Morgan v. State

688 S.W.2d 504 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 6, 1985

With the above qualifying remarks, I join the majority opinion. … Under the procedure established in every guilty plea before the court in a felony case, the State was required to introduce evidence showing the guilt of the defendant.

in Re Tara Brook Tyndell

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 28, 2015

Movants request that, if the Court finds iliat any part of ilie order sought to be enforced is not specific enough to be enforced by contempt, the Court enter a clarifYing order more clearly specifYing the duties imposed … A PEACE OFFICER WHO RELIES ON THE TERMS OF A COURT ORDER AND THE OFFICER'S AGENCY ARE ENTITLED TO THE APPLICABLE IMMUNITY AGAINST ANY CLAIM, CIVIL OR OTHERWISE, REGARDING THE OFFICER'S GOOD FAITH ACTS PERFORMED IN THE SCOPE

Mark P. Hardwick, Individually and D/B/A Mark P. Hardwick Oil and Gas Properties and Mark P. Hardwick, LLC v. Smith Energy Company, on Its Own Behalf and on Behalf of Smith Energy Resource Oil, Ltd., a Texas Limited Partnership, and on Behalf of Smith Energy Partners I, Ltd., a Texas Limited Partnership

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 9, 2015

A fact may be established by direct evidence or by circumstantial evidence or both. … After closing arguments, one qualified juror was dismissed, one alternate was released, and the remaining 12 qualified jurors deliberated the case.

Routier v. State

112 S.W.3d 554 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 21, 2003

The Court of Appeals held that the tapes could be used to establish the pages and lines of the depositions and that the record could be supplemented with the parts of the depositions. Id. at 343 . … Further, the unavailability of the record through no fault of the appellant is not immune from a harm analysis.

Nancy Higginson, Debbie Cheadle, Edward Cheadle, Arthur Cheadle, Wayne Carson, Finney Cheadle, Cheryl Shoop, and Keith Sawaya v. Raeanne Martin

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 18, 2015

The rationale for vacating an arbitration award in these circumstances was clearly and succinctly explained in Bakers Union Factory No. 326 v. ITT Continental Baking Company, Inc., 749 F.2d 350 (6th Cir. 1984). … to be a shareholder of an S-Corp, and the trust terminates before the time at which the trust would cease to be a qualified shareholder of an S-Corp..

Renteria, David Santiago

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 4, 2011

Following this exchange, defense counsel challenged Bryan for cause, arguing that Bryan “clearly stated that he would favor the State.” … It is the province of this jury to determine and he’s not been qualified as an expert in this area.

Renteria, David Santiago

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 4, 2011

Following this exchange, defense counsel challenged Bryan for cause, arguing that Bryan "clearly stated that he would favor the State." … It is the province of this jury to determine and he's not been qualified as an expert in this area.