Case law

First State Bank of Grapeland v. Brown

490 S.W.2d 248 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 4, 1973

Seaman v. Seaman, *250 425 S.W.2d 339 (Tex.Sup., 1968); Bishop v. Bishop, 359 S.W.2d 869 (Tex.Sup., 1962); Esquivo v. Feuhs, 459 S.W.2d 490 (Tex.Civ.App., Houston 14th, 1970, n. w. h.). … In Esquivo v.

Texas Liquor Control Board v. Blacher

115 S.W.2d 1030 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 7, 1938

Texas Liquor Control Board v. Warfield, Tex.Civ.App., 110 S.W.2d 646 . … The holding of the Austin court in Bradley v. Texas Liquor Control Board, supra, was followed by the Waco Court of Civil Appeals in Texas .Liquor Control Board v.

Insurance Company of North America v. Brown

385 S.W.2d 489 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 8, 1964

Brown, Jr., a minor, by and through his father, Charles D. … In Texas Employers’ Insurance Association v.

Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. Brown

205 S.W. 378 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 26, 1918

Brown, recovered of appellant, the Ft. … Co. v. Griggs, 106 S. W. 411 ; 4 R. C. L. 1033.

Texas Liquor Control Board v. Lanza

129 S.W.2d 1153 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 20, 1939

In Texas Liquor Control Board v. … Texas Liquor Control Board v. Floyd, Tex.Civ.App., 117 S.W.2d 530, 537 .

Zucht v. San Antonio School Board

170 S.W. 840 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 21, 1914

If much must be left to the discretion of the board, certainly the undisputed facts in this case and the finding of the jury in response to the second issue show that the board has not abused its discretion. McSween v. … Board of School Trustees, 129 S. W. 206 ; note to case of People v. Board of Education, 17 L. R. A. (N. S.) 709. [5] 3.

Brown v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

449 S.W.2d 93 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 12, 1969

Central Surety & Insurance Corp. v. Anderson, 446 S.W.2d 897 (Fort Worth Tex.Civ.App., 1969), and National Surety Corporation v. Diggs, 272 S. … In Sheldon v.

Texas Liquor Control Board v. Jones

378 S.W.2d 898 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 1, 1964

We quote further from our opinion in the Roberts case: “In Wolf v. … Respondents cite our opinion in Victory Truck Line, Inc. v.

Twin City Fire Insurance Co. v. Brown

602 S.W.2d 118 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 30, 1980

Respondent Brown originally brought this suit as an appeal of the award of the Industrial Accident Board. … School Dist. v. Aldridge, Tex., 400 S.W.2d 893 ; Vance v. Wilson, Tex., 382 S.W.2d 107 ; Gamble v. Banneyer, Tex., 151 S.W.2d 586 .

Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Brown

181 S.W. 238 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 24, 1915

As said by Justice Neill for this court in Bonn v. Railway, 82 S.

Morse v. Board of Medical Examiners

57 Tex. Civ. App. 93 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 13, 1909

Board of Medical Supervisors, 33 Washington Law Rep., 470; Matthews v. Murphy, 54 L. R. A., 415, 63 S. W., 785 ; Hewett v. Board of Medical Examiners, 148 Cal., 590 , 84 Pac., 39 ; School of Magnetic Healing v. … (State v. State Medical Examining Board, 32 Minn., 324 , 50 Am. Rep., 575 .) We have reached the conclusion that the statute is not subject'to the objection urged against it.

Texas Liquor Control Board v. Saiz

220 S.W.2d 502 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 9, 1949

Bradley v. Texas Liquor Control Board, Tex.Civ.App., 108 S.W.2d 300 ; Texas Liquor Control Board v. Jones, Tex.Civ.App., 112 S.W.2d 227 ; Scales v. … Texas Liquor Control Board, Tex.Civ.App., 192 S.W.2d 466 ; Texas Liquor Control Board v. Lanza, Tex.Civ.App., 129 S.W.2d 1153 , Wlr. Dis. Judg. Cor. In the case of State v.

State Board of Insurance v. Williams

736 S.W.2d 259 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 9, 1987

Jim Mattox, Attorney General v. The State Board of Insurance. Jim Mattox, Attorney General is the real party in interest in the instant proceeding. … The order about which the Board complains is an interlocutory order which is not ordinarily appealable until merged into a final judgment. North East I.S.D. v.

Texas Liquor Control Board v. Warfield

110 S.W.2d 646 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 2, 1937

Bradley v. Texas Liquor Control Board (Tex.Civ.App.) 108 S.W.2d 300 ; Shupee v. Railroad Commission, 123 Tex. 521 , 73 S.W.2d 505 ; Brown v. Humble Oil & Ref. … Brown v. Humble Oil & Ref. Co., 126 Tex. 296 , 83 S.W.2d 935 , 87 S.W.2d 1069 , 99 A.L.R. 1107 , 101 A.L.R. 1393 ; McCall v. Lewis (Tex.Civ.App.) 263 S.W. 325 ; City of Dallas v. Rutledge (Tex.Civ.App.) 258 S.W. 534 .

Industrial Accident Board v. O'DOWD

298 S.W.2d 657 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 30, 1957

Appellees cite the case of Francisco v. Board of Dental Examiners, 149 S.W.2d 619 , er ref. by this Court. … In Coe v.

Weyel v. Board of Firemen

345 S.W.2d 456 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 24, 1961

The Board is a group of statutory trustees charged with the duty of managing said pension funds. Bolen v. … Our Supreme Court in the recent case of City of San Antonio et al. v.

Board of Prison Com'rs v. Binford

259 S.W. 169 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 17, 1924

board, that the board of prison commissioners in its official capacity as such board claims the following described personal property, to wit: [Here follows a list and description of the property.] … State v. Kroner, 2 Tex. 492 ; State v, Snyder, 66 Tex. 700 , 18 S. W. 106 .

Houston & Texas Central Railway Co. v. Brown

33 Tex. Civ. App. 237 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 14, 1903

Railway v. Gilbert, 4 Texas Civ. App., 366; Wells-Fargo v. Battle, 5 Texas Civ. App., 534; Railway v. Pickens, 58 S. W. Rep., 157 ; 5 Am. and Eng. Enc. of Law, 2 ed., 395, and notes.

Terry County Airport Board v. Clark

378 S.W.2d 932 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 11, 1964

Bank v. Barrett, Tex.Civ.App., 25 S.W. 456 ; Stribling v. Moore, 33 Tex.Civ.App. 297 , 76 S.W. 593 ; St. Louis Southwestern R. Co. of Texas v. … Marr-Piper Co. v. Bullis, Tex.Com.App., 1 S.W.2d 572 ; Kuhl-mann’s Estate v. Poss, Tex.Civ.App., 220 S.W. 564 ; Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v.

Brown-McKee, Inc. v. J. F. Bryan & Associates

522 S.W.2d 958 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 6, 1975

McKanna v. Edgar, 388 S.W.2d 927 (Tex.1965); Flynt v. City of Kingsville, 125 Tex. 510 , 82 S.W.2d 934 (1935, opinion adopted). … McKanna v. Edgar, supra. Within the limitations indicated a return should receive a fair, reasonable and natural construction, and effect given to its plain intent and meaning.