Case law

Ex Parte Nelson

815 S.W.2d 737 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 18, 1991

Weinstein v. Bradford, 423 U.S. 147, at 149 , 96 S.Ct. 347, at 349 , 46 L.Ed.2d 350, at 353 (1975); Murphy v. Hunt, 455 U.S. 478, at 482 , 102 S.Ct. 1181, at 1183 , 71 L.Ed.2d 353, at 357 (1982). … Honig v. Doe, 484 U.S. 305, at 320 , 108 S.Ct. 592, at 602 , 98 L.Ed.2d 686, at 704 (1988).

Vaughn v. State

145 Tex. Crim. 128 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 2, 1942

On Sunday, March 20, 1942, a State Ranger arrested appellant in front of the court house at Brady, in McCulloch County, without a warrant of arrest therefor, and took him to Brown-wood, in Brown County, and placed him in … We think the case of Abston v. State, 102 S.

Herrin v. State

125 S.W.3d 436 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 18, 2002

See Bigby v. … Gribble v.

McKelvey v. State

159 Tex. Crim. 378 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 18, 1953

263 S.W.2d 774 (1953) McKELVEY v. STATE. No. 26610. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. November 18, 1953. Rehearing Denied January 13, 1954. *775 John Scott, Jr., F.D. Brown, Sam Brown, Lubbock, for appellant. … Williams v. State, 145 Tex.Cr.R. 536 , 170 S.W. 2d 482 ; Hall v. State, 141 Tex.Cr.R. 607 , 150 S.W.2d 404 . A bill of exception appears, complaining of argument of state's counsel.

Enriquez v. State

501 S.W.2d 117 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 14, 1973

The informer advised Officer Helms that the appellant, together with a woman and another man, had heroin in the trunk of a 1964 brown Chevrolet automobile and were attempting to sell it. … They walked toward a 1964 brown Chevrolet automobile. Officer Huerta and one of the agents approached the appellant and the two other parties.

Trimble v. State

132 Tex. Crim. 236 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 6, 1937

O’Neal v. State, 32 Texas Crim. Rep., 42 ; Lovelace v. State, 68 S. W. Rep., 274 ; Woodroe v. State, 50 Texas Crim. Rep., 212 ; Baker v. State, 53 Texas Crim. Rep., 29 ; Gentry v. State, 61 Texas Crim. Rep., 619 . … Rep., 161 ; Jackson v. State, 123 Texas Crim. Rep., 345 ; Bloxom v. State, 86 Texas Crim. Rep., 562 ; Baird v. State, 111 Texas Crim. Rep. 640 .

Blankenship v. State

390 S.W.2d 767 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 5, 1965

Rundell v. State, 90 Tex.Cr.R. 410 , 235 S.W. 908 . … De La O v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 373 S.W.2d 501 . The judgment is affirmed. Opinion approved by the court.

Scheanette v. State

144 S.W.3d 503 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 15, 2004

During your deliberations, you will not consider or discuss any possible action of the Board of Pardons and Paroles or the Governor. … Bone v. State, 77 S.W.3d 828, 833 (Tex.Crim.App.2002); Chambers v. State, 903 S.W.2d 21, 33 (Tex.Crim.App.1995).

Brown, Curtis Charles

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 12, 2011

PD-0903/0904-10 CURTIS CHARLES BROWN, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS COUNTY Per curiam. keasler and hervey, jj., dissent .

Lockhart v. State

32 Tex. Crim. 149 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 13, 1893

Vivian v. The State, 16 Texas Cr. App., 262; Brown v. The State, 28 Texas Cr. App., 65. 2.

Cevilla v. State

515 S.W.2d 676 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 13, 1974

See Jefferson v. State, 486 S.W.2d 782 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Ex parte Watson, 508 S.W.2d 399 (Tex.Cr.App.1974) and Pigg v. State, 508 S.W.2d 652 (Tex.Cr.App.1974) and cases there cited. … State, 486 S.W.2d 370 (Tex.Cr.App.1972), and Ex parte Brown, 477 S.W.2d 552 (Tex.Cr.App.1972). The judgments are reversed, and the causes remanded. DOUGLAS, J., concurs in the result.

Delacerda, Jason

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 30, 2021

He relies on Estelle v. Smith and LaGrone v. State. … Estelle v.

Arguellez v. State

409 S.W.3d 657 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 18, 2013

See Derichsweiler v. State, 348 S.W.3d 906, 914 (Tex.Crim.App.2011). . Illinois v. … ."); State v. Kerwick, 393 S.W.3d 270, 276 (Tex.Crim.App.2013). .Derichsweiler, 348 S.W.3d at 916-17 .

Brooks, Mercedes Jerome

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 6, 2011

PD-1512-10 and PD-1513-10 MERCEDES JEROME BROOKS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE ELEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS BROWN COUNTY Per curiam.

Ex Parte McAtee

586 S.W.2d 548 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 19, 1979

State, 158 Tex.Cr.R. 434 , 256 S.W.2d 97 ; Hill v. State, 158 Tex.Cr.R. 313 , 256 S.W.2d 93 ; Brown v. State, 150 Tex.Cr.R. 386 , 196 S.W.2d 819 ; and Kinney v. State, 45 Tex.Cr.R. 500 , 79 S.W. 570 . … For the sound reasons stated in Carvajal we need not further analyze possible implications of the recently declared principle of jeopardy in Brown v.

Johnson v. State

101 Tex. Crim. 560 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 14, 1925

Brown v. State, 88 Tex. Crim. Rep. 55; 224 S. … This is insufficient to give this court jurisdiction for two reasons; first because the statement that he was charged with violating the Dean Act is insufficient, Reed v. State, 98 Tex. Crim. Rep. 505.

Wright v. State

117 Tex. Crim. 93 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 11, 1931

Bell v. State, 92 Texas Crim. Rep., 342 , 243 S. W., 1095 , with other cases, is cited. … the board, and that appellant’s shoe fitted the tracks.

Ex Parte Ervin

187 S.W.3d 386 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 6, 2005

Ervin v. State, 125 S.W.3d 542 (Tex.App.Houston [1st Dist.] 2002). . Tex. Gov’t Code § 508.149(a)(6). . See Griffith v. State, 116 S.W.3d 782, 787-88 (Tex.Crim.App.2003). . … Laws 5312 , 5315; Griffith v. State, 116 S.W.3d 782, 787 (Tex.Crim.App.2003). . Boykin v. State, 818 S.W.2d 782, 785 (Tex. Crim.App.1991). . Id., at 785-86 . .

Brown, James Earl

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 18, 2009

PD-1493-09 JAMES EARL BROWN, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS MCLENNAN COUNTY Per curiam. Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent .

Greenwood v. State

495 S.W.2d 930 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 20, 1973

The facts have been sufficiently set forth in Wilson v. State, supra, and will not be restated other than to note appellant stipulated “the dark brown, leathery substance described by Lt. … Taylor testified that he found a “brown leather looking type substance”, he believed to be “hash” on appellant’s person. We hold, as we did in Wilson v.