Case law

Malik v. State

953 S.W.2d 234 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 10, 1997

Brown v. Collins, 937 F.2d 175, 182 (5th Cir.), rehearing en banc denied, 945 F.2d 403 (1991). Instead, it is “a state procedural nuance foreign to federal constitutional norms.” Id. at 181. … Brown, 937 F.2d at 182 .

Brooks v. State

154 Tex. Crim. 512 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 22, 1950

When she boarded a bus in the direction of Marshall, in a dry area, they followed her. … See Jones v. State, 153 Tex. Cr. R. 551 , 223 S. W. 2d 27 . Nothing else is presented for our consideration and the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

McClure v. State

95 Tex. Crim. 53 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 21, 1923

Phelps v. State, 15 Texas Crim. Rep., 55 ; Weathersby v. State, 29 Texas Crim. App. 307; Pace v. State, 20 S. W. Rep. 763 ; Proctor v. State, 54 Texas Crim. Rep. 260 ; Eggleston v. State, 59 Texas Crim. … Rep., 551 ; Jones v. State, 85 Texas Crim. Rep., 538 .

Dickhaut v. State

493 S.W.2d 223 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 25, 1973

He further testified that the rear door of the van was opened and appellant took a brown paper sack from the van and handed it to another person. … Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 , 90 S.Ct. 1975 , 26 L.Ed.2d 419 , and Draper v. United States, supra, were construed by this Court in Harris v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 486 S.W.2d 88 .

Meek v. State

790 S.W.2d 618 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 23, 1990

Several State cases are also on point: Shiflet v. State, 732 S.W.2d 622 (Tex.Cr.App.1985); Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779 (Tex.Cr.App.1987); Brown v. State, 475 S.W.2d 938 (Tex.Cr.App.1971); Dancy v. … Brown, 475 S.W.2d at 951 . Dancy is very similar to the Shiflet case cited above.

Procell v. State

172 Tex. Crim. 247 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 18, 1962

Hargiss v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 339 S.W.2d 538 ; Smith v. State, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 351 , 264 S.W.2d 106 ; Brown v. State, 135 Tex.Cr.R. 3 , 117 S.W.2d 107 .

Whittington v. State

86 Tex. Crim. 1 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 25, 1919

We are of opinion under the cases of Brown v. State, 65 S. W. Rep., 912 ; Horn v. State, 50 Texas Crim. Rep., 404 , and Logan v. State, 54 Texas Crim. Rep., 74 , that the court was in error in not quashing the venire. … It does not show that degree of diligence to secure the attendance of the venire which the law requires,” citing Horn v. State, supra. It is not deemed necessary to set out the various grounds of the motion to quash.

Lee, Franklin Delano

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Aug 21, 2019

App. 1988); Jones v. State, 98 S.W.3d 700 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). … CR24668 from the 35th District Court of Brown County.

McComb v. State

488 S.W.2d 105 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 8, 1972

See Boatright v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 472 S.W.2d 765 . … See Moulton v. State, 486 S.W.2d 334 (1972); Hoover v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 449 S.W.2d 60 .

Pierson v. State

93 Tex. Crim. 242 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 17, 1923

him with the board. … Stat., Vol. 1, p. 720; Thompson v. State, 24 Texas Crim. App., 383; 5 L. R. A. (N. S.) p. 810; Vinson v. State, 55 Texas Crim. Rep., 495 . The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Bennett v. State

394 S.W.2d 804 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 27, 1965

In Picaroni v. … Later, in Hartley, et al., v.

Cabrera v. State

395 S.W.2d 34 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 3, 1965

(By witness) I had received information from a reliable and credible person about 8H5 that the defendant would be in his automobile, a 1960 Pontiac, brown in color, License No. … Sowers v. State, 160 Tex.Cr.R. 456 , 272 S.W.2d 119 ; Wood v. State, 166 Tex.Cr.R. 319 , 313 S.W.2d 615 . The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded. Opinion approved by the court.

Cavanar v. State

99 Tex. Crim. 446 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 24, 1924

See also Brown v. State, 44 S. W. Rep. 175 ; McNeal v. State, 43 S. W. Rep. 792 ; Munger v. State, 57 Texas Crim. Rep. 384 ; Kirkpatrick v. State, 57 Texas Crim. Rep. 17 ; Vernon’s Texas Crim. … Stat., Vol. 2, p. 542, note 29, subdivision 4; Anderson v. State, 83 Texas Crim. Rep. 276 ; Brown v. State, 83 Texas Crim. Rep. 451 ; Branch’s Ann. Texas P. C., p. 134, sec. 209.

Lara v. State

153 Tex. Crim. 84 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 23, 1949

In the recent case of Kennedy v. State, 200 S. … See Hafley v. State, 88 Tex. Cr. R. 51 , 224 S. W. 1099 ; Reynolds v. State, 100 Tex. Cr. R. 508 , 271 S. W. 907 ; Cordill v. State, 83 Tex. Cr. R. 74 , 201 S. W. 181 .

Suiter v. State

118 Tex. Crim. 13 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 17, 1931

Brown v. State, 42 Texas Crim. Rep., 417 , 60 S. W., 548 ; Thompson v. State (Texas Crim. App.), 89 S. W., 1081 ; Fowler v. State, 113 Texas Crim. Rep., 407 , 21 S. W. (2d) 672 ; Tubbs v. State, 50 Texas Crim. … Kearse v. State (Texas Crim. App.), 88 S. W., 364 ; Chambless v. State, 46 Texas Crim. Rep., 1 , 79 S. W., 577 ; Stripling v. State, 47 Texas Crim. Rep., 120 , 80 S. W., 376 ; Brown v. State, 4- 2 Texas Crim.

Retzlaff, Ex Parte Thomas Christopher

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 19, 2004

("[u]nlike parole, which requires that the Board vote in favor of release, the mandatory supervision statute requires that the offender be released absent Board action to the contrary"). 12. Greenholtz v. … App. 2001) (reiterating prior holding that constitutional due process requires Board to give inmates timely advance notice of their review for release on mandatory supervision). 15. Morrissey v.

Procell v. State

172 Tex. Crim. 247 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 18, 1962

Hargiss v. State, 330 S.W. 2d 538 ; Smith v. State, 159 Texas Cr. Rep. 351 , 264 S.W. 2d 108 ; Brown v. State, 135 Texas Cr. Rep. 3 , 117 S.W. 2d 107 .

Henry v. State

729 S.W.2d 732 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 8, 1987

Henry v. State, No. B14-84-592CR, delivered October 10, 1985. … See Cordova v. State (Tex.Cr.App. No. 69,096, delivered March 11,1987). 2 . In Keeton v.

Tuley v. State

151 Tex. Crim. 442 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 7, 1948

We quote from the opinion in Brown v. State, (supra.) . “This court is committed to the proposition that for the purpose of enhancing the punishment a prior conviction may not be used but one time. … See Sigler v. State, 143 Tex. Cr. R. 220 ; 157 S. W. (2d) 903 .” We regard the holding in Brown v. State, (supra) and Sigler v. State (supra) as fundamentally sound and decisive of the question under discussion.

Jarquin v. State

155 Tex. Crim. 140 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 7, 1950

We note from the case of Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U. S. 25 , 93 L. Ed. 1782 , as well as that of Lustig v. United States, 338 U. S. 74 , 93 L. … Brown relative to the district attorney as follows: “That Wm. N.