Case law

Brown v. State

55 Tex. Crim. 160 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 20, 1909

Brown v. State

289 S.W. 386 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 3, 1926

Brown (meaning the defendant, Leonard Brown) that, after the indictment was" returned against you in the cause we are now trying, the officers raided your home, found some whisky, and that a complaint has been filed against … Graham v. State, 57 Tex. Cr. R. 104 , 123 S. W. 691 ; Lewis v. State, 59 Tex. Cr. R. 51 , 126 S. W. 1137 ; Keeton v. State, 59 Tex. Cr. R. 316 , 128 S. W. 404 ; Phillips v. State, 59 Tex. Cr. R. 534 , 128 S. W. 1100 .

Brown v. State

77 Tex. Crim. 183 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 16, 1915

Brown v. State, 38 Texas Crim. Rep., 597 , and cases cited in sec. 970 of White’s Ann. Proe. But independent of this, this testimony would he admissible on his plea of suspension of the sentence. … The verdict reads: “We the jury find the defendant, Ernest Brown, guilty of burglary as charged in the indictment, and assess his punishment at two years in the penitentiary.”

Brown v. State

101 Tex. Crim. 421 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 7, 1925

Thompson v. State, 88 Tex. Crim. Rep. 29, 224 S. W. 892 ; Ripley v. State, 58 Tex. Crim. Rep. 489; 126 S. W. 586 ; Johnson v. State, 272 S. W. 783 ; Williams v. State, 272 S. W. 783 ; Skirlock v. State, 272 S. W. 782 .

Brown v. State

96 Tex. Crim. 409 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 23, 1924

Brown in said county and state aforesaid, did then and there unlawfully keep and was then and there interested in keeping a building and room there situate for the purpose of being used as a place *892 to bet and wager and … Cas. 1913C, 536; Chapman v. State, 63 Tex. Cr. R. 513 , 140 S. W. 441 ; George v. State, 65 Tex. Cr. R. 91 , 143 S. W. 621 ; Johnson v. State, 65 Tex. Cr. R. 92 , 143 S. W. 621 ; Shelton v. State, 65 Tex. Cr.

Brown v. State

141 Tex. Crim. 147 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 15, 1941

Brown v. State

85 Tex. Crim. 493 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 18, 1919

In the case of *496 Shannon v. State, 35 Texas Crim. … Fox v. State, 71 Texas Crim. Rep., 318 ; Mason v. State, 79 Texas Crim. Rep., 169 , 183 S. W. Rep., 1156 ; Melton v. State, 47 Texas Crim. Rep., 458 ; Stanley v. State, 81 Texas Crim. Rep., 31 , 193 S. W.

Brown v. State

97 Tex. Crim. 452 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 21, 1924

Brown v. State

135 Tex. Crim. 637 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 14, 1938

Hare v. State, 80 S. W. (2d) 963 ; Hawkins v. State, 115 Texas Crim. Rep. 163 , 29 S. W. (2d) 384 ; Jones v. State, 28 S. W. (2d) 146 .

Brown v. State

101 Tex. Crim. 63 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 11, 1925

Since the rendition of the opinion in Black v. State, 41 Texas Crim.

Brown v. State

135 Tex. Crim. 394 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 2, 1938

The court in his qualification of such bill of exceptions states that the witness Dunsmore and such other person were working for the State Liquor Control Board, and such other party was a boy from this university, going … Stephens v. State, 96 S. W. 7 ; Trinkle v. State, 131 S. W. 583 . Not only is that true, but, where there is no dispute as to the fact of sale, an error in defining the term ‘sale’ is harmless. Homan v.

Brown v. State

171 Tex. Crim. 320 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 24, 1961

No. 2206-2224; Stephen v. State, 163 Tex. Cr. R. 505 , 293 S.W. 2d 789 . Further, another written statement of the appellant which was made on the night of December 14 was introduced in evidence without objection.

Brown v. State

129 Tex. Crim. 82 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 22, 1935

We do not believe that what we have said here is out of harmony with the decision of this court in the case of Cromeans v. State, 129 S. W., 1129 , and the case of Bartlett v. State, 38 S. W. (2d) 103 . … In the case of Parker v. State, 98 Texas Crim. Rep., 209 , 261 S.

Brown v. State

120 Tex. Crim. 95 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 20, 1932

See Edwards v. State, 98 Texas Crim. Rep., 47 , 262 S. W., 742 ; Grant v. State, 95 Texas Crim. Rep., 437 , 254 S. W., 959 ; Dameron v. State, 97 Texas Crim. Rep., 172 , 260 S. W., 855 . … See Branch’s Annotated Penal Code, secs. 117, 184; Howard v. State, 37 Texas Crim. Rep., 498 , 36 S. W., 475 , 66 Am. St. Rep., 812 ; Forrester v. State, 38 Texas Crim. Rep., 245 , 42 S. W., 400 ; Guerrero v.

Brown v. State

94 Tex. Crim. 140 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 4, 1923

Turner v. State, 24 Tex. Crim. App., 12, 5 S. W. Rep., 511 ; Coleman v. State, 26 Tex. Crim. App., 252 9 S. W. Rep., 609 ; Walton v. State, 29 Tex. Crim. App., 162, 15 S. W. Rep., Mason v. State, 47 Tex. Crim. … (Facts similar to instant case); Sedgwick v. State, 57 Tex. Crim. Rep., 420, 123 S. W. Rep., 702 ; Hays v. State, 86 Tex. Crim. Rep., 469, 217 S. W. Rep. 938 .

Brown v. State

402 S.W.2d 168 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 16, 1966

Polk v. State, 172 Tex.Cr.R. 211 , 355 S.W.2d 712 ; Flores v. State, 172 Tex.Cr.R. 73 , 353 S.W.2d 852 . … There is no proof that any testimony was submitted to the jury which the prosecution knew to be false, and the case of Alcorta v. State of Texas, 355 U.S. 28 , 78 S.Ct. 103 , 2 L.Ed.2d 9 , Alcorta v.

Brown v. State

71 Tex. Crim. 45 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 18, 1913

Brown was the clerk. Appellant told Brown that he wanted to purchase a suit case and collar. … Under Huntley v. State, 34 S. W. Rep., 923 , and Riley v. State, 44 S. W. Rep., 498 , we believe that under the facts of this case the requested charge should have been- given. Those cases seem to be directly in point.

Brown v. State

163 Tex. Crim. 527 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 24, 1956

In Carpenter v. State, 153 Tex. Cr. R. 99 , 218 S.W. 2d 207 , this court reannounced the holding in Robertson v. State, 25 Tex.

Brown v. State

108 Tex. Crim. 360 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 30, 1927

. *362 The evidence in the case, in its effect, is not dissimilar from that before the court in the case of Chairez v. State, 98 Tex. Crim. Rep. 433.

Brown v. State

391 S.W.2d 425 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 28, 1965

Brown v. State, 168 Tex.Cr.R. 67 , 323 S.W.2d 954 . We find the evidence sufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict. … Stevenson, Jr., Administrator of the Texas Liquor Control Board, is authorized under Article 3731a, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St., expressly made applicable to criminal cases by Article 704, C. C. P. Fite v.