Case law

Carroll v. Hunt

140 Tex. 424 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1943

In Browne v. King, 111 Texas 330 , 235 S. W. 522 , D. F. and J. A. Acebo, who claimed to own certain land, executed a power *429 of attorney by which they authorized W. H. … The necessity for future action on Browne’s part as the condition for the vestiture of any interest in his favor, made the contract purely executory.” See also Hazlett v. Harwood, 80 Texas 508 , 16 S. W. 310 ; Taylor v.

Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. White

82 Tex. 543 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1891

Brown, receiver of the Texas & Pacific Railway. Brown was discharged as receiver, and plaintiff prosecuted suit against the railway company. … Railway v. Johnson, 76 Texas, 421 .

Subaru of America, Inc. v. David McDavid Nissan, Inc.

45 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 907 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 27, 2002

V, § 8. … V.

Gibson Distributing Co. v. Downtown Development Ass'n of El Paso

572 S.W.2d 334 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1978

Brown are discussed in that Louisiana case and in the recent lawyer-advertising case of Bates and O’Steen v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350 , 97 S.Ct. 2691 , 53 L.Ed.2d 810 (1977). … Rather, the court held, such state action fell within the exemption announced in Parker v. Brown. 2 See also, Taylor Drug Stores, Inc. v. Associated Dry Goods Corporation, 560 F.2d 211 (6th Cir. 1977).

Howell v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Lubbock, Inc.

23 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 374 · Texas Supreme Court · May 21, 1980

A similar holding was made in Brock v. Brock, 586 S.W.2d 927 (Tex.Civ.App.—El Paso 1979, no writ). … A contrary result was reached in Brown v. Brown, 590 S.W.2d 808 (Tex.Civ.App.—Eastland 1979, no writ), wherein the court disagreed with Brock v. Brock, supra. We disapprove the holdings in this case and Brock v. Brock.

Jasper State Bank v. Braswell

130 Tex. 549 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1938

Duke v. Reed, 64 Texas 705, 715 ; Browne v. King, 111 Texas 330, 336 , 235 S. W. 522 ; Hannay, Admr., v. Thompson, 14 Texas 142 ; French v. Grenet, 57 Texas 273 ; Calhoun v. Lumpkin, 60 Texas 185 ; Rodriguez v. … W. 1114 ; Browne v. King, 111 Texas 330 , 235 S. W. 522 .

Irvin v. Bevil

80 Tex. 332 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1891

Kavanaugh v. Brown, 1 Texas, 481 ; Austin & Clapp v. Jordan, 5 Texas, 130 ; Porter v. Miller, 7 Texas, 468 ; Andrews v. Ennis, 16 Texas, 45 ; Chapman v. Allen, 15 Texas, 278 ; Cartwright v. Chobert, 3 Texas, 261 . … Polk v. Chaison, 72 Texas, 500 ; Chamblee v. Tarbox, 27 Texas, 139 .

Roth v. Travelers' Protective Assn. of America

102 Tex. 241 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1909

Bacon on Benefit Societies, vol. 1, sec. 179; Goddard v. East Texas Fire Insurance Co., 67 Texas, 71 . … Embree kept a boarding house and Roth boarded with her. Plaintiff took her deposition, to which there were many objections by defendant. The following question was propounded to her: “4-c-Q.

Caven v. Coleman

100 Tex. 467 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1907

(Chase v. Swayne, 88 Texas, 225 ; Draper v. Noteware, 7 Cal., 278, 279 .) In order to support the remedy of mandamus a plain and unambiguous duty which it is designed to enforce must already have been imposed by law. … (Glasscock v. Commissioner, 3 Texas, 51 ; Bracken v. Wells, 3 Texas, 88 .)

City of San Angelo v. Boehme Bakery

144 Tex. 281 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1945

Schwind v. Goodman. (Com. App.) 221 S. W. 579 ; O’Connor v. Overall Laundry, 98 Ind. App. 29 , 183 N. E. 134 ; 10 Am. Jur., Certiorari, Sec. 2. … It further found, in effect, that the board did not abuse its discretion. Whether or not the board abused its discretion is a question of law. City of University Park v. Hoblitzelle, 150 S. W. (2d) 169 ; Macauley v.

Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. John Summers

Texas Supreme Court · Apr 3, 2009

In Williams , a premises owner, Eastman, contracted with Brown & Root to provide occasional construction services. Id. at 675. Brown & Root subcontracted part of the work to Tracer. Id. … .”); Harris v.

Stewart v. State

42 Tex. 242 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1874

Brown and his sureties, as administrator fro tem. of the estate of Jacob Luder (who is alleged to have died without heirs), the same having been distributed by said Brown without lawful authority. … (Eccles v. Hill, 13 Texas R., 67; *244 Legg v. McNeil, 2 Texas R., 429; Graves v. Hall, 27 Texas 154 .) For this reason the appeal by the intervener will he dismissed. Dismissed.

Byron D. Neely, Individually, and Byron D. Neely, M.D., P.A. v. Nanci Wilson, CBS Stations Group of Texas, L.P., D/B/A Keye-Tv and Viacom, Inc.

57 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 224 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 28, 2013

See Gulbenkian v. … Casso v.

Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Black

87 Tex. 160 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1894

BROWN, Associate Justice. The Court of Civil Appeals filed the following conclusions of fact in the above cause, in which judgment had been rendered by the District Court against the plaintiff in error. … “In 1887, Frank Black, a boy about 12 years of age, and stepson of appellee, James Black, boarded a freight train of appellant, at the T. C.

Clawson v. Texas Employers Insurance Ass'n

15 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 172 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1972

This assumption seems more in keeping with the policy we staked out for the Board in Employers Reinsurance Corporation v. Holt, 410 S.W.2d 633 (Tex.1966). … See Touchy v. Houston Legal Foundation, 432 S.W.2d 690 (Tex.1968); Miller v. Lloyds Alliance, 259 S.W.2d 777 (Tex.Civ.App.—San Antonio 1953, writ ref’d n. r. e.).

in Re Zach Brown

Texas Supreme Court · Sep 9, 2022

Brown does not raise the mootness issue in this Court. 2The court of appeals also granted relief from Brown’s trial subpoena seeking to compel FedEx employee Michael Sear, whom Brown’s counsel deposed in Pennsylvania … P. 47.1; see Cardwell v. Whataburger Rests. LLC, 484 S.W.3d 426, 428 (Tex. 2016).

Titus v. Johnson

50 Tex. 224 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1878

In support of these objections we are referred to the cases of Brown v. Moore, 38 Tex., 645 ; Johnson v. Brown, 25 Tex. Supp., 120; and Johnson v. Newman, 43 Tex., 628 . … We„ cannot perceive, however, that the last two of these cases have any bearing whatever upon the question, and the case of Brown v.

Ward v. Charter Oak Fire Insurance Co.

22 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 184 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1979

Board’s ruling. … Yancy v. Texas General Indemnity Co., 425 S.W.2d 683 (Tex.Civ.App.—Tyler 1968, writ ref’d n. r.. e.); Taylor v. Royal Indemnity Co., 276 S.W.2d 412 (Tex.Civ.App.

In Re Reece

54 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1031 · Texas Supreme Court · May 27, 2011

Panel 2008) (four suits by fired employee against employer, supervisor, and members of board of trustees alleging breach of contract, defamation, and other causes of action); In re Cano Petroleum, Inc., 283 S.W.3d 179 (Tex … CHIEF JUSTICES STONE and WRIGHT and JUSTICE BROWN concur.

Moore v. Stark

118 Tex. 565 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1929

Fifth. “ T give and bequeath to my beloved daughter, Carrie Brown, widow of E. W. … In Dickson v. Dickson, 5 S. W. (2d) 744 , Presiding Judge Short, for the Commission of Appeals, cited, with approval, the Abrams v.