Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.30s
Texas Industrial Accident Board v. Allstate Insurance Co.
570 S.W.2d 201 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Aug 3, 1978
In Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. … Miears v. Industrial Accident Board, 149 Tex. 270 , 232 S.W.2d 671, 672 (1950).
Cited 1 timesPublishedFarmers & Merchants Insurance Co. v. State Board of Insurance
321 S.W.2d 354 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 11, 1959
After notice and hearing the Board entered its order denying the application. … Southern Canal Company v. State Board of Water Engineers, Tex.Civ.App. Austin, 311 S.W.2d 938 , affirmed by the Supreme Court December 3, 1958, 318 S.W.2d 619 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedTEXAS STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY v. Lane
349 S.W.2d 763 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 22, 1961
This appeal is to be distinguished from that upon which this court wrote in Texas State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. Lane, Tex.Civ.App.1960, 337 S.W.2d 801 , error refused. … Texas Practice, Lowe & Archer, Chapter 7 “Injunctions”, part G “Pleading”, Sec. 334 “Certainty and Definiteness”, citing Davenport v. Railroad Commission, Tex.Civ.App., Austin, 1935, 89 S.W.2d 1006 , writ dism.
Cited 5 timesPublished286 S.W. 264 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 28, 1926
However, inasmuch as the question may recur in a later proceeding, it may not be inappropriate to state the view entertained as to the effect of Browning v. Hooper, supra, on the power of the county board of trustees. … Webb v. Board School Trustees, 95 Tex. 131 , 65 S. W. 878 ; Robbins v. Limestone County, 114 Tex. 345 , 268 S. W. 915 ; Hester & Roberts v. Donna In. District (Tex. Civ. App.) 239 S. W. 992 .
Cited 20 timesPublishedHall v. Board of Adjustment of City of McAllen
239 S.W.2d 647 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 2, 1951
In King v. Duke, Tex.Civ.App., 31 S.W. 335 , 336, the Court said: “None of the objections were well taken. … See also: Crabb v. Uvalde Paving Co., Tex.Com.App., 23 S.W.2d 300 ; 26 Texjur. 520, § 662. Appellants further contend that these minutes should have been filed in the office of the city clerk.
Cited 10 timesPublishedWestern Wood Products Co. v. Box
248 S.W.2d 974 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 30, 1952
Isbell v. Kenyon-Warner Dredging Co., 113 Tex. 528 , 261 S.W.762; Buie-Crawford Co. v. Cleburne National Bank, Tex.Civ.App., Ill S.W.2d 830. … . p. 1129, Sec. 286; Texas Employer’s Insurance Associatien v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of Texas · Oct 13, 2015
PM To: Abel Acosta Cc: John Brown Subject: Hill III, PD-0019-15 Abel & John: On behalf of Mr. … Box 868 Cedar Hill, TX 75106 Dallas County Phone: 972-795-2401 Fax: 972-692-6636 michael@mowlalaw.com http://www.mowlalaw.com B BOARD CERTIFIED" Texas Board of Legal Specialization CRIMINAL APPELLATE LAW
Cited 0 timesPublishedAsbury v. Texas State Board of Public Accountancy
719 S.W.2d 680 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 19, 1986
Ergon, Inc. v. Dean, 649 S.W.2d 772, 774 (Tex.App.1983, no writ). The Board concedes that its action was invalid as an informal disposition. … Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation, 318 U.S. 80, 87 , 63 S.Ct. 454, 459 , 87 L.Ed. 626 (1942); Allied Chemical Corporation v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDurish v. TEXAS STATE BOARD OF INS.
817 S.W.2d 764 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 24, 1991
DURISH, as Permanent Receiver of Lloyd's, U.S., a Texas Lloyd's Plan Insurer, Appellant, v. TEXAS STATE BOARD OF INSURANCE; the Attorney General of the State of Texas, Jim Mattox; and the State of Texas, Appellees. … McCain v. Yost, 155 Tex. 174 , 284 S.W.2d 898 (1955); Keith v. State, 760 S.W.2d 746 (Tex.App.Fort Worth 1988, no writ); Cardenas v. State, 683 S.W.2d 128 (Tex. App.
Cited 0 timesPublishedSt. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Hall & Brown Woodworking MacHine Co.
23 Tex. Civ. App. 211 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 21, 1900
. & Brown Woodworking Machine Company, plaintiff below, sued the appellant, St. … I find that on the 29th day of September, 1891, plaintiff, Hall & Brown Woodworking Machine Company, shipped a car load of machinery to be delivered to itself at Bettie, Texas.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCity of Fort Worth v. McDonald
293 S.W.2d 256 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 29, 1956
In Brown Cracker & Candy Co. v. City of Dallas, 1911, 104 Tex. 290 , 137 S.W. 342, 343 , our Supreme Court applied the converse of the rule that controls this case. … State v. Ferguson, 1939, 133 Tex. 60 , 125 S.W.2d 272, 277 . Enforcement of void municipal ordinances has been enjoined often. Brown Cracker & Candy Co. v. City of Dallas, supra; Crossman v.
Cited 22 timesPublished221 S.W.2d 347 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 11, 1949
In support of this view appellants cite the following Texas authorities: Texas Liquor Control Board v. Warfield, Tex. Civ.App., Waco, 110 S.W.2d 646 ; Isbell v. … Brown, Tex.Civ.App., San Antonio, 196 S.W.2d 691 ; Railroad Commission v. Houston Natural Gas Corp., Tex.Civ.App., Austin, 186 S.W.2d 117 , Writ Ref. W.O. M.; Arkansas Fuel Oil Co. v.
Cited 20 timesPublishedBlakemore v. Board of Trustees of Public Free Schools
262 S.W. 843 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 26, 1924
Conklin, and Robert McGregor, hereafter called contestants, who alleged that they are resident citizens and qualified voters in the city of Galveston, against the board of trustees of the public free schools of Galveston, … W. 621 ; Davis v. Hubbard (Tex. Civ. App.) 233 S.W. 876 ; Bassel v. Shanklin (Tex. Civ. App.) 183 S. W. 105 ; Tharp v. Blake (Tex. Civ. App.) 171 S. W. 549 ; Cole v. State (Tex. Civ. App.) 163 S. W. 353 ; R.
Cited 2 timesPublishedTexas Soap Mfg. Co. v. American Automobile Ins. Co.
227 S.W.2d 376 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 16, 1950
See Brown & Root v. Traders & General Ins. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 135 S.W.2d 534 . … See discussion of the “anniversary date” in rate application to Workmen’s Compensation Insurance policies in Brown & Root v. Traders & General Ins. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 135 S.W.2d 534 , at pages 536, 538 and 539.
Cited 7 timesPublishedSt. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. Brown
248 S.W. 97 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 8, 1923
L. § 14, p. 442; 1 Sutherland on Dam. (3d Ed.) § 90, p. 262; Warren v. Stoddart, 105 U. S. 224 , 26 L. Ed. 1117 . That rule obtains in Texas. Ry. Co. v. Anderson, 85 Tex. 88 , 19 S. W. 1025 ; Tel. Co. v. … Co. v. Young, 60 Tex. 201 ).
Cited 0 timesPublishedVineyard v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n
263 S.W.2d 675 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 16, 1953
Brown when it used such statement in' making the settlement, and the evidence here raises the issue as to the correctness of such statement for the jury. Texas State Highway Dept. v. … Co. v. Lynch, Tex.Civ.App., 257 S.W.2d 778 ; Associated Employers Lloyds v. Aiken, Tex.Civ.App., 201 S.W.2d 856 , ref. n. r. e.; Jones v. Traders & Gen. Ins. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 188 S.W.2d 739 ; Duncan v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedBuffalo Insurance Company v. McLendon
402 S.W.2d 559 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 19, 1966
In Powers v. … Tribby v. Wokee, 74 Tex. 142 , 11 S.W. 1089 ; R.S.1925, art. 2021.” The case of Maryland Casualty Company v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedTrustees of Independent School Dist. No. 57 v. Elbon
223 S.W. 1039 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 17, 1920
Sam Brown, Mrs. Kate Staude, and Mrs. C. C. … In Callaghan v. McGown, 90 S.
Cited 4 timesPublishedTarrant Appraisal Review Board v. Martinez Bros. Investments, Inc.
946 S.W.2d 914 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 12, 1997
Unauthorized Practice of Law Comm. v. Jansen, 816 S.W.2d 813, 814 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1991, writ denied); Brophy v. Brophy, 599 S.W.2d 345, 347 (Tex.Civ.App.—Texarkana 1980, no writ). … Nowhere in section 1.111, however, do we find a requirement that such a written designation must be on file before or at the time that a protest is initially filed with the Board. Cf. Gregg County Appraisal Dist. v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedAustin Mill & Grain Co. v. Brown County Water Improvement Dist. No. 1
128 S.W.2d 829 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 26, 1939
McCraw, 125 Tex. 268 , 83 S.W.2d 629, 630 ; Brazos River Conservation & Reclamation Dist. v. McCraw, 126 Tex. 506 , 91 S.W.2d 665 ; Brady v. Hidalgo County Water Imp. Dist., 127 Tex. 123 , 91 S.W.2d 1058 . … In Brady v. Hidalgo County Water Improvement District, supra, the district was a water improvement taxing district.
Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna