Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstexcrimapp

9,209 results

0.85s

  • Ashley v. State

    46 Tex. Crim. 471 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 20, 1904

    D. package it does not come within the rule laid down in Bruce v. State, 36 Texas Crim. Rep., 53 ; Sinclair v. State, 77 S. W. Rep., 631 ; nor James v. State, 78 S. W. Rep., 951 . … Treadaway v. State, 43 Texas Crim. Rep., 466 ; Young v. State, 66 S. W. Rep., 567 ; Bills v. State, 3 Texas Ct. Rep., 337.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Tucker v. State

    103 Tex. Crim. 598 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 10, 1926

    Also see Carrier v. State, 271 S. W., 383 . … The views of this court as to a correct charge on this statute have been fully expressed in the following cases: Stoneham v. State, 268 S.W. 156 ; Newton v. State, 267 S.W. 272 ; Caldwell v. State, 273 S. W. 608 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Abbott v. State

    42 Tex. Crim. 8 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 9, 1900

    Loveless v. State, 40 Texas Crim. Rep., 221 . … This exact question was decided by us in Bonner v. State, 38 Texas Criminal Reports, 599.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Sisson v. State

    561 S.W.2d 197 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 8, 1978

    In Brown, supra, quoting from United States v. … In Moffett v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Madeley v. State

    388 S.W.2d 187 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 3, 1965

    Appellant's second motion for rehearing directs attention to the portion of the opinion in Brown v. … I would also direct attention to the following quotation from the opinion in Brown v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Ex Parte Nelson

    84 Tex. Crim. 570 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 12, 1919

    It is said in Carr v. State, 19 Texas Crim. … Camron v. State, 32 Texas Crim. Rep., 180 ; Cyc., vol. 29, p. 1570.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Yates v. State

    509 S.W.2d 600 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 22, 1974

    Appellant cites Brown v. State, 56 Tex.Cr.R. 389 , 120 S.W. 444 ; Hamilton v. State, 83 Tex.Cr.R. 90 , 201 S.W. 1009 , and McAnear v. … Powdrill v. State, 69 Tex.Cr.R. 340 , 155 S.W. 231 (holding in favor of admissibility of the evidence). “Contra: Brown v. State, 56 Tex.Cr.R. 389 , 120 S.W. 444 ; Hamilton v. State, 83 Tex.Cr.R. 90 , 201 S.W. 1009 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Jones v. State

    538 S.W.2d 113 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 30, 1976

    See and compare Brown v. State, 156 Tex.Cr.R. 144 , 240 S.W.2d 310 (1951). The State contends the case before us is controlled by Salinas v. State, 507 S.W.2d 730 (Tex.Cr.App.1974). … See also Jordan v. State, 486 S.W.2d 784 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Satery v. State, 455 S.W.2d 294 (Tex.Cr.App.1970).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Sartain v. State

    171 Tex. Crim. 192 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 19, 1961

    Brown v. State, 156 Tex. Cr. R. 144 , 240 S.W. 2d 310 and Heath v. State, 156 Tex. Cr. R. 563 , 244 S.W. 2d 815 . A written consent is not necessary for the taking of a blood specimen. Mora v. State, 159 Tex. Cr. … Piester v. State, 161 Tex. Cr. R. 436 , 277 S.W. 2d 723 . In Brown v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Pierce v. State

    90 Tex. Crim. 302 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 8, 1921

    Rep., 427 ; Hare v. State, 56 Texas Crim. Rep. 6 , Brown v. State, 57 Texas Crim. Rep. 269 . … Fulcher v. State, 28 Texas Crim. App. 470; Brown v. State, 20 S. W. Rep., 924 ; Laurence v. State, 31 Texas Crim. Rep., 601 , Amer. Digest, Century Edition, Vol. 15, page 933.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Sterling v. State

    800 S.W.2d 513 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 19, 1990

    Brown made plans to go to Lubbock the next day to visit sick relatives. On the morning of July 31, Thomas failed to show up at Brown’s house as planned and Brown was unable to reach Thomas by phone. … Brown proceeded to her sister’s house to see what had gone wrong. When Brown arrived, Thomas’ garage door was up, as it usually was during the day.

    Cited 217 timesPublished
  • Martinez v. State

    473 S.W.2d 520 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 9, 1971

    Therefore, no reversible error is shown, e. g., Fausett v. State, 468 S.W.2d 92 (Tex.Cr.App.1971); Pointer v. State, 467 S.W.2d 426 (Tex.Cr.App.1971) ; Brown v. State, 464 S.W.2d 134 (Tex.Cr.App.1971); Brown v. … Kirby v. Beto, 426 F.2d 258 (5th Cir. 1970); Rushing v. State, 151 Tex.Cr.R. 221 , 206 S.W.2d 252 (1947); Boyer v. State, 128 Tex.Cr.R. 76 , 79 S.W.2d 318 (Tex.Crim.App.1935); Elms v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Davis v. State

    398 S.W.2d 940 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 16, 1966

    Joe Dominguez testified for the state and his testimony is substantially the same as that of the witness Brown. … Beardsley v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 394 S.W.2d 801 ; Brignon v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 399 S.W.2d 810 , dated February 16, 1966; Adams v. United States, ex rel. McCann, 317 U.S. 269 , 63 S.Ct. 236 , 87 L.Ed. 268 ; Juelich v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ex Parte Alegria

    464 S.W.2d 868 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 24, 1971

    Holt v. State, supra. … In Lindsey v.

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • Piper, Maurice Lamar

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 11, 2019

    To support his argument about the requirement for an instruction on involuntary conduct Appellant relies on Brown v. State, 955 S.W.2d 276 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). Brown was charged with aggravated assault. … See Brown, 955 S.W.2d at 281 (Price, J., dissenting).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rollins v. State

    126 Tex. Crim. 545 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 20, 1934

    See Wood v. State, 22 Texas App., 431, 3 S. W., 336 ; Reynolds v. State, 82 Texas Crim. Rep., 443 , 199 S. W., 636 ; Oliver v. State, 81 Texas Crim. Rep., 529 , 197 S. W., 185 ; Calloway v. State, 55 Texas Crim. … Brown, who gave the sheriff authority to search the same.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ferguson v. State

    639 S.W.2d 307 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 15, 1982

    The record reflects that Brown County selects its jurors through the use of the jury wheel system. … See Stephenson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 494 S.W.2d 900 ; Brown v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 475 S.W.2d 938 . Appellants failed to object to the jury panel summoned by the sheriff.

    Cited 57 timesPublished
  • Ex Parte Canada

    754 S.W.2d 660 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 11, 1988

    See also Still v. United States Marshall, 780 F.2d 848 (CA 10 1985). 6 . Worth v. Board of Pardons and Paroles, 146 Ariz. 97 , 703 P.2d 1246 (App.1985); Hines v. … Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Paroles, 491 Pa. 142 , 420 A.2d 381 (1980); State v. Velazquez, 122 Ariz. 81 , 593 P.2d 304 (1979); Williams v. State 450 P.2d 232 (Okla. 1969); cf. People v.

    Cited 99 timesPublished
  • Ex Parte Ruthart

    980 S.W.2d 469 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 28, 1998

    State, 818 S.W.2d 782 (Tex.Crim.App.1991)); see, e.g., State v. Stevenson, 958 S.W.2d 824, 827-28 (Tex.Crim.App.1997)(where statutes unambiguous, court must give effect to plain meaning); Brown v. … Gov't Code § 311.002; Barbee v.

    Cited 47 timesPublished
  • White v. State

    385 S.W.2d 397 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 16, 1964

    Steen v. State, 131 Tex.Cr.R. 532 , 100 S.W.2d 109 . … Stovall v. State, 104 Tex.Cr.R. 210 , 283 S.W. 850 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.