Case law

Moore v. State

83 Tex. Crim. 302 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 24, 1918

Cyc., vol. 2, p. 707; Bennett v. Butterworth, 11 Howard (U. S. Rep.), 669° 13 L. E., 859. The indictment contained two separate offenses, theft and fraudulently receiving stolen property. Brown v. State, 15 Texas Crim. … In the Brown case, 15 Texas Crim.

Rangel v. State

435 S.W.2d 143 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 13, 1968

While the writer of this opinion now realizes, after viewing these various affidavits, that he may have made some seemingly inconsistent observations in the two recent opinions in Brown v. … Such is also the case in Barnes v. Texas, 380 U.S. 253 , 85 S.Ct. 942 , 13 L.Ed.2d 818 , also cited by appellant. I am as concerned now as I was when I prepared the opinion in Brown v.

Walker v. State

397 S.W.2d 432 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 5, 1966

The facts in this case are virtually the same as those in Anderson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 391 S.W.2d 54 . State’s witness, W. J. Cooper, testified that he owned Cooper’s Grocery Store in the City of Garland, Texas. … He also observed a brown satchel on the back floorboard with two prybars protruding therefrom, and another white male lying in the front seat of said suspect vehicle.

Ainsworth v. State

105 Tex. Crim. 212 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Oct 13, 1926

Robbins v. State, 272 S. W. 175 ; Williams v. State, 279 S. W. 466 . Many other authorities could be cited if necessary. … Brewer v. State, 262 S. W. 766 ; Hanks v. State, 269 S. W. 111 ; Hughes v. State, 274 S. W. 151 ; Brown v. State, 242 S. W 218; Brown v State, 276 S. W. 929 .

Ex Parte Bain

568 S.W.2d 356 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jul 19, 1978

Buffing-ton testified he did not pay Campion or Brown anything, but had paid A1 Hernden $1,000.00 and Campion and Brown were associates of Hernden. On June 3, 1977 Brown was allowed to withdraw as counsel. … Conrad v. State, supra; Roberson v. State, supra.

State Ex Relator McNamara v. Clark

79 Tex. Crim. 559 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 15, 1915

Lantry v. Heightstown, 46 N.J. Law, 102; Vought v. Board of Excise Com., 46 Atl. Rep., 686 ; Metropolitan Board v. Barnie, 34 N.Y. 657 ; Powell v. State, 69 Ala. 10 ; LaCross v. Fairfield Co., 50 Conn. 321 ; State v. … If such language gives to the Supreme Court authority, as held by Chief Justice Brown in Hovey v.

Hughes v. State

533 S.W.2d 824 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 3, 1976

Likewise, Allen testified that on November 8, 1974, while Allen was still in his undercover status, appellant delivered to him an aluminum foil package containing a brown powdery substance. … See Elder v. State, 462 S.W.2d 6 (Tex.Cr.App.1971). 3 .Compare Rangel v. State, 464 S.W.2d 858 (Tex.Cr.App.1971).

Stone v. State

111 Tex. Crim. 547 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Dec 12, 1928

and there striking and hitting the said Bura Browning with a baseball bat.” … Bishop’s New Criminal Procedure, Vol. 2, Paragraph 1196; Hart v. State, 15 Tex. Crim. App. 225.

White v. State

116 Tex. Crim. 562 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 7, 1931

App. 574 ; McGee v. State, 21 Tex. Ct. App. 670 ; Taylor v. State, 50 Tex. Cr. R. 362 ; Attaway v. State, 100 Tex. Cr. R. 92 . … See Honse v. Ford, 258 S. W. 527 ; Cobb & Gregory v. Parker, 242 S. W. 1018 .

Ex Parte Fierro

79 S.W.3d 54 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 26, 2002

Brown v. State, 907 S.W.2d 835, 839 (Tex.Crim.App.1995). An exception to this rule exists when the defendant consents to a re-trial or a mistrial is mandated by “manifest necessity.” Arizona v. … Brown , at 840. See also, Ex Parte Little at 66; Hartison v. State, 788 S.W.2d 18, 23-24 (Tex.Crim.App.1990); Torres at 442-43 .

Williams, April Loreace

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Sep 28, 2022

.”); State v. … See Zornes v.

Barker v. State

169 Tex. Crim. 277 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 6, 1960

Appellant relies upon Gilderbloom v. State, 160 Tex. Cr. … In Lenore v. State, 137 Tex. Cr.

Clark v. State

470 S.W.2d 869 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 23, 1971

Now, these things that you describe, the brown bag and watches and claw-hammer, did you observe them on him personally? “A. Yes, sir. “Q. All right. No further questions.” … Brown v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 460 S.W.2d 925 ; Mason v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 459 S.W.2d 855 . See 5 Tex. Jur.2d, Section 39, page 61, and the cases collated under Texas Digest, Criminal Law, Section 693.

Ex Parte Jefferson

681 S.W.2d 33 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 21, 1984

Applying the Blockburger test to a situation very similar to the one in the case at bar, the United States Supreme Court, in Brown v. … Thus, under the reasoning of Brown v. Ohio, supra, applicant could not rightfully be convicted for both the theft and the unauthorized use of Tom Rogers’ pickup truck.

Adair v. State

427 S.W.2d 67 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Mar 27, 1967

Officer Brown agreed to take him home. … Officer Brown related that he had no difficulty with appellant and that he (Brown) "just kept laughing and trying to be jolly."

Maxey v. State

58 Tex. Crim. 118 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 26, 1910

On cross-examination of this witness the State was permitted, over appellant’s objection, to prove that he, a few days after this occurrence, had a conversation with one Brown, another negro, in which he told Brown that in … We are of opinion that this comes directly within the rule laid down by this court in Pratt v. State, 53 Texas Crim. Rep., 281 , wherein Judge Ramsey, in a well considered opinion, reviewed this character of question.

Goff v. State

931 S.W.2d 537 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 22, 1996

Although Payne v. … Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303 , 25 L.Ed. 664 (1880). *558 See also, Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 4883 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954); and, Loving v.

Walker v. State

146 Tex. Crim. 138 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 19, 1943

Snow v. State, 114 S. W. (2d) 898 . It may not be done by an accused upon the trial of his case. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. … The contention is here made that there is but one transaction; that the Liquor Control Board was doing the purchasing; and that, under the authority of Plunk v. State, 96 T. C. R. 205, 256 S. W. 922 and Colter 94 T. C.

Cantu v. State

546 S.W.2d 621 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Feb 16, 1977

The baggie was then mailed to Dallas where the remaining traces of brown powder were tested positive for heroin. The net weight of the drug ingredient, heroin, in the remaining powder was a trace. … Cervalles v. State, 513 S.W.2d 865 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Milligan v. State, 478 S.W.2d 552 (Tex.Cr.App.1972). In Reyes v.

Butcher, Charles E. Ii

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jan 28, 2015

(same); Rodriguez v. State, 766 S.W.2d 360, 361 (Tex. App.–Texarkana 1989, pet. ref’d.) (same); Williams v. State, 718 S.W.2d 772, 774 (Tex. App. … Brown v. State, 98 S.W.3d 180, 185 (Tex. Crim.