Case law

Brown & Root U.S.A., Inc. v. Moore

731 S.W.2d 137 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 21, 1987

Giffin v. Smith, 688 S.W.2d 112, 114 (Tex.1985). … West v. Solito, 563 S.W.2d 240, 243 (Tex.1978).

Austin Fire Ins. Co. v. Brown

160 S.W. 973 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 8, 1913

Brown, in the county court of Cottle county, Tex., against the Austin Pire Insurance Company, in which C. L. … Campbell v. American Fire Insurance Co., 73 Wis. 100 , 40 N. W. 661 .

Oncor Electric Delivery Co. v. Brown

451 S.W.3d 128 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 6, 2014

City of Austin v. Capitol Livestock Auction Co., 453 S.W.2d 461, 463 (Tex.1970). As stated in Gossett v. State, 417 S.W.2d 730, 734 (Tex.Civ.App. … The Brown Trust contends that we should not follow the Gossett case because it is too old and does not properly reflect the current state of the law. 2 Instead, the Brown Trust ask us to follow Sw. Elec. Power Co. v.

Austin Fire Ins. Co. v. Brown

147 S.W. 680 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 13, 1912

Defendant in error, Brown, filed suit in the county court of Cottle county against plaintiff in error, declaring upon a verbal contract of insurance and for damages for breach of said contract. … Adams v. Haircloth, 97 S. W. 507 . Reversed and remanded.

Law, Snakard, Brown & Gambill v. Brunette

509 S.W.2d 671 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 9, 1974

Cowan endorsed both notes to plaintiff corporation — Law, Snakard, Brown & Gambill (appellant) — in consideration for legal fees. … Roquemore v.

Howard v. French-Brown Floors Co.

542 S.W.2d 709 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 7, 1976

Seaman v. Seaman, 425 S.W.2d 339, 341 (Tex.1968); and City of Abilene v. Meek, 311 S.W.2d 654, 656 (Tex. Civ.App.-Eastland 1958, writ ref’d). … New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Texas Industries, Inc., 414 S.W.2d 914 (Tex.1967). He argues that Tenneco Oil Co. v.

United General Insurance Exchange v. Brown

628 S.W.2d 505 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 4, 1982

Co. v. Peralez, 546 S.W.2d 88, 97 (Tex.Civ.App.—Corpus Christi 1976, writ ref’d n.r.e.); Traders & General Insurance Company v. Randolph, 467 S.W.2d 689, 690 (Tex.Civ.App. … Ass’n v. Flores, 564 S.W.2d 831 (Tex.Civ.App.—Forth Worth 1978, writ ref’d n.r.e.), and Texas Emp. Ins. Ass’n v. Miller, 596 S.W.2d 621 (Tex.Civ.App.—Waco 1980, no writ).

City of La Grange v. Brown

161 S.W. 8 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 29, 1913

In Reilly v. City of Racine, 51 Wis. 526 , 8 N. … In fact, the Connecticut case, and Deniston v. Clark, 125 Mass. 216 , are the only cases which we have found which are directly in point.

Cantrell v. Markham & Brown Company & Associates

452 S.W.2d 940 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 20, 1970

Likewise, in Wood v. … Ellis v. Moore, supra.

Brown v. Singer Sewing MacHine Company

352 S.W.2d 306 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 15, 1961

Brown. Singer obtained possession of the new machine through sequestration proceedings. … Brown, was the only original defendant, however Mrs. Brown was made a party by supplemental pleadings. Mr. Brown answered by alleging the mental incapacity of Mrs.

Brown Oil Tools, Inc. v. Broughton

353 S.W.2d 505 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 25, 1962

Diebold Safe & Lock Co. v. Shelton, 192 S.W. 340 (Tex.Civ.App.); Culp v. Browne,. 235 S.W. 675 (Tex.Civ.App.). Appellant attaches great importance to the following testimony of appellee: “Q. … In Gulf Paving Co. v.

Brown v. Getty Reserve Oil, Inc.

626 S.W.2d 810 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 17, 1981

As stated in Brown v. … In Mathews v.

Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Whitaker

4 Tex. Civ. App. 380 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 11, 1893

Hall v. Hall, 52 Texas, 294 ; Martin Brown Co. v. Perrill, 77 Texas, 204 . … This has been expressly decided in the case of Cabell v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company, 81 Texas, 104 .

Gray v. State Ex Rel. Brown

406 S.W.2d 934 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Aug 5, 1966

Butchofsky v. Crawford et al., 269 S.W.2d 536 (El Paso Civ.App., 1954, no writ history). … Section (h) of Art. 14.08 and Art. 14.09 have not undergone amendment since the date of the opinion in State v. Crawford, supra. Principles of legal construction applicable to the situation in State v.

Houston Pipe Line Company v. Brown

361 S.W.2d 884 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 25, 1962

Ap-pellee, V. T. Norton, owner of an undivided ¼⅛ interest in said tract, intervened and in effect adopted the pleading of appellee Brown. … See also Leonard v. Small, Tex.Civ.App.1930, 28 S.W.2d 826 , writ ref.; Board of Regents of State Teachers College v. Kelley, Tex.Civ.App.1948, 208 S.W.2d 565 .

Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Lyons

6 Tex. Civ. App. 633 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 21, 1894

The appellee Lyons, a merchant of Waco, Texas, purchased of the Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company, the appellant, wholesale dealers in St. Louis, a bill of goods amounting in value to $1035.65. … Appellant contends that the goods were sold to Lyons upon the faith and credit of the following statement showing his financial condition: “Statement made this 6th of August, 1891, to Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company, St.

Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Brown

617 S.W.2d 271 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 15, 1980

Commerce Trust Co. v. Best, 124 Tex. 583 , 80 S.W.2d 942, at 946 (Comm’n App.1935, opinion adopted); Hight v. Jim Bass Ford, Inc., 552 S.W.2d 490, at 491 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1977, writ ref’d n. r. e.). … Smart v. Tower Land and Investment Company, 597 S.W.2d 333 (1980); Walker v. Temple Trust Co., 124 Tex. 575 , 80 S.W.2d 935 (1935); Spanish Village, Ltd. v. American Mortgage Company, 586 S.W.2d 195, at 200 (Tex.Civ.App.

Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Mayo

8 Tex. Civ. App. 164 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 26, 1894

Donoho v. Fish Bros. & Co., 58 Texas, 166 ; Still v. Focke & Wilkens, 66 Texas, 722 ; Coffin v. Douglass, 61 Texas, 407 ; Focke et al. v. Blum, 82 Texas, 440 . … Fant v. Elsbury, 68 Texas, 3 ; Boyd v. Haynie, 83 Texas, 9 ; Foreman v. Burnette, 83 Texas, 402 . Reversed and remanded.

Wichita Valley Ry. Co. v. Brown

274 S.W. 305 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 1, 1925

Brown against the Wichita Valley Railway Company, and the Ft. Worth & Denver City Railway Company, to recover damages to a shipment of cattle. … Co. v. Gatewood (Tex. Civ. App.) 185 S. W. 932 ; Harle v. Fort Worth & D. C. R. Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 240 S. W. 1004 ; Hines v. Edwards (Tex. Civ. App.) 228 S. W. 1117 ; H. & T. C. R. Co. v.

Brown Electric Contractors, Inc. v. Kelly

595 S.W.2d 610 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 20, 1980

Juarez v. Dunn, 567 S.W.2d 223 (Tex.Civ.App.1978, writ ref’d n. r. e.); Coffee v. Coffee, 589 S.W.2d 507 (Tex.Civ.App.1979, no writ). … Juarez v. Dunn, supra.