Case law

Davis v. City of Austin

632 S.W.2d 331 · Texas Supreme Court · May 26, 1982

Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Board of Equalization, 419 S.W.2d 345, 349 (Tex.1967). … Board of Equalization, 419 S.W.2d 345 (Tex.1967); A&M Consolidated Independent School District v. Fickey, 542 S.W.2d 735 (Tex.Civ.App.—Waco 1976, writ ref’d n. r. e.); Brown v.

Lesley v. VETERANS LAND BD. OF STATE

54 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1705 · Texas Supreme Court · Aug 26, 2011

DAVID’S COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION, PETITIONERS, v. … Partner, Inc. v. Rubio, 185 S.W.3d 842, 847 (Tex. 2005). Whether a claim falls within the scope of section 74.001(a)(13) is not determined from the form of the plaintiff’s pleadings. See Yamada v.

Morris v. Hand

70 Tex. 481 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1888

Brown, committee of Jacob S. Hand, which showed that, on the seventh day of April, 1859, Hand was adjudged a lunatic, and that Brown was appointed committee of his estate. … (Mosby v. Burrow, 52 Texas, 404 ; Paschal v. Acklin, 27 Texas, 175 ; Watts v. Waddle, 6 Pet,, 400; Booth v. Clark, 17 Howard, 322 ; Wadkins v. Holman, 16 Pet., 25 ; Page v.

Greene v. Robison

109 Tex. 367 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1919

Citing Davis v. … The Act placed their control in the hands of the Land Board with ample powers to ■effect its purpose. As already stated, those powers, under the holding' of Colquitt-Tigner Mining Co. v.

City of Beaumont v. Fall

116 Tex. 314 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1927

However, under authority of the decision of the Commission of Appeals in Brown v. Fidelity Investment Company, 280 S. … Appellant bases its contention primarily upon the Commission of Appeals’ opinion in Brown v.

Faires v. Young

69 Tex. 482 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1888

(Brown v. Boulder, 18 Texas, 432 .) In that case the defendant had gone to another county for the purpose only of preparing a home for his family, and had taken with him only a portion of his property. … The facts in this case are not .much stronger than in those of Walker v. Walker, 22 Texas, 331 .

W. D. Cleveland & Co. v. Carr

90 Tex. 393 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1897

Brown Bros, and Co. declined to make 'the loan upon the lands alone, requiring the endorsement, or guaranty, of Cleveland and Co. and Halfl: and Eeubouer Bros., and the two latter agreed with Brown Bros, and Chandler, who … In the case of Railway v.

Kimball v. Houston Oil Co.

100 Tex. 336 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1907

Co. v. Milliken, 64 Texas, 46 ; Chance v. Branch, 58 Texas, 490 ; Cousins v. Grey, 60 Texas, 346 .) … In Johnson v.

Russell Et Ux. v. Martin

121 Tex. 488 · Texas Supreme Court · May 16, 1932

V. … Bell v. Blackwell, 283 S. W., 765 ; Davis v. Hill, 298 S. W., 526 .

Smith v. Texas & New Orleans Railroad

101 Tex. 405 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1908

The principle is illustrated by the decision in the case of Thorington v. Smith ( 8 Wall., 1 ). … (Roberts v. Yarboro, 41 Texas, 449 .) The rule, though seemingly harsh, is not so from the fact that the law will allow the bailee time in which to determine his rights (Roberts v.

Sysco Food Services, Inc. v. Trapnell

890 S.W.2d 796 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 16, 1995

See Tarter v. … See Hunter v. Fort Worth Capital Corp., 620 S.W.2d 547, 553 (Tex.1981); Brown & Root, Inc. v. Rust Eng'g, 679 S.W.2d 576, 578 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 1984, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Nacogdoches County v.

Harrell v. Mexico Cattle Co.

73 Tex. 612 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1889

It was also alleged that subsequently in a proceeding in favor of the First National Bank of Colorado against Brown ■as defendant and the present appellee as garnishee the shares were sold .as the property of Brown and that … In Allen v.

Fossil Group, Inc. v. Nicole Harris

Texas Supreme Court · Jun 14, 2024

We conclude that Harris waived any challenge to the trial court’s judgment with respect to Brown by failing to brief it. See Nall v. … Green v.

State v. Brownlow

53 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1100 · Texas Supreme Court · Aug 27, 2010

It argues this right tacitly inures to every condemned easement under City of San Antonio v. Mullaly, 33 S.W. 256 (Tex.Civ.App.-San Antonio 1895, no writ), and City of La Grange v. Brown, 161 S.W. 8 (Tex.Civ.App. … Brown, 161 S.W. at 11 (quoting City of New Haven v. Sargent, 38 Conn. 50, 55-56 (Conn.1871)).

Cearley v. Cearley

20 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 102 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1976

A similar analogy was made in Brown v. Brown, supra, with respect to the community interest in a contingent fee earned during the marriage but which had not matured at the time of the divorce. See Waters v. … Brown v. Brown, supra; Kirkham v. Kirkham, supra.

Powell v. Haley

28 Tex. 52 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1866

It is assigned as error, that the court refused to admit the deed from Friar to Brown, and the intermediate deeds from Brown to the Prudhommes. … (Biscoe v. Bronaugh, 1 Tex., 340 ; Baldwin v. Gordon, 24 Tex., 288 .) It is believed that the evidence is not of such a character as to show the verdict to be clearly wrong.

Moreland v. Leslie

140 Tex. 170 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1942

Moreover, that case was cited with approval in Brown Express, Inc., v. Arnold et ux, 138 Texas 70 , 157 S. … Brown Express, Inc., v. Arnold et ux, supra, is but an application of the principal theretofore stated in Compton v. Elliott, 126 Texas 232 , 88 S.

Grimes v. Corporation of Bastrop

26 Tex. 310 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1862

(Clay v. Holbert, 14 Tex., 189 ; Ruis v. Chambers, 15 Tex., 586 ; Andrews v. Marshall, Austin Term, 1862.) … The court most manifestly erred in overruling appellant’s objections to the field notes sworn to by the surveyor Brown in 1848. *313 It cannot for a moment be maintained that the ex parte affidavit of Brown gave to them any

Willis v. Johnson

23 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 578 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1980

Brown, 584 S.W.2d 284 (Tex.Civ.App.-Dallas 1979, writ granted), with regard to the proper submission of the liability issues •in such a case. … Brown v. American Transfer & Storage Co., 601 S.W.2d 931 (Tex.1980). Broad issues are approved by this court in Deceptive Trade Practices cases. Brown v. American Transfer & Storage Co., supra; Spradling v.

Creamer v. Briscoe

101 Tex. 490 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1908

Mills v. Brown, fully recognizes as applicable to such cases the principle, more fully discussed afterwards in the case of Welder v. … And Mills v. Brown expressly holds that the right to such homestead donations has its incipiency in the actual settlement upon the land. It is true that the claimant under the husband in Mills v.