Case law

Frances Mafnas Davis v. State

Texas Supreme Court · Jun 8, 2018

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00398-CR FRANCES MAFNAS DAVIS, Appellant V. … DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order to Judge Andrea Thompson, Presiding Judge, 416th Judicial District Court; to Destiny Moses, official court reporter, 416th Judicial District Court; to retained counsel Kristen Brown

Warren v. Sanger Independent School District

116 Tex. 183 · Texas Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1926

Jennings v. Carson (Com. App.), 220 S. W., 1090 ; South S. A., etc., Dist. v. Martine (Texas Civ. App.), 275 S. W., 265 ; McCollum v. Adams (Texas Civ. App.), 110 S. W., 526 ; Trustees, etc., v. Dudney (Texas Civ. … In Crabb v. Celeste, etc. Dist. (Sup.), 146 S. W., 528 , a resort to the courts directly appears to have been sustained where the act of the school board sought to be enjoined was void.

State v. Thompson

64 Tex. 690 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1885

It is not to be presumed that the attorney-general was not advised or directed by the board to bring this suit. … Turner v. Caruthers, 17 Cal., 432 ; Clark v. Willett, 35 Cal., 534 ; People v. Mariposa County, 39 Cal., 683 ; McKiernan v. Patrick, 4 Howard (Miss.), 333; Lynn v. Glidwell, 8 Yerger, 2.

Lewis v. Independent Sch. Dist. of Austin

139 Tex. 83 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1942

City of Tyler v. Texas Employers Ins. Assn. (Com. App.), 288 S. W. 409 , id. 294 S. W. 195 ; Southern Casualty Co. v. Morgan (Com. App.), 12 S. W. (2d) 200 ; McCaleb v. Continental Casualty Co., 132 Texas 65 , 116 S. … Love v. City of Dallas, 120 Texas 351 , 40 S. W. (2d) 20 ; Hatcher v. State, 125 Texas *88 84, 81 S. W. (2d) 499 , 98 A. L. R. 1213; Dupuy v. State, 125 Texas Crim. Rep. 595 , 121 .S. W. (2d) 1003.

Trapp v. Shell Oil Co.

145 Tex. 323 · Texas Supreme Court · May 15, 1946

.” *348 It is stated in the case of Brown v. City of Galveston, 97 Texas, 1 , 75 S. … The rule with respect to an order of a board of equalization is that the same is valid unless it is shown that either the board was without jurisdiction or the board acted unlawfully to the prejudice of the complainant.

Ford Motor Company v. Ezequiel Castillo, Individually, Maria De Los Angeles Castillo, Individually and as Next Friend for A.C. and E.C., and Rosa Silvia Martinez, Individually

Texas Supreme Court · Jun 20, 2014

Ford Motor Co. v. … Irvine, 44 S.W. 1059 (Tex. 1898), and Browning-Ferris, Inc. v. Reyna, 865 S.W.2d 925 (Tex. 1993).

In Re D. Wilson Const. Co.

196 S.W.3d 774 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 30, 2006

In re Kellogg, Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d *783 732, 737 (Tex.2005); In re FirstMerit Bank, 52 S.W.3d 749, 753 (Tex.2001); Cantella & Co. v. Goodwin, 924 S.W.2d 943, 944 (Tex.1996) (per curiam) (orig.proceeding). … Ctr., Inc. v.

Clark v. Texas Home Health, Inc.

41 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 944 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1998

as March 13, 1993, the Board had not received the report. … Home Health misplaces reliance on City of Beaumont v. Bouillion, 896 S.W.2d 143 (Tex.1995).

Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Conley

260 S.W. 561 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1924

W. 222 ; Gilmore v. Houston Electric Co., 46 Tex. Civ. App. 315 , 102 S. W. 168 ; Schaff v. Gordon (Tex. Civ. App.) 214 S. W. 638 ; Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. Brown (Tex. Civ. App.) 205 S. W. 378 . … For cases of this character, see Levy v. Campbell (Tex. Sup.) 19 S. W. 438 ; G., C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Brown, 16 Tex. Civ. App. 53 , 40 S. W. 608 ; Pecos & N. T. Ry. Co. v. Trower, 61 Tex. Civ. App. 53 , 130 S.

Daniel v. Fort Worth & Rio Grande Railway Co.

96 Tex. 327 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1903

*328 BROWN, Associate Justice. … Railway Co. v. Fifth Baptist Church, 108 U. S., 317 ; Randolph v. Bloomfield, 77 Iowa, 52 ; Illinois C. Railway Co. v. Grabill, 50 Ill., 241 ; Pierce v. Wagner, 29 Minn., 355 ; Brown v. Chicago & A.

Texas A&M University - Kingsville v. Gertrud Moreno

399 S.W.3d 128 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 22, 2013

However, as we explain today in University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. … G O V ’T C O DE § 554.002(a). Moreno’s affidavit is clear that she did not report a violation of law to the Board.

Diamond Shamrock Refining & Marketing Co. v. Nueces County Appraisal District

876 S.W.2d 298 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1994

Co. v. Limbach, 61 Ohio St.3d 22, 572 N.E.2d 629, 631-32 (1991) (considering use tax on vessel used to ferry out-of-state goods from transfer facility in Ohio to final destination in Ohio); Board of Educ. v. … Holmes v.

Groce v. West Lumber Co.

106 Tex. 265 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1914

Chief Justice BROWN delivered the opinion of the court. Because the certificate submits the substantive law of the case this court has no jurisdiction, and the certificate is dismissed. … See article 1522, chapter 55, page 107, Laws Thirty-third Legislature; also see memorandum opinion in First State Bank of Archer City et al. v. F. M. Power, cause No. 2628, ante, p. —. Certificate dismissed.

City of Waco v. Mann

133 Tex. 163 · Texas Supreme Court · May 10, 1939

Bassett v. City of El Paso, 88 Texas 168 , 30 S. W. 893 ; Mitchell County v. City National Bank of Paducah, 91 Texas 361 , 43 S. W. 880 ; Presidio County v. City National Bank of Paducah (writ refused), 20 Texas Civ. … As declared in Judge Brown’s good opinion in Mitchell County v. Bank, 91 Tex. 370 , 43 S. W. 883 , and expressly sanctioned by the Supreme Court of the United States in Wade v. Travis County, 174 U. S. 506 , 19 Sup.

Traders & General Insurance v. Bulis

129 Tex. 362 · Texas Supreme Court · May 5, 1937

Casualty Co. v. Williams, 15 S. W. (2d) 553 . … American Employers’ Insurance Co. v. Singleton, (Com. App.) 24 S.

Boswell v. Terrell, Commissioner

97 Tex. 259 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1904

Under the decisions of this court in Willoughby v. Townsend, 93 Texas, 80 , and Ford v. … Brown, 96 Texas, 537 , the land was not subject to sale at the date of relator’s application and it could not take effect from its filing.

City of Dallas, Texas, Board of Adjustment of the City of Dallas, Texas, and Raj Sharma, in His Capacity as the Building Official of the City of Dallas v. Doug Vanesko and Grace Vanesko

Texas Supreme Court · Apr 7, 2006

of the City of Dallas, Petitioners v . … Padre Island v. Cantu , 52 S.W.3d 287 (Tex. App. C Corpus Christi 2001, no pet.); Bd. of Adjustment v. McBride , 676 S.W.2d 705 (Tex. App. C Corpus Christi 1984, no writ).

Lumberman's Reciprocal Ass'n. v. Behnken

112 Tex. 103 · Texas Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1922

E., 349 ; Edwards v. Wingham, 3 K. B. (Eng.) 596; 109 L. T. N. S., 50, 6 B. W. C. A., 511; Amys v. Barton (1912), 1 K B. (Eng.), 41. … lump sum compensation had been asserted before the Board.

International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sein

87 Tex. 310 · Texas Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1894

BROWN, Associate Justice. The facts in this case are the same as in International & Great Northern Railroad Company v. Sallie Neff et al., decided this day. … proceedings, and the clerk of this court is directed to transmit to said court, with the mandate herein, a *311 certified copy of the opinion of this court in the case of International & Great Northern Railroad Company v.

U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Garrett

129 Tex. 587 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 9, 1937

Board. … Co. v. Parker, 104 Texas 162, 165 , 135 S.