Case law

Neal v. State

374 S.W.2d 668 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 29, 1964

Appellant identified a board brought into the courtroom as resembling the board used by him in the affray. Detective J. M. … See Clough v.

Rodgers v. State

486 S.W.2d 794 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 25, 1972

Brown v. State, 72 Tex.Cr.R. 33 , 160 S.W. 374 (1913); Ogburn v. State, 101 Tex.Cr.R. 180 , 274 S.W. 638 (1925); Jackson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 482 S.W.2d 864 (1972). … Tsamouris v. State, 472 S.W.2d 141 (Tex.Cr.App.1971); Webb v. State, 460 S.W.2d 903 (Tex.Cr.App.1970); Brown v. State, 402 S.W.2d 168 (Tex.Cr.App.1966).

Ex Parte Dopps

723 S.W.2d 669 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 30, 1986

A “board” is not a deadly weapon per se, nor does the indictment allege that the board was a deadly weapon in the manner of its use. Sec. 1.07(a)(11), V.T.C.A. Penal Code. … Chaney v. State, 494 S.W.2d 813 , 814 n. 1 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Villarreal v. State, 590 S.W.2d 938, 939 (Tex.Cr.App.1979).

Anderson v. State

391 S.W.2d 732 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 16, 1965

and there was a big pool of blood, correction, reddish-brown substance, where the body lay. … Was there any of the reddish-brown substance on the body? “A. Yes, sir.”

Brown, Marvin Dwayne

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 12, 2013

WR-35,259-03 EX PARTE MARVIN DWAYNE BROWN, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. F-1058542-P IN THE 203RD DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY Per curiam . … Brown v. State , No. 05-11-00247-CR (Tex. App.--Dallas 2012, no pet.). In a single ground, Applicant contends that appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because she failed to raise jury charge error.

Brown, Ex Parte Clinton

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 4, 2007

AP-75,651 EX PARTE GORDON BROWN, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 114-1130-00 IN THE 114th DISTRICT COURT FROM SMITH COUNTY Per curiam. … Brown v. State , No. 12-01-00029-CR (Tex. App.-Tyler, March 28, 2001, no pet.). Applicant contends, inter alia , that he was deprived of his right to a direct appeal in this cause.

Coby v. State

518 S.W.2d 829 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 19, 1975

OPINION BROWN, Commissioner. Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault. … In Lee v.

Espinosa v. State

463 S.W.2d 8 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 10, 1971

Parker v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 432 S.W.2d 526 . … See Article 1415 V.A.P.C. and Brown v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 460 S.W.2d 925 . Proof of non-consent by the actual owner is not re *10 quired. Fletcher v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 396 S.W.2d 393 .

McCowan v. State

51 Tex. Crim. 205 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 20, 1907

The piece of cloth or piece of flour sack was found the next day by the witness Brown at the point designated by Jane Malloy, and according to the witness Brown, under that sack, was what he terms manure about the size of … See Puryear v. State, 28 Texas Crim. App., 73, and Josef v. State, 34 Texas Crim. Rep., 446 , and for collation of other authorities, see White’s Annotated Penal Code, section 1143.

Johnson v. State

379 S.W.2d 914 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 20, 1964

Menthea Ann Terry testified that the appellant and Kenneth Craig Johnson drove up to her house at 12:30 A.M. and she got in the back seat of a brown 1959 Bonneville Pontiac. … McCoy v. State, 144 Tex.Cr.R. 309 , 162 S.W.2d 976 , relied upon by the state, supports such holding. In Houston v.

Gray, Thomas Kerr, Iii.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 15, 2004

Brown v. State , 122 S.W.3d 794, 799 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). … Browning v. State , 720 S.W.2d 504, 507 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986). 13. Sutton , 899 S.W.2d at 684 (citing Heard v. State , 665 S.W.2d 488, 490 (Tex. Crim. App. 1984). 14. Heard , 665 S.W.2d at 489 -90 (citing Kessler v.

Castillo v. State

818 S.W.2d 803 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 6, 1991

See Castillo v. State, 810 S.W.2d at 182 n. 2. In Brown v. … United States v. Harris, 403 U.S. 573 , 91 S.Ct. 2075 , 29 L.Ed.2d 723 (1971). See also Hennessey v.

Evans v. State

601 S.W.2d 943 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jul 16, 1980

[Emphasis added] Jurek v. Texas, supra, at 272 , 96 S.Ct. at 2956 , and id. at note 7. In Brown v. … Contrary to this contention, the Court in Brown adopted a broader view of the third punishment issue. Relying on its language in Jurek v.

Bartlett, Roy Bob

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 26, 2008

PENAL CODE § 22.05. 13 Brown v. State, 122 S.W.3d 794, 799-800, n.17 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). … State, supra, at 801. 26 Atkinson v. State, supra, at 24. 27 Brown v.

Pearson v. State

587 S.W.2d 393 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jul 3, 1979

Thus, both the search and trial were conducted prior to the decision in Mincey v. Arizona, supra. At that time the common law “exigency rule” allowed such homicide scene investigations. Brown v. … Arizona, supra, when Brown v. State, supra, was still good law, the disposition of appellant’s first ground of error is controlled by Brown instead of Mincey . The ground of error is overruled.

Webb v. State

739 S.W.2d 802 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 7, 1987

Camara, supra; Terry, supra; Martinez-Fuerte, supra; Brown v. Texas, supra. … These three considerations correspond to the three factors listed in Brown v.

Bain v. State

677 S.W.2d 51 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 19, 1984

See Woodward v. State, supra. See also, King v. … See Woodward v.

Bartlett, Roy Bob

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 26, 2008

See Brown v. … Proc. art. 38.23(a). 25. 224 S.W.3d at 515 , citing Brown v. State , supra , at 801. 26. Atkinson v. State , supra , at 24. 27. Brown v. State , supra , at 801 28.

Saldana v. State

493 S.W.2d 778 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 1, 1973

See Kirven v. State, 492 S.W.2d 468 (Tex.Cr.App.1973) ; Nichol v. State, 480 S.W.2d 222 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Quiroga v. State, 478 S.W.2d 466 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Brown v. State, 478 S.W.2d 550 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Jackson v. … State, 474 S.W.2d 237 (Tex.Cr.App.1971); McNeese v. State, 468 S.W.2d 800 (Tex.Cr.App.1971); Trautschold v. State, 466 S.W.2d 586 (Tex.Cr.App.1971); Martin v. State, 452 S.W.2d 481 (Tex.Cr.App.1970) and Redd v.

Midkiff v. State

151 Tex. Crim. 538 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 10, 1948

Brown,____________ “(No Seal) Fort Bend County, Texas.” A complaint must be sworn to before an officer authorized to administer an oath. Art. 415, C. C. P. The jurat to the instant complaint does not so reflect. … Shurbet v. State, 124 Tex. Cr. R. 50 , 60 S. W. (2d) 791 ; Neely v. State, 144 Tex. Cr. R. 92 , 161 S. W. (2d) 294 .