Case law

Brown v. Goldstein

28 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 241 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1985

Garza v. Alviar, 395 S.W.2d 821 (Tex.1965). Brown’s contributory negligence issues on improper lookout and failure to properly apply the brakes were submitted to the trial court in substantially correct form. … See DeWinne v. Allen, 154 Tex. 316, 320 , 277 S.W.2d 95, 98 (1955). See also Lynch v. Ricketts, 158 Tex. 487 , 314 S.W.2d 273 (1958). Here the evidence is conflicting.

Anderson v. Brown

16 Tex. 554 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1856

Brown v. State

38 Tex. 482 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1873

(Villareal v. The State, 26 Texas, 107 ; and 23 Texas, 557 ; 27 Texas, 146, 438 , 765 ; 28 Texas, 711 ; 29 Texas, 500 ; 31 Texas, 608, 575 ; 30 Texas, 472 ; 33 Texas, 660 .)

Brown v. Gay

76 Tex. 444 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1890

Brown, receiver of the Texas Pacific Railway. The action is founded on claim that John M. … Wilson v. Wilson, 1 Barb. Ch., 592 ; Palmer v. Murray, 8 How. Prac., 549 ; Searcy v. Stubbs, 12 Ga., 438 ; Lehigh Co. v. Railway, 42 N. J. Eq., 591; Talmage v. Pell, 9 Paige Ch., 413 ; Sheldon v. Adams, 27 How.

Brown v. Lane

19 Tex. 203 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1857

(Converse & Co. v. McKee, 14 Tex. R. 20 ; Bryan et al. v. Bridge et al., 6 Tex. R. 137.) … In Kentucky, (McLaughlin’s Adm’rs v.

Brown v. Cates

99 Tex. 133 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1905

Brown by virtue of a paramount title. … Bradford v. Knowles, 86 Texas, 505 .

Brown v. Seaman

65 Tex. 628 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1886

Francis v. North-cote, 6 Tex. 185 ; Martel v. Martel, 17 Tex. 392 . There is no reason why it should be required in a suit by an administrator against a survivor in community and his sureties. … We have already determined, at the present term, in the case of Huppman v.

Neyland v. Brown

141 Tex. 253 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1943

McAfee v. Travis Gas Corporation, 137 Texas 314 , 153 S. W. (2d) 442 ; Chalmers v. Gumm, 137 Texas 467 , 154 S. W. (2d) 640 ; Johnson v. Wood, 138 Texas 106 , 157 S. W. (2d) 146 ; Le Master v. … W. (2d) 224 ; Rodriquez v. Higginbotham-Bailey-Logan Co., 138 Texas 476 , 160 S. W. (2d) 234 . As pointed out in Le Master v.

Brown v. Chenoworth

51 Tex. 469 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1879

In the case of Dean v. … (McMillan v. Croft, 2 Tex., 397 ; Thompson v. Cartwright, 1 Tex., 87 ; Butler v. Robertson, 11 Tex., 143 ; Andrews v. Hoxie, 5 Tex., 183 ; Jackson v. Elliott, 49 Tex., 69 .)

May v. Brown

144 Tex. 350 · Texas Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1945

Brown as proponent. … In McElroy v.

Brown v. Havard

23 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 161 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1980

In Smith v. … In Miles v.

Risien v. Brown

73 Tex. 135 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1889

Hancock v. Butler, 21 Texas, 816 . … Harrison v. Boring, 44 Texas, 269 .

Smith v. Brown

66 Tex. 543 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1886

Hancock v. Butler, 21 Tex., 804 . As was said in Braman v. … Brown & Co., and the sale thereunder; and that for this reason appellant’s title should have prevailed in the court below.

Brown v. Shiner

84 Tex. 505 · Texas Supreme Court · May 3, 1892

We have not under consideration the precise question that was before the court in Smisson v. The State. … Supreme Court in Swenson v.

Brown v. Torrey

22 Tex. 54 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1858

(Weaver v. Shaw, 5 Tex. Rep, 286.) This case is plainly distinguishable from those in which affidavits have been received by this court, upon the question of its own jurisdiction. (Harris v. Hopson, 5 Tex. … Rep. 529 ; Dial v. Rector, 12 Tex. Rep. 99 ; Martel v. Hernsheim, 9 id. 294.) The judgment is affirmed. Judgment affirmed.

Brown v. Meyer

33 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 207 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1990

In Strake , the chairman of the Republican Party of Texas refused to accept Senator Brown’s application to be a candidate in the primary race for Attorney General in 1986 because he had held legislative office when an across-the-board … As we noted in Spears v.

Turner v. Brown

7 Tex. 489 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1852

. — Henderson v. Kissam, S T., 46; Greenwood v. Anderson, 8 T., 225; Pridgin v. Strickland, 8 T.,427; Bell v. McDonald, 9 T., 378; Tousey v. Butler, 9 T.,525; Tryon v. Butler, 9 T.,653; Williams v. … Randon, ID T., 74; Kinney v. Lee, 10 T., 155; Pridgen v. McLean, 12 T., 420; Whitehead v. Herron, 15 T., 127; Hopkins v. Wright, 17 T., 30; Chapman v. Sneed, 17 T„ 428; Thouve-nin v. Lea, 20 T., 012; Usher v.

Neill v. Brown

11 Tex. 17 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1853

Brown v. Pridgen

56 Tex. 124 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1882

Pridgen and contestant lived some four of five miles from each other; the son of Pridgen went to Brown’s house with a carriage and carried Mrs. Brown home with him, and it was then she made the will. … Phillips heard a conversation between her and Pridgen in regard to Brown’s money and property. Pridgen left to get water; Mrs. Brown was crying at the time, and remarked to Dr. Phillips that she had been persuaded.

Brown v. State

36 Tex. 282 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1872

Brown, the intervenor, who has appealed the case informa pauperis, claims eight hundred acres of the land. He assigns several causes of error. First. He complains that the court overruled his motion for a continuance.