Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.06s
285 S.W.2d 752 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 7, 1955
Brown and,B..A.-Lay, employed appellee Troy Howard to spray certain Brahman cattle owned ..by them. For this purpose Howard used a gallon of “Green Light” concentrate manufactured by the appellee W. J. Klauss. … Baylor v. Eastern Seed Co., Tex. Civ.App., 191 S.W.2d 689 .
Cited 24 timesPublished804 S.W.2d 566 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 15, 1991
Gilbertson v. … Livingston v. State, 739 S.W.2d at 338 . If the prosecutor’s complained-of argument was error, such error was harmless. Montoya v. State, 744 S.W.2d at 40.; Zeller v. State, 728 S.W.2d 107, 109 (Tex.App.
Cited 35 timesPublished623 S.W.2d 682 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 25, 1981
Hamilton v. … Goffney v. Lowry, 554 S.W.2d 157 (Tex.1977). In Goffney the Supreme Court stated: The starting point in this matter is the inquiry set forth in Pinchback v.
Cited 14 timesPublished571 S.W.3d 324 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 20, 2018
It stated: Over one month ago, I wrote to you concerning your prior representation of my clients-Ernal Lee Brown Jr. (a.k.a. Ernal Lee Lewis Jr.), Mary Ola Brown (a.k.a. … Shell Oil Co. v. Ross , 356 S.W.3d 924 , 929-30 (Tex. 2011). HECI Expl. , 982 S.W.2d at 886 . Wagner & Brown, Ltd. v. Horwood , 58 S.W.3d 732 , 735 (Tex. 2001) (citing S.V. , 933 S.W.2d at 7 ).
Cited 6 timesPublished11 Tex. Civ. App. 526 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 6, 1895
It was held in Colorado County v. Delaney, 54 Texas, 280 , that by the amount of the judgment was meant the amount recovered exclusive of costs. In Owens v. Levy, 1 W. & W. C. … C., sec. 409, the Court of Appeals expressed a different opinion, holding that the construction given the statute in Colorado Co. v.
Cited 2 timesPublished580 S.W.2d 425 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 4, 1979
Holley v. Adams, supra. … Although Holley v.
Cited 11 timesPublished713 S.W.2d 725 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 26, 1986
Cathy Brown (Brown) suspected that she might be pregnant. A visit to the county nurse confirmed her suspicions. Brown then consulted Dr. Armstrong. She was seen by Dr. Armstrong on three different occasions. … Co. v.
Cited 30 timesPublished29 Tex. Civ. App. 389 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 21, 1902
Brown, of Houston, Texas (hereinafter called principal), and the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, a corporation created and existing under the laws of the State of Maryland, having its principal office in the city … Brown, [Seal] [Seal] [Seal] [Seal] “Principals. “Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, “By Norman G. Kittrell, Director. “Attest: ander G. Bobb, General Agent.”
Cited 20 timesPublished143 S.W.2d 223 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 9, 1940
Norman, now' deceased, who was acting for the Browns, advised Mr. Hewitt by letter that the Browns were preparing to pay off their loan and requested Mr. Hewitt to furnish him the correct balance owing Mr, Hewitt. Mr. … McCray v. Kelly, Tex.Civ.App., 130 S.W.2d 458 ; Crawford v. Texas Imp. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 196 S.W. 195 .
Cited 28 timesPublished872 S.W.2d 312 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 16, 1994
Tex.R.Civ.P. 67, 90; see Roark v. … The court in Murray v.
Disapproved on other grounds by Roberts v. Williamson, 46 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 944 (2003)Cited 80 timesPublished290 S.W.3d 247 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 16, 2009
To support his contention that the trial court erred by refusing to submit the requested charge, Brown relies on Torres v. … Second, the evidence demonstrates that Brown’s acts were voluntary. For example, Brown testified that he mistakenly took Ambien; however, he did so of his own volition. See Hanks v.
Cited 25 timesPublished154 S.W. 322 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 18, 1912
Nickerson & Matson v. Nickerson, 65 Tex. 281 . … Brown, the injured party, had no cause of action at the time of her death, nor at any other time. Nor is it material that Mrs. Brown was free from fault.
Cited 29 timesPublished10 Tex. Civ. App. 64 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 14, 1895
Brown was then employed to teach the school, and when the petition was filed was so engaged, and was receiving pay therefor out of said fund. … Andrews & Co. v. Curtis, 2 Texas Civ. App., 678; Clark v. School District, 78 Ill., 474 ; 1 Dill. Mun. Corp., secs. 22, 24, and notes 2, 25.
Cited 6 timesPublished248 S.W.2d 1019 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 7, 1952
Phoenix Refining Co. v. Tips, 125 Tex. 69 , 81 S.W.2d 60, 62 . In Hawkins v. … Brown, at the time he executed the will was -acting ■under the undue influence of J. T. Brown, and the burden was on them to‘ prove it. Long v. Long, 133 Tex. 96 , 125 S.W.2d 1034 ; Burkett v.
Cited 1 timesPublished41 Tex. Civ. App. 588 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 10, 1906
Brown, as sheriff of Clay County, and against W. H. … Greenwood, 28 Texas, 680 ; Thomas v. Browder, 33 Texas, 784 ; Heidenheimer v. Brent, 59 Texas, 533 ; Holliman v. Carroll’s Admrs., 27 Texas, 23 ; Morris v. Kasling, 79 Texas, 148 ; Cortez v. State (Texas Cr.
Cited 5 timesPublished536 S.W.2d 80 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 26, 1976
Transport, Inc. v. Campbell, 406 S.W.2d 191 (Tex.Sup., 1966); T.R.C.P. 290, “(Verdict) — Definition and Substance”. … Co. v.
Cited 33 timesPublished96 S.W.2d 839 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 29, 1936
Gale et al. v. Board of Sup’rs of Oakland County, 260 Mich. 399 , 245 N.W. 363 . … Turner v. Allen, supra.
Cited 20 timesPublished225 S.W. 780 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 6, 1920
V. Brown, joined by her husband, M. V. Brown, brought this suit against the appellants, Mrs. J. H. Hill and her husband, J. H. Hill, alleging, in substance, that the appellee Mrs. M. V. … V. Brown, in which Mrs. Brown verbally agreed that she, Mrs.
Cited 16 timesPublished22 S.W.2d 757 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 6, 1929
Hill v. Kimball, 76 Tex. 210 , 13 S. W. 59 , 7 L. R. A. 618; Ricker v. Shoemaker, 81 Tex. 22 , 16 S. W. 645 ; Austin v. Cameron, above; Vaught v. Jones (Tex. Com. App.) 17 S.W.(2d) 779 . … The case of Rigby v. Gaines (Tex. Oiv.
Cited 18 timesPublished167 S.W. 764 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 13, 1914
Brown, seeking to recover a balance of $74.90, alleged to be owing upon a contract for the construction of a building. The defendant filed a plea in reconvention for more than $100. … See Bryant v. Moore, this day decided by this court, and the authorities therein referred to. Linn v. Arambould, 55 Tex. 611 .
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna