Case law

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1957

Texas-Louisiana Power Co. v. City of Farmersville, ) 2d 235; Tillery v. Town of McLean, I@?A,"ipj 46 S.W 2d 1028; Berry v. County Board of School Trustees (Cif. App.) 42 S.W.2d 129 In Neff v. … (Koy v. SchneSder, 110 Tex. 369, 221 S.W. 880, denying rehearing 218 S.W. 479; State Hon. Raymond W. Vowell, Page 6 (w-252) v. Houston Oil Co. Div. Brown v.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1948

Thus in P ess v. Fer son 163 U.S. 537, the' Supreme Court of t&tzd. … nese citizen of the United States is de- nied equal protection of the laws when he is classed among the colored races and furnished facilities for e'ducationequal to that offered to all, whether white, brown

Opinion No.

Texas Attorney General Reports · Mar 24, 1986

(Texas Highway Commission v. … City of Sherman v. Public Utility Commission of Texas, 643 S.W.2d 681 , 686 (Tex. 1983); Brown v. Humble Oil Refining Co., 83 S.W.2d 935 , 941 (Tex. 1935).

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1987

In Parker v. Brown, 317 ? p. 3356 Mr. John R. … The standards for applying the Parker v. Brown doctrine, as articulated by the federal courts, are as follows: 1.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1965

Blewltt v. Meuargel County Line Ind. Sch. … ” ,.- The court In Blewltt v.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1959

Indu6trialAccident Board v. O'Dowd, Tex., 303 S.W.2d 763. Appellant concedes that no notioe was given to Hamilton. … Brown, Jr. REVIEWEDFORTHEA!l!TORNEX GEZiEBAL BY: W. V. Geppert

Opinion No.

Texas Attorney General Reports · Apr 4, 2007

See Albertson's, Inc. v. Sinclair , 984 S.W.2d 958,961 (Tex. 1999); Tex. … See The Irresistible , 20 U.S. 551 (1822) (ship could not be forfeited under an expired provision of the Neutrality Act of March 3, 1817); Brown v. City of Amarillo , 180 S.W. 654 , 657 (Tex.Civ.App.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1977

, but the Board has not yet taken final action. … Citv of Cleburne v. Brown, 11 S,W. 404 (Tex. 1889); City of Cleburne v. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry.

Opinion No.

Texas Attorney General Reports · Nov 26, 1997

Renfro Drug Co. v. Lawson , 160 S.W.2d 246 , 250 (Tex. 1942). 16 James v. Brown , 637 S.W.2d 914 , 916-17 (Tex. 1982); Reagan v. Guardian Life Ins. … Corp. v. Miller , 605 S.W.2d 943 , 953 (Tex.Civ.App.

Opinion No.

Texas Attorney General Reports · Nov 24, 1980

Teacher Retirement System v. Duckworth, 264 S.W.2d 98 (Tex. 1954). See Farrar v. Board of Trustees of Employees Retirement System, 243 S.W.2d 688 (Tex. 1951). Cf. Bolen v. … Brown v. Sneed, 14 S.W. 248 (Tex. 1890). See Hatcher v. State, 81 S.W.2d 499 (Tex. 1935); Bolton v. State, 154 S.W. 1197 (Tex.Crim.App. 1913). See also V.T.C.S. art. 6228a, § 10; Penal Code § 39.01 Educ. Code § 3.06.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1941

Artiole V. … Sea Miller V. Brown, 216 S. 1. 462, T.C. A., 1919, B. S. 2750, 1911, where the I court held that @o statute form1 th6 only beir for offioial aotion of the co6deeioner6~ court.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1959

A duly attested copy of a resolution of the State Board of Trustees designating such person shall be filed with said Comptroller as hla authorlty For Issuing such warrants.” … Brown, Jr. REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: W. V. Geppert

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1963

Moore v. Sheppard> su ra. Attorney Qeneralts Opinion V-1253 (1951). … Moore v.

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion: KP-0505

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jan 16, 2026

Over a half-century would pass before the Court would come to vindicate Justice Harlan’s position with Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483, 491 (1954). … Brown, 347 U.S. at 495.

Opinion No.

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jun 16, 1987

In Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 (1943), the Supreme Court established the "state action" exemption from the federal antitrust laws. … The standards for applying the Parker v. Brown doctrine, as articulated by the federal courts, are as follows: 1. The alleged anticompetitive activity must be mandated by the state acting as sovereign; 2.

Opinion No.

Texas Attorney General Reports · May 27, 2003

Code Ann. § 22.051 , 22.051(c) (Vernon 1996); Downing v. Brown , 935 S.W.2d 112 (Tex. 1996). … See Moseley v. City of Dallas , 17 S.W.2d 36 (Tex. Comm'n.

Opinion No.

Texas Attorney General Reports · Oct 28, 2004

See also Fletcher v. Howard , 39 S.W.2d 32 , 35 (Tex. 1931) (bond proceeds may not be diverted from highway described in county order); Robbins v. … See Brown v. Blum , 9 S.W.3d 840 , 846 at n. 8 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, pet. dism'd w.o.j.) (election is void when city is wholly without authority to call the election).

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1961

Finally, Randell v. … V. Geppert, Chairman Charles Lind Glenn Brown Gordon C. Cass REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: Howard W. Mays

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports · Jul 2, 1946

Jur. 32; Thompson v. Cutton, 96 Tex. 205, 71 S.W. 54r f ffulf,West Texas lkPacific R. C. v. Cornell, 84 Tex. 541, 19 S.W. 703; Parker v. Brown, 80 Tex. 555, 16 S.W. 262; Austin v. Bu~gan, 46 Tex. 236; Ximbro v. … Rsmllton, 28 Tex. 560; Lam- bert v. Weir, 27 Tex. 362; Smlth'e Mmlnistratora v. Oar%a, 15 Trx. 150; Wi field v. Smith, (Clv. App.) 241 9. W. 531; Spear- man v. Wms, T civ. App.) 207 S. W. 572; Peterson v.

Opinion No.

Texas Attorney General Reports · May 4, 1995

See Brown v. Lee, 371 S.W.2d 694 , 696 (Tex. 1963). Similarly, a court of civil appeals has concluded that a spouse's disability insurance policy is a property right belonging to the community estate. Mathews v. … Code § 23.26(b) (providing board of trustees with exclusive power to manage and govern district's schools); Patten v. Concho County, 196 S.W.2d 833 , 835 (Tex.Civ.App.