Case law

Spring Garden Ins. Co. of Philadelphia v. Brown

143 S.W. 292 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 23, 1911

Brown against the Spring Garden Insurance Company of Philadelphia to recover on a certain fire insurance policy covering a stock of merchandise and other property belonging to plaintiff; said property being destroyed by fire … Hein v. O’Connor, 15 S. W. 414 ; Kent v. Liverpool & London Ins. Co., 26 Ind. 294 , 89 Am. Dec. 463 .

Smith v. Travis County Bail Bond Board

559 S.W.2d 693 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 7, 1977

Porter v. Investors Syndicate, 286 U.S. 461 , 52 S.Ct. 617 , 76 L.Ed. 1226 (1931); Francisco v. Board of Dental Examiners, 149 S.W.2d 619 (Tex.Civ.App.1941, writ ref’d). … Instead, Smith was before the Board, as any other applicant, seeking a license the issuance of which is controlled by the “will and pleasure” of the state. See Bishop v.

Barnhart v. County Board of School Trustees

108 S.W.2d 770 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 9, 1937

petitioned the, county board. … Nevills v.

Bullard v. AUSTIN REAL ESTATE BOARD, INCORPORATED

376 S.W.2d 870 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Mar 18, 1964

Appellants state the general rule governing cases of this type, that usually a court will not enjoin expulsion proceedings pending before a professional association or its expulsory tribunal, citing Brown v. … In Brown v. Harris County Medical Society, cited above, there had been a “midnight trial” of expulsion on the same date the accused doctor received notice of the complaint against him.

Harris County Bail Bond Board v. Burns

790 S.W.2d 862 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 31, 1990

Turner v. Pruitt, 161 Tex. 532 , 342 S.W.2d 422 (Tex.1961). The Board next argues that the mandatory continuance provided by § 30.003(b) does not apply to administrative hearings. … Underwriters. v. Jones, 368 S.W.2d 560 (Tex.1963) wherein the Texas Supreme Court states “The statutory right or privilege of the legisla-tor_” (emphasis ours). See also Collier v.

Zoning Board of Adjustment v. Knapp

618 S.W.2d 137 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 17, 1981

See: Cottle v. Knapper, 571 S.W.2d 59 at 64 (Tex.Civ.App.—Tyler 1978, no writ). … In support of their contention that the failure of the Board to make the required findings nullify the Board’s decision, the Appellees rely upon Thompson v.

Berry v. County Board of School Trustees

42 S.W.2d 121 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 16, 1931

We are inclined to agree with the views expressed in Baker et al. v. State et al., by Associate Justice Smith of the San Antonio Court, reported in 26 S.W.(2d) 324 . … 'Stephens County v. Hefner, 118 Tex. 397 , 16 S.W.(2d) 804 .

Smith v. Tarrant County Bail Bond Board

997 S.W.2d 870 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 29, 1999

P. 33.1; Dreyer v. Greene, 871 S.W.2d 697, 698 (Tex.1993); City of San Antonio v. Schautteet, 706 S.W.2d 103, 104 (Tex.1986). … See also Charles Anthony Smith v. Wise County Bail Bond *874 Board, 995 S.W.2d 881, 888 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1999, no pet. h.).

Tamez v. State Board of Dental Examiners

154 S.W.2d 976 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Sep 18, 1941

We are unable to distinguish the procedure provided for in this law from that governing the Liquor Board. We think the views here expressed find support in Shupee v. … Railroad Commission, 123 Tex. 521 , 73 S.W.2d 505 ; Texas Liquor Control Board v. Jones, Tex.Civ.App., 112 S.W.2d 227 ; and Texas Liquor Control Board v. Floyd, Tex.Civ.App., 117 S.W.2d 530 .

Brown v. First State Bank

199 S.W. 895 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 14, 1917

Sections 60a and 60b, Bankruptcy Act, as amended in 1910; Grant v. National Bank, 97 U. S. 80 , 24 L. Ed. 971 ; Stucky v. Masonic Savings Bank, 108 U. S. 74 , 2 Sup. Ct. 219, 27 L. Ed. 640 ; Walker v. Tenison Bros. … W. 166 ; Couturie v. Crespi, 63 Tex. Civ. App. 613 , 134 S.

Travis County Bail Bond Board v. Smith

531 S.W.2d 236 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Dec 11, 1975

Co. v. State Board of Insurance, 163 Tex. 11 , 350 S.W.2d 839 (1961). In Key Western, the State Board of Insurance affirmed an order of the Commissioner of Insurance disapproving a policy form submitted by Key Western. … State Board of Water Engineers, 159 Tex. 227 , 318 S.W.2d 619 . The appellee asserts there is no conflict, citing State Board of Medical Examiners v. Mann (Tex.Sup., 1967) 413 S.W.2d 382 .

Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas v. Brown

147 S.W. 1177 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 13, 1912

Co. v. De Ham, 93 Tex. 74 , 53 S. … Chisum v. Chesnutt, 36 S. W. 758 ; Lumsden et al. v. C., R. I. & T. Ry. Co., 28 Tex. Civ. App. 225 , 67 S. W. 168 : *1180 Redmond v. Sherman Cotton Mills, 100 S.

County Board of School Trustees v. Gray

142 S.W.2d 697 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 21, 1940

Barnhart v. County Board of School Trustees, Tex.Civ.App., 108 S.W.2d 770, 771 , No election was required. … The consent of the trustees of both districts was sufficient to authorize the annexation by order of the County Board of School Trustees. 37 Tex.Jur. 880; Brockman v. Echols, Tex.Civ.App., 22 S.W.2d 686 ; Countz v.

Missouri Pacific Truck Lines, Inc. v. Brown Express, Inc.

399 S.W.2d 430 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 21, 1966

Brown Express, Inc., and other motor common carriers operating under the jurisdiction of the Railroad Commission of Texas by virtue of Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity issued by said Commission brought suit … Sunset Express v. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co., 154 S.W.2d 860 (Fort Worth Civ. App., 1941, writ ref. w. o. m.); Alamo Express, Inc. v. Brown Express, 234 S.W.2d 62 (El Paso Civ.App., 1950, writ ref. n. r. e.).

Brown v. Wm. Cameron & Co.

164 S.W. 425 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Feb 11, 1914

“Nancy Brown et al., Appellants, v. Wm. Cameron & Co. et al., Appellees. … Niday v. Cochran, 48 Tex. Civ. App. 259 , 106 S. W. 462 ; Krisch v. Richter, 125 S. W. 935 ; Ry. Co. v. Martin, 132 S. W. 834 . The verbal agreement with R. O.

Shropshire v. Texas Optometry Board

609 S.W.2d 277 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 6, 1980

In Texas State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. … the Board’s business and proceedings and the Board would not have the power now existing, to adopt rules and regulations for the enforcement of the Act and for the regulation of the practice of optometry.

McCandless v. State

21 Tex. Ct. App. 411 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 2, 1886

(Lumbkin v. The State, 12 Texas Ct. App., 341.) Opinion delivered June 2, 1886. We find no other error in the conviction, but for this error in the charge, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Texas Board of Pardons & Parole v. Graham

878 S.W.2d 684 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jun 22, 1994

When the Board filed its notice of appeal, it superseded the district court’s order of injunction. Ammex Warehouse Co. v. Archer, 381 S.W.2d 478, 485 (Tex.1964); State v. Schless, 815 S.W.2d 373, 375 (Tex.App. … Davis v. Huey, 571 S.W.2d 859, 861-62 (Tex.1978); Omniphone, Inc. v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., 742 S.W.2d 523, 525 (Tex.App.—Austin 1987, no writ).

Baker v. Fort Worth Board of Trade

8 Tex. Civ. App. 560 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 7, 1894

of trade in said city of Fort Worth, which shall be known and designated as Fort Worth Board of Trade. … Land Co. v. Jernegan, 126 Mass., 155 ; Dorris v. Sweeny, 60 N. Y., 463 ; Railway v. Allerton, 18 Wall., 234 .

St. Louis S.W. Ry. Co. of Texas v. Brown

163 S.W. 383 · Court of Appeals of Texas · Jan 24, 1914

Railway Co. v. Hall, 81 S. W. 571 ; Railway Co. v. Burnett, 80 Tex. 536 , 16 S. W. 320 ; Railway Co. v. Cherry, 44 Tex. Civ. App. 344 , 98 S. W. 898 ; Railway Co. v. Henefy, 115 S. W. 57 . … Railway Co. v. Harriett, 80 Tex. 73 , 15 S. W. 556 .