Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterstex

8,088 results

1.66s

  • Joseph Nalle v. City of Austin

    101 Tex. 48 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1907

    Brown to do said paving, and that his bid had been accepted by the city; and that appellee had notified appellant to meet with its committee. and make any objection he might to the acceptance of the bid of said Brown; that … Brown v. Wheelock, 75 Texas, 387 . We are not to be understood as intimating an opinion as to the validity of the charter or the ordinance, or the proceedings had under them. Those questions are not properly before us.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Price v. Price

    30 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 510 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1987

    Crabb, 281 N.W.2d 616 (Iowa 1979); Brown v. Gosser, 262 S.W.2d 480 (Ky.1953); MacDonald v. MacDonald, 412 A.2d 71 (Me.1980); Boblitz v. … Boblitz, 296 Md. 242 , 462 A.2d 506 (1983) (rule abrogated as to vehicular torts); Brown v. Brown, 381 Mass. 231 , 409 N.E.2d 717 (1980); Hosko v. Hosko, 385 Mich. 39 , 187 N.W.2d 236 (1971); Beadette v.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation, Inc. v. Lewellen

    952 S.W.2d 454 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 9, 1997

    Shell Oil Co., 145 Tex. 323 , 198 S.W.2d 424 (1946); Texas National Guard Armory Bd. v. McCraw, 132 Tex. 613 , 126 S.W.2d 627 (1939); Brown v. … Dist. v. Meno, 917 S.W.2d 717 (Tex.1995); Housing Auth. v. Higginbotham, 135 Tex. 158 , 143 S.W.2d 79 (1940); Texas Nat. Guard Armory Bd. v. McCraw, 132 Tex. 613 , 126 S.W.2d 627 (1939); Brown v.

    Cited 218 timesPublished
  • Freeman v. Freeman

    160 Tex. 148 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1959

    Poth v. Roosth, 146 Texas 7 , 202 S.W. 2d 442, 448 . In Browning v. … State v. Ferguson, supra; Cline v. Niblo, supra; State Board of Insurance v. Betts, supra. They are not void when rendered in violation of statutory provision which is merely directory, Simmons v.

    Overruled on other grounds by Mapco, Inc. v. Forrest, 33 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 303 (1990)Cited 93 timesPublished
  • Dallas Rapid Transit Railway Co. v. Payne

    98 Tex. 211 · Texas Supreme Court · Nov 7, 1904

    BROWN, Associate Justice. Robert L Payne, a minor, by his-next friend H. C. … Co. v. Williams, 91 Texas, 255 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Alexander

    122 Tex. 328 · Texas Supreme Court · May 3, 1933

    In Brown v. Wheelock, 75 Texas, 385 , 12 S. W., 111 , it was held that the act of the district judge in removing the disabilities of a minor was not a judicial act. See, also, Cunningham v. … See, also, Kirk v. Murphy, 16 Texas, 654 ; Gaal v. Townsend, 77 Texas, 464 .

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • State v. Black Bros.

    116 Tex. 615 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1927

    Brown appealed. … Co. v. Board of Railroad Commissioners, 162 Mass., 83 , 38 N. E., 27 .

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Carr v. Radkey

    8 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 536 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 28, 1965

    After Brown v. … Hatton v. State Board of Control, 146 Tex. 160 , 204 S.W.2d 390 (1947). It is also undisputed that Miss Hewlett was taken and held without her consent.

    Cited 51 timesPublished
  • Central Education Agency v. Independent School District

    152 Tex. 56 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1953

    Consolidated Underwriters v. Kirby Lumber Co., Tex. Com. App., 267 S.W. 703 ; State v. Parker, 61 Texas 265 ; Gunter v. Texas, etc. Co., 82 Texas 496 , 17 S.W. 840 ; Bitter v. Bexar County, Tex. Com. … App., 11 S.W. 2d 163 ; Doeppenschmidt v. International & G. N. R. Co., 100 Texas 532 , 101 S.W. 1080 ; Dellinger v. State, 115 Texas Cr. R. 480, 28 S.W. 2d 537 ; Davis v. State, 88 Texas Cr.

    Cited 51 timesPublished
  • In RE REPUBLICAN PARTY OF TEXAS v. the State of Texas

    Texas Supreme Court · Jul 13, 2020

    Brown Convention Center, which it operates for the City of Houston, to the Republican Party of Texas to hold its 2020 State Convention July 13–18. 1 The termination letter invoked a force majeure clause in the Agreement … Houston First is “a local government corporation [that] is city- controlled and tax-funded with a budget approved by [the City] and a board appointed by the mayor.” City of Houston v. Hous. Mun. Emps.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Logue v. Southern Kansas Railway Co.

    106 Tex. 445 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1914

    Chibe Justice BROWN delivered the opinion of the court. … Co. v. Faulkner, 88 Texas, 651 , 32 S. W., 883 .

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • State v. Robison

    119 Tex. 302 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1930

    Brown and Frank K. Campbell, Jr. … White v. Martin, 66 Texas, 340 ; Jumbo Cattle Co. v. Bacon, 79 Texas, 5 ; Standifer v. Wilson, 93 Texas, 232 ; Tatum v. Kincannon, 54 Texas Civ. App., 633, 119 S. W., 113 .

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Tarrant County Water Control & Improvement District Number One v. Wilson

    163 Tex. 522 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1962

    The only case cited by the Attorney General is Brown County Water Improvement District No. 1 v. Austin Mill and Grain Co., 135 Texas 140 , 138 S.W. 2d 523 . … Indebtedness is not created until bonds are issued and sold, Town of Freeport v. Sellers, 144 Texas 389 , 190 S.W. 2d 813 ; City of Austin v. Valle, Texas Civ.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Gaulding v. Celotex Corp.

    32 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 439 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1989

    Corporation, five alleged manufacturers of asbestos-containing board. … Recently, the California court further explained its application of market share liability in Brown v. Superior Court, 44 Cal.3d 1049 , 245 Cal.Rptr. 412 , 751 P.2d 470 (1988).

    Cited 93 timesPublished
  • Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Leighty

    88 Tex. 604 · Texas Supreme Court · Nov 4, 1895

    The tender had been left, as above stated, by Brown, a hostler at Choctaw switch, without any lights thereon to indicate its position, and the night was dark. … All trains will look out for-signal board at Choctaw pit office. “E. W. Campbell, Train Master.”

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Railroad Commission of Texas v. Shell Oil Co.

    139 Tex. 66 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1942

    The same holding was made by this Court in Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co., 126 Texas 296 , 83 S. W. (2d) 935 , 87 S. W. (2d) 1069 , 101 A. L. R. 1393. … Wright v. Allen, 257 S. W. 980 , par. 4 (writ refused) ; Young County Board of School Trustees v. Bailey, 61 S. W. (2d) 130 , par. 2 (writ refused).

    Cited 248 timesPublished
  • Pecos & N. T. Ry. Co. v. Rosenbloom

    107 Tex. 296 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1915

    The opinion delivered in the case by the late Chief Justice Brown on the original hearing, in its statement of the ease, is corrected in the following particulars so as to conform to the findings of fact made by the honorable … Ry. v. Seale, 229 U. S. 156 , 33 Sup. Ct 651, 57 L. Ed. 1129 , Ann. Cas. 1914C, 156, and N. C. R. Co. v. Zachary, 232 U. S. 248 , 34 Sup. Ct. 305, 58 L. Ed. 591 , Ann. Cas. 1914C, 159, are cited upon the question.

    Reversed on other grounds by Pecos & Northern Texas Railway Co. v. Rosenbloom, 240 U.S. 439 (1916)Cited 5 timesPublished
  • International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. Harris

    95 Tex. 346 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1902

    BROWN, Associate Justice. … Mayes v. Railway, 63 Iowa, 566 ; Swoboda v. Ward, 40 Mich., 420 ; Cole v. Railway, 67 Wis., 272 ; Hulehan v. Railway, 68 Wis., 520 ; Railway v. Tracy, 66 Fed. Rep., 931.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Wallace L. Hall, Jr., in His Official Capacity as a Regent for the University of Texas System v. William H. McRaven, in His Official Capacity as Chancellor for the University of Texas System

    60 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 315 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 27, 2017

    Brown & Gay Eng’g, Inc. v. Olivares, 461 S.W.3d 117, 121 (Tex. 2015). Its justification continues today as a means to protect the public treasury. Id. … Parks & Wildlife Dep't v.

    Cited 198 timesPublished
  • J-W Power Company v. Wise County Appraisal District and Wise County Appraisal Review Board

    Texas Supreme Court · Jun 21, 2024

    Wise County Appraisal District and Wise County Appraisal Review Board, Respondents ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from … P. 59.1, the court of appeals’ judgment is reversed in light of J-W Power Co. v. Sterling County Appraisal District, ___ S.W.3d ___, 2024 WL 2869325 (Tex. June 7, 2024).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.