Case law

Brown v. Farquhar

225 S.W. 541 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 20, 1920

In Pierce v. … It is true that the matters now relied upon by Brown for relief in the present case were set up in his answer in Rector v. Brown as defenses to the suit.

Brown v. Winn

176 S.W.2d 595 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 12, 1943

The Supreme Court has made a distinction in law on the facts of that case and the facts in other adjudicated cases similar to those here: Phelan v. Schneider, Tex.Civ.App., 146 S.W.2d 244 (writ refused); Miller v. … That is also the holding in Miller v. Rhodius, supra.

Brown v. State

704 S.W.2d 502 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 20, 1986

The jury found that Brown knowingly and intentionally caused the death of the deceased. Intent and knowledge can be inferred from the acts, words, and conduct of the accused. Dues v. … Phillips v. State, 216 S.W.2d 213, 214 (Tex.Crim.App.1949). See Sowell v. State, 503 S.W.2d 793, 795 (Tex.Crim.App.1974). There is no evidence to support an inference other than the guilt of Brown. See Denby v.

Brown v. Robey

27 S.W.2d 590 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 16, 1930

Suffice it here to state that appellant, Leman Brown, as substitute plaintiff for R. E. L.

Briley v. Brown

521 S.W.2d 357 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 13, 1975

Chapman v. Brown

258 S.W. 205 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 24, 1924

In a trial before the court a judgment was rendered in favor of Brown, and Chapman has appealed. … Brown’s title originated, in a deed from Blalock dated January 17, 1913, which was filed for record in the following September.

Brown v. Shamburger

104 S.W.2d 112 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 8, 1937

R.S. art. 4195; Ridling v. Murphy (Tex.Com.App.) 228 S.W. 165 . The orders of the court show that Brown was given legal authority to make the sale, for cash, and the sale was thereafter duly confirmed. … purchasers of property sold under orders of the probate court are protected as innocent purchasers where they have no knowledge of any fraud and the probate proceedings through which they acquired title are regular, Barnes v.

Mills v. Brown

38 Tex. Civ. App. 258 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 8, 1905

Brown v. Oakes

16 Tex. Civ. App. 39 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 8, 1897

At the election the two incumbents were candidates for re-election, hut were defeated, and appellants Brown and Sutton were elected in their stead. … They shall immediately thereafter organize, by electing one of their number president, and one secretary of the board of trustees.

Brown v. State

13 Tex. Ct. App. 347 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 20, 1883

In Williams v. The State, 12 Texas Ct.

Brown v. State

5 Tex. Ct. App. 126 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 1, 1878

At the July term, 1878, of the District Court of Busk County, James Brown, the appellant, was tried and convicted for an assault with intent to murder, with two years in the penitentiary assessed for his punishment. … See Gresham v. The State, 1 Texas Ct. App. 458 ; Young v. The State, 3 Texas Ct. App. 384. Between the Young case and the one at bar there is a striking similarity in the facts.

McElya v. Brown

440 S.W.2d 863 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 18, 1969

Brown obtained a judgment against O. R. McElya. Subsequently, McElya filed suit against Brown in the nature of a Bill of Review.

Brown v. State

28 Tex. Ct. App. 297 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 30, 1889

Brown executed said bond with sureties, conditioned as the law requires, was discharged from custody, and the bond returned to the District Court. This bond was forfeited and judgment nisi rendered upon it. … Again, the allegation that Brown had executed said bond in order “to-answer the State of Texas v,pon a charge by information before W. L. Harding, J.

Brown v. Ferrell

144 S.W. 687 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 21, 1912

Fannie Ferrell, and appellant, Kate Brown, and in the plea of non est factum the said Miss Kate Ferrell has sworn to all matters therein set out.” … Eborn v. Zimpelman, 47 Tex. 525 , 26 Am. Rep. 315 . The evidence is amply sufficient to sustain the finding of the court that the receipts were forgeries.

Brown v. State

3 Tex. Ct. App. 401 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 1, 1878

Brown v. State

6 Tex. Ct. App. 188 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 1, 1879

At the March term, 1875, of the District Court of Cooke County, an indictment was filed therein against one Putnam Brown; and on the 18th of October, 1875, he was arrested, and entered into bond for his appearance at the

Brown v. Farwell

285 S.W. 688 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 22, 1926

Cunningham v. San Saba County, 1 Tex. Civ. App. 480 , 20 S. W. 941 ; Evans v. Scott, 37 Tex. Civ. App. 373 , 83 S. W. 874 ; Nave v. City of Clarendon (Tex. Civ. App.) 216 S. W. 1110 ; Hall v. City of Austin, 20 Tex. … Co. v. Baudat, 21 Tex. Civ. App. 236 , 51 S. W. 543 .

Franks v. Brown

43 S.W.2d 613 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 28, 1931

Brown, appellee, restraining Nannie B. Franks and husband, H. G. … Brown, to enter the home of the-said V. A. Brown and as result of such false and slanderous statements the said V. A.

Allen v. Brown

147 S.W. 1165 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 30, 1912

Brown for the sum of $2,000, with interest and costs of suit, with judgment over in appellee Brown’s favor against Allen and Cozart for all such sums as Brown might be required to pay in satisfaction of the judgment. … Brown pay the unjust judgment rendered against him in the King case.’ ” The evident effect of the judgment in favor of King against Allen, Cozart, and Brown was, as between the defendants, to make Brown secondarily liable

McDonald v. Brown

36 S.W.2d 774 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 25, 1931

Brown, sheriff of Cameron county, and H. D. Seago, county clerk, from levying and issuing a writ of execution in a case styled C. W. Garner v. … There is evidence that sustains the recitals in the judgment that the parties were properly served in the case of Garner v. Rio Hondo Co-operative Society.