Case law

Baker, Fleming & Hubert v. Brown

55 Tex. 377 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1881

Brown, the immediate vendor of plaintiff James M. Brown, may be considered as an indirect grant of the privileges of irrigation. This deed contained a reservation in favor of said J. W. … Brown, the vendor of plaintiff, were, by intervention and otherwise, either parties or privies.

Martin Brown Co. v. Perrill

77 Tex. 199 · Texas Supreme Court · May 6, 1890

Portis v. Cummings, 21 Texas, 265. … Braden v. Gose, 57 Texas, 37 .

Brown v. Abilene National Bank

70 Tex. 750 · Texas Supreme Court · May 25, 1888

(Conner v. Sampson, 22 Texas, 20 ; Stanley v. Epperson, 45 Texas, 650 .) No facts are shown by the application which can take this case out of the general rule.

City of Waxahachie v. Brown

67 Tex. 519 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1887

Construing this enactment, this court held, in Dwyer v. … In Robertson v.

Wagner & Brown, Ltd. v. Horwood

44 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 601 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 12, 2001

Du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Abernathy, No. 99-0246; Hidalgo Irrigation Dist. v. Ortega, No. 99-0754; Texas Alcoholic Beverage Comm'n v. Amusement and Music Operators, No. 99-0896; Wagner & Brown, Ltd. v. … School Dist. v. Lee, No. 99-1240; Carrera v. Yepez, No. 99-1259; University of Houston v. Elthon, No. 00-0044; Blum v. Brown, No. 00-0110; Exxon Co., U.S.A. v. Jack O. McCall Estate, No. 00-0541.

Churchill Forge, Inc. v. Brown

61 S.W.3d 368 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 10, 2002

See Lawrence v. CDB Servs., 44 S.W.3d 544, 555 (Tex.2001). . See, e.g., Publix Theatres Corp. v. … Green Int’l, Inc. v. Solis, 951 S.W.2d 384, 386 (Tex.1997). . See id. at 386-87 .

Boggs Bro. v. Brown, Receiver

82 Tex. 41 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1891

Brown, Receiver, v. Gay, 76 Texas, 444 . … Brown v. Gay, 76 Texas, 444 . The liability of the railway company under the facts pleaded has been so often decided, it is not now necessary to again discuss that question. Railway v.

Travelers Insurance Company v. Brown

9 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 368 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1966

Brown’s attorney was advised by the Industrial Accident Board, on or about August 22, 1962, that the insurer had voluntary compensation coverage on the employer, but neither Brown nor his counsel knew the actual contents … The right of Brown to benefits provided in the policy is conferred and limited by the terms of the contract. In Western Union Telegraph Co. v.

Mills County v. Brown County

85 Tex. 391 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1892

Brown County was at that date indebted in the sum of $60,000 for certain expenditures previously incurred in the erection of public improvements, which remained exclusively within the limits of Brown after the creation of … When this suit was instituted, March 4, 1889, Brown County had paid $16,000 of this indebtedness.

Walker v. Brown, Thompson & Co.

66 Tex. 556 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1886

Walker represented themselves to be partners, and induced James Thompson, one of the •firm of Brown, Thompson & Co., to sell them goods, believing théfn to be partners, then it would make no difference whether they were such

H. Seeligson & Co. v. Brown

61 Tex. 114 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 12, 1884

See, also, Stone v. Brown, 54 Tex., 338 ; Strange v. H. & T. C. R. R. Co., 53 Tex., 169 ; Igleheart v. Moore, 21 Tex., 502 ; Le Gierse v. Moore, 59 Tex., 471 .

Brown v. Galveston Wharf Co.

92 Tex. 520 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1899

Beard v. City of Decatur, 64 Texas, 7 ; Fitzsimmons v. City of Brooklyn, 102 N. Y., 536 ; Mayor, etc., v. Woodward, 12 Heisk., 499 ; People v. Smyth, 28 Cal., 21 ; Carroll v. Siebenthaler, 37 Cal., 193 . … In Fitzsimmons v.

Diho Lloyd Brown v. State

Texas Supreme Court · Nov 2, 2016

In accordance with the enclosed Memorandum Opinion, below is the judgment in the numbered cause set out herein to be entered in the Minutes of this Court as of the 2[nd] day of November, 2016. 10-16-00229-CR DIHO LLOYD BROWN … v.

Brown Express, Inc. v. Arnold

138 Tex. 70 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1941

In obedience to a writ of mandamus issued by the Supreme Court (Brown Express Co., Inc., v. McClendon, 135 Texas 58 , 139 S. … See Compton v. Elliott, 126 Texas 232 , 88 S. W. (2d) 91 . A late case in point is Longhorn Drilling Corp. v. Padilla (Civ. App.), 138 S. W. (2d) 164 .

Altman v. Brown

278 S.W. 1114 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1924

See Decker v. Kirlicks, 112 Tex. 90 , 216 S. W. 385 .

McLeod v. Board

30 Tex. 238 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1867

In the case of Williams v. … (Bailey v. Wright, 18 Ves., 244; 1 Roper, 328; Robinson v. Brock, 1 H. & Munf., 213; Holmes v. Liptrot, 8 Ga., 279 ; Hamrico v. Laird, 10 Yerg., 222 ; Nevis v. Scott, 9 How., 196 ; Stilley v. Folger, 14 Ohio, 659.)

Brown & Co. v. Chancellor & Co.

3 Tex. L. R. 54 · Texas Supreme Court · May 15, 1884

Brown v. Hunter

38 Tex. 626 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1873

The objection raised to the return by the sheriff upon the citation is untenable, as clearly decided in Cummings v. Rice et at., 9 Texas, 528 ; and in Edmonson v. Yates, 25 Texas, 373 ; and in Graves v. … Robertson, 22 Texas, 131 ; and Thomas v. Bishop, 24 Texas, 302 . There is no sufficient error in the judgment of the lower court to authorize a reversal, and it is affirmed, without damages. Affibmed.

John Dayton Brown v. State

Texas Supreme Court · Feb 26, 2015

TENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS February 26, 2015 No. 10-14-00262-CR JOHN DAYTON BROWN … v.

Horton v. Brown

2 Tex. 79 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1847

After this cause was argued in a manner manifesting great ability and research, and submitted to us for consideration, the opinion of the court was delivered by the chief justice in the case of The Heirs of Kinchen Holliman v.