Case law

McNeil v. O'Connor

79 Tex. 227 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1891

Chamblee v. Tarbox, 27 Texas, 139 ; Robertson v. Du Bose, 76 Texas, 1 . … The boards created by subsequent acts to detect fraudulent land certificates were required to re-examine the rights of those who held certificates issued by former boards, and to ascertain whether they had been issued to

Arnold v. State

71 Tex. 239 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1888

This cause presents essentially the same facts presented in the case of Smisson v. … AIL the officers made members of the Land Board were of the executive department, and the duties imposed on that Board were such as pertain to that department.

Sanborn v. Schuler

86 Tex. 116 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1893

On application for writ of error applicant insists, that the decision is contrary to the rulings made in many cases, and especially in the decisons in Edwards v. Brown and Patty v. Middleton. … Brown, 68 Texas, 329 , and Patty v. Middleton, 82 Texas, 586 . The motion to reconsider will be overruled. Motion overruled.

White v. City of San Antonio

94 Tex. 313 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1901

Board of Health (Mich.), 74 N. W. Rep., 734 .; Gilboy v. Detroit, 115 Mich., 121 ; Ogg v. Lansing, 35 Iowa, 495 ; Bryant v. St. Paul (Mich.), 21 Cent. L. J., 33. … The case relied upon to sustain their ruling is Haag v. Board of Commissioners, 60 Indiana, 511.

Massey v. Armco Steel Co.

26 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 438 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1983

Reed Tool Co. v. Copelin, 610 S.W.2d 736, 739 (Tex.1980); Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co., 108 Tex. 96 , 185 S.W. 556, 560 (1916). … In Texas Department of Corrections v.

Hyundai Motor Company and Hyundai Motor America, Inc. v. Victor Manuel Vasquez, and Brenda Suarez Vasquez, Individually and on Behalf of the Estate of Alyssa Amber Vasquez

Texas Supreme Court · Mar 10, 2006

Brown Jr. Wright Brown & Close Three Riverway Plaza, Suite 600 Houston, TX 77056 Mr. David E. Keltner Jose Henry Brantley & Keltner 675 North Henderson St. Fort Worth, TX 76107 Mr. Michael A. … v.

Honorable Hope Andrade v. Don Venable

55 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 733 · Texas Supreme Court · May 18, 2012

See Brown v. Todd, 53 S.W.3d 297, 302 (Tex. 2001) (“No Texas court has ever recognized that a plaintiff’s status as a voter, without more, confers standing to challenge the lawfulness of governmental acts.”). … Doremus v. Board of Educ. Of the Borough of Hawthorne, 342 U.S. 429, 433 (1952). Moreover, the expenditure cannot be de minimis—it must be significant.

Couts v. Spivey

66 Tex. 267 · Texas Supreme Court · May 18, 1886

upon by appellant against Brown and Horn. … Association v. Cochran, 60 Tex., 620 . The appellant did not by proof establish a prior lien upon the property.

Mendoza v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.

606 S.W.2d 692 · Texas Supreme Court · Sep 12, 1980

On April 1, 1977, the Board refused to modify the previous award. Mendoza then filed suit in district court to obtain a de novo review of the Board’s action. … Gevinson v.

Munday Independent School District v. Knox City Independent School District

152 Tex. 89 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1953

Lake-view Common School Dist. v. County Sch. Board of San Saba County, 38 S.W. 2d 598 ; Wortham Ind. School Dist. v. State, 244 S.W. 2d 838 . … No. 19 v. Taylor County Board, 95-S.W. 2d 472 and Dorchester Independent School District v.

Dawn Nettles v. Gtech Corporation and the Texas Lottery Commission

Texas Supreme Court · Jun 12, 2020

See Brown & Gay, 461 S.W.3d at 123. … Brown & Gay, 461 S.W.3d at 121.

Chitsey v. National Lloyds Insurance Co.

30 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 556 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 8, 1987

He relies upon Board Order 41060 incorporating the provisions of another board order that requires reasonable investigation of claims. … Absent a showing of such conduct, there can be no recovery under Board Order 41454.

Petroleum Casualty Co. v. Webb

127 Tex. 91 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1936

The case upon the face of the record is controlled by Tally v. Texas Employers Insurance Association (Com. App.), 48 S. W. (2d) 988 . … In the recent case of Texas Employers Insurance Association v. Lemons, 125 Texas, 373 , 83 S.

Lott v. King

79 Tex. 292 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1891

In Neyland v. … Babb v. Carroll, 21 Texas, 765 .

Delaware Underwriters & Westchester Fire Insurance v. Brock

109 Tex. 425 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1919

And, if this provision of the policy was not carried out in this spirit and for'this purpose, neither'party is precluded from going to the courts, notwithstanding the agreement to submit their difference to the board of appraisers … Co. v. Brown, 82 Texas, 638 , 18 S.

Berger v. Kirby

105 Tex. 611 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1913

Stat., 1911, art. 3690; Edelstein v. Brown, 100 Texas, 403 . … (Stallcup v. Grigsby [Grigsby v. Reib, anti p.] opinion filed today.) There is no error shown that requires a reversal of the judgments, which we affirm. Affirmed.

Nadine Hamilton, Nee Nadine Lambert v. Selma P. Wilson, M.D.

Texas Supreme Court · Mar 28, 2008

Brown, disputed that breath tests should be used in this manner. But Dr. … Wadewitz v. Montgomery, 951 S.W.2d 464, 466 (Tex. 1997); see also Burrow v.

City of San Antonio v. Fourth Court of Appeals

34 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 804 · Texas Supreme Court · Sep 11, 1991

In Lower Colorado River Authority v. … In our most recent opinion in this area, Cox Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of Trustees, 706 S.W.2d 956 (Tex.1986), we finally held a notice inadequate.

Passel v. Fort Worth Independent School District

12 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 341 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1969

City of Fort Worth v. Craik, Tex.Sup., 411 S.W.2d 541 . … See Article 4642; 1 Ex parte Warfield, 40 Tex.Crim. 413 , 50 S.W. 933 ; Hunt v. Hudgins, Tex.Civ.App., 168 S.W.2d 703 (no writ); Hawks v.

M. M. M., Inc. v. Mitchell

153 Tex. 227 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 3, 1954

the same as whether the respondent-plaintiff could lawfully practice his profession under the circumstances, because, if he could not, he is, and seems admittedly to be, barred from recovery under decisions such as Kadane v. … The decision in Stokes v. Sundermeyer, Tex. Civ. App., 170 S.W. 2d 583 , writ of error refused, does not conflict with our holding.