Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstexapp

10,000+ results

1.47s

  • P. L. Buvens v. E. R. Brown

    22 S.W.2d 1119 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 12, 1929

    The appellee, Brown, was the plaintiff below, and appellants were defendants.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bell v. Board of Directors of Pythian Widows & Orphans Home

    219 S.W.2d 93 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 3, 1949

    McMurray v. Stanley, 69 Tex. 227 , 6 S.W. 412, 413 . See also Norton v. Smith, Tex.Civ.App., 227 S.W. 542 ; Darragh v. Barmore, Tex.Com.App., 242 S.W. 714 ; Arrington v. … McHatton’s Estate v. Peak’s Estate, Tex.Civ.App., 248 S.W. 103, 105 , points 4 and 5 (writ ref.), citing: Patten v. Herring, 9 Tex.Civ.App., 640 , 29 S.W. 388 ; Lane v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State Board of Registration for Professional Engineers v. Hatter

    139 S.W.2d 169 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 4, 1940

    In the case of Herring v. Houston National Exchange Bank, 113 Tex. 264 , 253 S. … In the case of Board of Water Engineers v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Allen v. Hutcheson

    57 Tex. Civ. App. 71 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 13, 1909

    Brown of the land so purchased, Allen having bought the land subsequent to May 7, 1904, for a much less price than it was sold to the Tobin Oil Company and afterwards made Brown a deed to it. … Brown $2,500 for the use of Brown, Lovejoy and Allen on a purchase of land, was illegal and void, for the reason that the directors voting said amounts were personally interested therein; and you are further instructed that

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Blakemore v. Board of Trustees of Public Free Schools

    262 S.W. 843 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 26, 1924

    Conklin, and Robert McGregor, hereafter called contestants, who alleged that they are resident citizens and qualified voters in the city of Galveston, against the board of trustees of the public free schools of Galveston, … W. 621 ; Davis v. Hubbard (Tex. Civ. App.) 233 S.W. 876 ; Bassel v. Shanklin (Tex. Civ. App.) 183 S. W. 105 ; Tharp v. Blake (Tex. Civ. App.) 171 S. W. 549 ; Cole v. State (Tex. Civ. App.) 163 S. W. 353 ; R.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Marvin Brown, Inc. v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. of Texas

    256 S.W.2d 135 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 12, 1953

    The waybill covering each shipment showed that Ideal Cement Company (which during some of the earlier shipments had a different name) was the consignor, and that Marvin Brown, Inc. was the consignee.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • R. Fred Brown v. Owen M. Murray

    67 S.W.2d 389 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 2, 1933

    Kirk, Appellant, v. Owen M.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Power v. Andrews

    253 S.W. 870 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 2, 1923

    In Brown v. Bank (Tex. Civ. App.) 175 S. … This suit is not a collateral attack, but is a direct attack upon the action of the board. Brown v. Bank (Tex. Oiv. App.) 175 S. W, 1122.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Brown

    46 Tex. Civ. App. 10 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 3, 1907

    Co. v. Matthews, 100 Texas, 63 , and International & G. N. Ry. Co. v. Ploeger, 16 Texas Ct. … Co. v. Smith, 87 Texas, 353 . *12 Appellant’s fifth assignment of error is overruled for reasons already stated.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Robinson Springs School Dist. Board of Trustees v. McCorkel

    101 S.W.2d 876 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 5, 1937

    The amendment. of 1935 added the following: “Provided that any district or independent district being dissatisfied with any transfer made by the county superintendent may appeal from such action to the county board of trustees

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Firemen & Policemen's Pension Fund, Board of Trustees v. Cruz

    458 S.W.2d 700 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 1, 1970

    See Sec. 7, supra; Weyel v. Board of Firemen, Policemen, etc., 345 S.W.2d 456 (Tex.Civ.App.—Eastland 1961, writ ref’d n. r. e.) ; Collins v. Board of Firemen, Policemen, etc., 319 S.W.2d 174 (Tex.Civ.App. … In Board of Trustees of Policemen’s Pension Fund of City of Pueblo v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Board of Firemen's Relief & Retirement Fund Trustees v. Parks

    424 S.W.2d 59 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 18, 1967

    However, no lump sum payment shall be made without prior approval by majority vote of the Board of Trustees. The adoption of a program to make lump? … No lump sum payment could be recovered without a prior approval by the majority vote of the Board of Trustees and that has not been done in this case.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • County Board of School Trustees v. Detrixhe

    469 S.W.2d 741 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 6, 1971

    Appellees rely upon the language in London Independent School District v. Thomerson, 223 S.W.2d 314 (Tex.Civ.App. … We are inclined to approve and follow the rule as set out in Mount Enterprise Independent School District v. Colley, 424 S.W.2d 650 (Tex.Civ.App.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chimney Rock National Bank of Houston v. State Banking Board

    376 S.W.2d 595 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 4, 1964

    In Moran v. … Dybdal v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Hagood v. City of Houston Zoning Board of Adjustment

    982 S.W.2d 17 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 5, 1998

    Should the district court not issue the writ, then the appellants would have the burden of providing a sufficient record at the hearing to determine the illegality of the Board’s decision. Cf. Barry Nussbaum v. … See, e.g., Schlipf v. Exxon Corp., 644 S.W.2d 453, 454 (Tex.1982); Central Nat’l Ins. Co. of Omaha v. Glover, 856 S.W.2d 490, 492 (Tex.App.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • City Public Service Board of San Antonio v. Karp

    585 S.W.2d 838 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 11, 1979

    In its conclusions of law the trial court, relying on Dwyer v. Houston Pipe Line Company, 374 S.W.2d 662 (Tex.1964) and Pioneer Natural Gas Company v. … Peterson v. Barron, 401 S.W.2d 680 (Tex.Civ.App.- — Dallas 1966, no writ). Peterson v. Barron also involved an easement that is general in its purpose, but specifically defined in its location.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Peppermint Lounge v. Texas Liquor Control Board

    411 S.W.2d 745 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 30, 1967

    In Hallum v. Texas Liquor Control Board, 166 S.W.2d 175 (Tex.Civ.App. … To the same effect is Stubbs v. Texas Liquor Control Board, 166 S.W.2d 178 (Tex.Civ.App.-Dallas, 1942, writ ref’d w. o. m.) ; Mayhew v. Power, 104 S.W.2d 642 (Tex.Civ.App.-Fort Worth, 1937) ; and Bacon v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Benson v. Travelers' Ins. Co.

    40 S.W.2d 966 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 29, 1931

    Meadows & Co. v. Turner (Tex. Civ. App.) 270 S. W. 899 ; Vilbig Motor Freight Lines v. Jenness (Tex. Civ. App.) 84 S.W.(2d) 684 . … The approval by said board of his settlement, which was not proven, does not amount to an award. Lumbermen’s Reciprocal Ass’n v. Henderson (Tex. Com. App.) 15 S.W.(2d) 565 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Cummins v. Board of Trustees of Eanes Ind. Sch. Dist.

    468 S.W.2d 913 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 9, 1971

    Board of Insurance Commissioners v. Title Insurance Association of Texas, 153 Tex. 574 , 272 S.W.2d 95 (1954). The same can be said for similar provisions in the contract. … Mission Independent School District v. Diserens, 144 Tex. 107 , 188 S.W.2d 568 (1945); Alvin Independent School District v. Cooper, 404 S.W.2d 76 (Tex.Civ.App. Houston, 1966, no writ).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Fluellen v. County Board of Education of Dallas County

    202 S.W.2d 510 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 12, 1947

    Donna Independent School Dist. v. First State Bank of Donna, Tex.Civ.App., 227 S.W. 974 ; Bevers v. Winfrey, Tex.Civ.App., 260 S.W. 627 ; Maxey v. Noland, Tex.Civ.App., 31 S.W.2d 468 ; State ex rel. Nevills v. … Sanderson, Tex.Civ.App., 88 S.W.2d 1069 ; Johnson v. City of Dallas, Tex.Civ.App., 291 S.W. 972 ; County Trustees of Navarro County v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.