Case law

Clint v. Houston Ice Brewing Company

106 Tex. 508 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1914

BROWN, C. J. … We have thought it prudent to make this statement lest our refusal of the writ of error might be understood to overrule Ellis v. Water Co., 86 Tex. 109 , 23 S.

Manufacturers' Equipment Co. v. Cisco Clay & Coal Co.

118 Tex. 370 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1929

“We further held that under McCamey v. Hollister Oil Co., 241 S. W., 689 , by this court, and Hollister Oil Co. v. McCamey, 115 Texas, 49 , and Thompson v. … Willis v. Greiner, 26 S. W., 858 ; West Side Oil Co. v. McDorman, 244 S. W., 167 ; Spotswood v. Morris, 12 Idaho, 360 , 6 L. R. A., 665; 20 R. C. L, 1075-1076, Sec. 323.

Wright v. Texas Employers Insurance Ass'n

17 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 149 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1974

As was said in Houston Fire and Casualty Insurance Company v. … Travelers Insurance Co. v. Seabolt, 361 S.W.2d 204 (Tex.1962).

Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. McGuire

814 S.W.2d 385 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1991

Brune v. Brown Forman Corp., 758 S.W.2d at 831. From ancient times, the danger of alcoholism from prolonged and excessive consumption of alcoholic beverages has been widely known and recognized. See generally G. … Sharlot, Guide to Texas Rules of Evidence § 201.2 (Tex.Prac.1988) (requiring "high degree of indisputability" as prerequisite to judicial notice) with Brune v. Brown Forman Corp., 758 S.W.2d 827, 830-31 (Tex.

Urrutia v. Decker

42 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 521 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1999

Insurers who do not use board-approved policies and endorsements may be subject to penalty. Tex. Ins.Code art. 5.06(2); Springfield v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Ins. Co., 620 S.W.2d 557, 558 (Tex.1981). … Co. of N.Y. v. Daddy$ Money, Inc., 646 S.W.2d 255, 257 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1982, writ refd n.r.e.)(when policy has board approval but conflicting endorsement does not, insurer cannot enforce endorsement).

City of Dallas v. Dallas Consolidated Street Railway Co.

105 Tex. 337 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1912

To the same effect these further authorities may be cited: Townsen v. Mersfielder, 49 Texas Civ. App., 289,109 S. W. p. 420; Merrill v. Savage, 49 Texas Civ. App., 292, 109 S. W. p. 408; Dickey v. … Nor is the opinion of Chief Justice Gaines in Harding v. Commissioners, 95 Texas, 174 , subject to a construction in opposition to these views.

Motl v. Boyd

116 Tex. 82 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1926

Co. v. Board of Water Com., 168 U. S., 349 , 42 L. Ed., 497 ; Home etc. v. Commonwealth, 202 Mass., 422 , 24 L. R. A. (N. S.), 79, 82; Rundle v. Canal Co., 14 How. (U. S.), 80, 14 L. Ed., 335 . … McCoy v. Board of Directors, 95 Ark., 345, 29 L. R. A. (N. S.), 396, 399, 400; Kansas City-M. & B. R. Co. v. Smith, 72 Miss., 677 , 27 L. R. A., 762, 48 Am. St., 579.

Milliken v. City Council

54 Tex. 388 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1881

Milliken and the board of aldermen composing the city council, to recover the office. … Bradley v. McCrabb, Dallam, 506 ; Banton v. Wilson, 4 Tex., 400 ; Lindsey v. Luckett, 20 Tex., 516 ; McKinney v. O’Conner, 26 Tex., 5 ; The State v. De Gress, 53 Tex., 387 .

Mid-Continent Refrigerator Co. v. Tackett

22 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 527 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 25, 1979

This was not the case in 1967 at the time of Suarez v. Brown, 414 S.W.2d 537 (Tex.Civ.App. — Corpus Christi 1967, writ ref’d).

Ford Motor Company v. Ezequiel Castillo, Individually, Maria De Los Angeles Castillo, Individually and as Next Friend for A.C. and E.C., and Rosa Silvia Martinez, Individually

Texas Supreme Court · Oct 3, 2014

Ford Motor Co. v. … Irvine, 44 S.W. 1059 (Tex. 1898), and Browning-Ferris, Inc. v. Reyna, 865 S.W.2d 925 (Tex. 1993).

Lubbock County Water Control and Improvement District and Tommy Fisher, in His Official Capacity as President of the Board of Directors of the Lubbock County Water Control and Improvement District v. Church & Akin, L.L.C.

Texas Supreme Court · Jul 3, 2014

Kirby Lake Dev., Ltd. v. … , and a board subcommittee resolved claims disputes.”

Baughn v. Platt

123 Tex. 486 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1934

; that the servant of the ice companies deposited the 100 pound block of ice on the right running board as indicated by Baughn; that after the ice had been deposited on the running board of the car the servant of the ice … Ry. v. Bigham, 90 Texas, 223 , 38 S. W., 162 ; Union Stockyards v. Peeler (Com. App.), 37 S. W. (2d) 126 ; Houston & T. C. Ry. Co. v. Maxwell (Civ. App., writ ref.), 128 S. W., 160 .

General Crude Oil Company v. Aiken

162 Tex. 104 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 22, 1961

As pointed out in Brown v. Lundell, supra, the Warren-Martin case does not support the broad proposition urged by the defendant. … Brown v. Lundell, 162 Tex. 84 , 344 S.W. 2d 863 ; Miller v. Crown Central Petroleum Corp., Tex. Civ. App., 309 S.W. 2d 876 , no wr. hist. An accurate analysis of Warren v. Martin is contained in Weaver v. Red, Tex. Civ.

Monsanto Co. v. Cornerstones Municipal Utility District

37 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 199 · Texas Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1993

In Guaranty Petroleum Corp. v. … Allen Sales & Servicenter, Inc. v.

Pns Stores, Inc., D/B/A MacFrugal's Bargain Closeouts D/B/A MacFrugals, Inc. v. Anna E. Rivera as Next Friend for Rachel Rivera

55 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1400 · Texas Supreme Court · Aug 31, 2012

Co. v. Joachim, 315 S.W.3d 860, 863 (Tex. 2010) (quoting Browning, 165 S.W.3d at 346). … Browning, 165 S.W.3d at 348 (alteration in original) (quoting Alexander v. Hagerdorn, 226 S.W.2d 996, 998 (Tex. 1950)).

Federal Sign v. Texas Southern University

951 S.W.2d 401 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1997

See Stone v. Arizona Highway Comm’n, 93 Ariz. 384 , 381 P.2d 107, 109 (1963); Brown v. Wichita State Univ., 217 Kan. 279 , 540 P.2d 66, 84-86 (1975); Todd v. Board of Educ. … Stat. § 16.007 (establishing a Claims Board to hear breach of contract claims against the state with the only remedy of proposing a private bill to the legislature).

American Liberty Insurance Company v. Ranzau

15 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 357 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1972

The court of civil appeals here followed Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York v. … Board is ineffective.

Calvert v. Hull

15 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 173 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1972

Terrell v. Middleton, 187 S.W. 367 , Tex.Civ.App. 1916, writ refused with concurring per curiam opinion, 108 Tex. 14 , 191 S.W. 1138 . … Taylor v. Hudgins, 43 Tex. 244 (1875); Hodges v. Roberts, 74 Tex. 517 , 12 S.W. 222 (1889). No specific suggestion is made as to how this equitable lien would be foreclosed.

Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Conley

260 S.W. 561 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1924

W. 222 ; Gilmore v. Houston Electric Co., 46 Tex. Civ. App. 315 , 102 S. W. 168 ; Schaff v. Gordon (Tex. Civ. App.) 214 S. W. 638 ; Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. Brown (Tex. Civ. App.) 205 S. W. 378 . … For cases of this character, see Levy v. Campbell (Tex. Sup.) 19 S. W. 438 ; G., C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Brown, 16 Tex. Civ. App. 53 , 40 S. W. 608 ; Pecos & N. T. Ry. Co. v. Trower, 61 Tex. Civ. App. 53 , 130 S.

Texas Indemnity Insurance v. Clark

125 Tex. 96 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1935

In the case of Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Burnett, 283 S. … W., 857 , Aetna Life Insurance Company v. Palmer, 286 S. W., 283 , in which writ of error was refused, and London Guaranty & Accident Company v. Smith, 290 *100 S.