Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstex

8,088 results

2.61s

  • Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission v. Carlin

    15 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 216 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1972

    See Department of Public Safety of State of Texas v. Austin, 163 Tex. 280 , 354 S.W.2d 376 ; Chapman v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 377 S.W.2d 953 ; Milam v. … Brown, Tex.Civ.App., 196 S.W.2d 691 (wr. ref.). These cases were attacks on orders forfeiting a cigarette permit and revoking a real estate dealer’s license.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Winnt v. International & Great Northern Railroad

    5 L.R.A. 172 · Texas Supreme Court · May 14, 1889

    Ry. v. Cowser, 57 Texas, 305 ; I. & G. N. Ry. and M. P. Ry. v. … Ry. v. Baker, 57 Texas, 424 .

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Holloway v. Fifth Court of Appeals

    32 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 237 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1989

    Browning v. Ryan, 756 S.W.2d at 384 . … For a more detailed recitation of the history of this litigation, see Browning v. Navarro, 743 F.2d 1069 (5th Cir.1984), Browning v. Navarro, 826 F.2d 335 (5th Cir.1987), and Browning v.

    Cited 400 timesPublished
  • Texas Tech University System and Texas Tech University System Board of Regents v. Pureza "Didit" Martinez

    Texas Supreme Court · Jun 14, 2024

    Heckman v. … Univ. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Henderson Mercantile Co. v. First National Bank

    100 Tex. 344 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1907

    BROWN, Associate Justice. … Co. v. Faulkner, 88 Texas, 649 ; 7 Thompson on Corp., sec. 8550.) In Railway v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Hill v. Still

    19 Tex. 76 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1857

    R. 247, directions for reforming case of Estis v. Browning.) … And generally he must do that by showing full performance or readiness to perform, (Browning v. Estis, 3 Tex.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Mann v. Dublin Cotton Oil Co.

    92 Tex. 377 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1898

    BROWN, Associate Justice. … As to the manner of certifying questions to this court, we invite attention to Railway v. Zantzinger, this day decided by this court.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Texas Tech University System and Texas Tech University System Board of Regents v. Pureza "Didit" Martinez

    Texas Supreme Court · Jun 14, 2024

    Sys. v. … We rejected a similar argument in County of Cameron v. Brown, 80 S.W.3d 549 (Tex. 2002).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Montgomery Independent School District v. Davis

    44 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 143 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 7, 2000

    See, e.g., Texas Health Facilities Comm’n v. … See Webb v.

    Cited 236 timesPublished
  • International-Great Northern Railroad v. Lowry

    132 Tex. 272 · Texas Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1938

    He was not required or expected in the performance of his duties to board or alight from trains in motion. … His act that caused his injury was not the instinctive result of fear or fright, as in Beck v. Browning, 129 Texas 7 , 101 S. W. (2d) 545 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Browne v. King

    111 Tex. 330 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1921

    The necessity for future action on Browne’s part as the condition for the vestiture of any interest in his favor, made the contract purely executory. Hazlett v. Harwood, 80 Texas, 508 ; Taylor v. Taul, 88 Texas, 665 . … Bradford v. Knowles, 86 Texas, 505 .

    Cited 51 timesPublished
  • Scottish-American Mortgage Co. v. Davis

    96 Tex. 504 · Texas Supreme Court · May 11, 1903

    Blake v. Insurance Co., 67 Texas, 163 ; Bryant v. Booze, 55 Ga., 445 ; Levy v. Cohen, 4 Ga., 13 ; Moore v. Pierson, 6 Iowa, 292 ; Vassar v. Camp, 11 N. Y., 441 ; Hunt v. Higman, 30 N. W. Rep., 769 ; Hallock v. … Insurance Co., 2 Dutch., 280; Dunlop v. Higgins, 1 H. L. C., 397. Any number of authorities to the same effect might be added.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Woods v. Reilly

    147 Tex. 586 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1949

    All funds thus- accumulated, except those sufficient to meet immediate payments that might become due each year, were to be invested by the State Board of Trustees, created by the Act, in government bonds, and the net income … City of Dallas v. Trammell, 129 Texas 150 , 101 S. W. (2d) 1009 .

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Kevin Burke, Jeffrey Schwartz Burke, Tracy Ruth Burke, Lucky Burke, Cindy Bernat, Pam Burke Daily, Barbara Burke Harberg, Lori Ilene Quinta Valle, Fonda Glazer, and Kim Brown v. Houston Pt Bac Office Limited Partnership (Bank of America)

    Texas Supreme Court · Dec 19, 2025

    Underwriters v. Brock, 211 S.W. 779, 780-81 (Tex. 1919). … Co. v. TUCO, Inc., 960 S.W.2d 629, 632 (Tex. 1997).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Emmons v. Pacific Indemnity Co.

    146 Tex. 496 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1948

    See e. g., Ayers v. Parker, D. C., 15 F. Supp. 447 . … The case of Brown v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 135 Texas 533 , 145 S. W. (2d) 171 , involved a suit under the Workmen’s Compensation Act to set aside an award of the Industrial Accident Board.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Leary v. Peoples Building, Loan, & Savings Ass'n

    93 Tex. 1 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1899

    BROWN, Associate Justice. Daniel T. … Building Assn. v. Griffin, 90 Texas, 486 ; Bringhurst v. Building Assn., 47 S. W. Rep., 831 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • City of Austin v. McCall

    95 Tex. 565 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 9, 1902

    BROWN, Associate Justice. … Otoe County v. Baldwin, 111 U. S., 16 .

    Cited 69 timesPublished
  • Kennedy Hodges, L.L.P. v. Ventura Gobellan, Jr. and Paula Gobellan

    57 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 584 · Texas Supreme Court · May 16, 2014

    As we explain below, the court of appeals’ decision conflicts with our decision in Perry Homes v. … Here, Kennedy Hodges’s litigation with Brown in the Brown Suit did not substantially invoke the litigation process with the Gobellans, who were not parties to the Brown Suit.

    Cited 45 timesPublished
  • Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Wood

    56 L.R.A. 592 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1902

    BROWN, Associate Justice. … King v. Vantandillo, 4 Maule & S., 75; King v. Burnett, Id., 273; Haag v. Board of Commissioners, 60 Ind., 511 ; 28 Am. Rep., 654 ; Smith v. Baker, 20 Fed. Rep., 709; Metrop. Asylum Dist. v. Hill, 6 Appeal Cases, 204.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Fkm Partnership, Ltd., a Texas Limited Partnership v. Board of Regents of the University of Houston System

    Texas Supreme Court · Jun 6, 2008

    Box 12548 (MC 059) Austin, TX 78711-2548 RE: Case Number: 05-0661 Court of Appeals Number: 14-03-00392-CV Trial Court Number: 712,808 Style: FKM PARTNERSHIP, LTD., A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. … BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON SYSTEM Dear Counsel: Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed opinions and judgment in the above-referenced cause.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.