Case law

State Ex Rel. Osborn v. City of McAllen

127 Tex. 63 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1936

Cas., 924; Hall v. Macon, 147 Ga., 704 , 95 S. E., 248 ; Cordilla v. Pueblo, 34 Colo., 293 , 82 Pac., 594 ; Pensacola v. Southern Bell Tel. Co., 49 Fla., 161 , 37 So., 820 ; 2 Dillon Munic. … As said in Mills v. San Antonio, 65 S.

State of Texas Ex Rel George v. Baker

120 Tex. 307 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1931

Cameron, County Judge, v. Baker (Texas Civ. App.), 13 S. W. (2d) 119 . After canvassing the returns the county judge entered an order declaring the district incorporated as an independent school district. … Cleveland v. Ward, 116 Texas, 1 , 285 S. W., 1063 ; 15 C. J., p. 1134, par. 583; Id., p. 1161, par. 367. These authorities involve the power of courts, but we think the same principle applies here.

Capitol Aggregates, Inc. v. Great American Insurance Co.

10 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 124 · Texas Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1966

Brown, Sparks & Erwin, Will Barber, Austin, for respondent. WALKER, Justice. … Co. v. West Texas Utilities Co., supra; Shell Petroleum Corp v. Tippett, Tex.Civ.App., 103 S.W.2d 448 (wr. ref.).

Miller v. Vance

107 Tex. 485 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1915

by law upon such a board is “to raise to a proper figure the valuation of all1 such property as the board is satisfied is valued too low.” … Rhomberg v. McLaren, 2 Texas Civ. App., 391, 21 S. W., 571 . There is no issue as to the facts in the case, the questions involved being purely questions of law.

Muldoon v. Sternenberg

139 Tex. 22 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1942

Brown surveyed the Nelson, Ellery and Burrell, and Veatch the Brooks, Vickery and Elliott. … Ayers v. Lancaster, 64 Texas 305 ; Maddox v. Turner, 79 Texas 279 , 15 S. W. (2d) 237 ; Groesbeck v. Harris, 82 Texas 411 , 19 S. W. 850 ; Finberg v. Gilbert, 104 Texas 539 , 141 S. W. 82 ; Texas Co. v. Andrada, 52 S.

via Net, U.S. Delivery Systems, Houston, U.S. Delivery Systems, Inc. and Corporate Express, Inc. v. Tig Insurance Company, Inc. and Safety Lights Co.

Texas Supreme Court · Dec 22, 2006

Wagner & Brown, Ltd. v. Horwood , 58 S.W.3d 732, 734-35 (Tex. 2001). … See Wagner & Brown , 58 S.W.3d at 737 ; HECI Exploration Co. v. Neel , 982 S.W.2d 881, 888 (Tex. 1998).

Swan v. State

48 Tex. 120 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1877

(The State v. Kelley, 43 Tex., 667 .) … (Willis v. Owen, 43 Tex., 41 .)

L. Miller & Co. v. Goodman

91 Tex. 41 · Texas Supreme Court · May 17, 1897

BROWN, Associate Justice. … Wrought Iron Range Company v. Johnson, 84 Ga., 754 ; Ware v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company, 92 Ala., 145 ; State v. Indiana & Ohio Oil, etc., Company, 120 Ind., 575 ; Gunn v. White Sew. Mach. Co. (Ark.), 20 S. W.

Clint Independent School District v. Sonia Herrera Marquez, Claudia Garcia, and Alicia Gomez, for and on the Behalf of Their Minor Children

59 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 546 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 1, 2016

Dist. v. … Coal. v. R.R.

Peterson v. Seagraves

94 Tex. 390 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1901

This court had occasion in the case of Wilson v. Vick, 93 Texas, 88 , to consider the effect of these several provisions upon a different- question from that now presented. … In the case of Wilson v. Vick, supra, this court recognized the correctness of the holding by the Court of Civil Appeals of the Fourth District in the case of Kenedy v.

Twin City Fire Insurance Co. v. Cortez

22 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 156 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1978

See Home Indemnity Co. v. Mosqueda, 473 S.W.2d 456 (Tex.1971); Vestal v. Texas Employers Insurance Association, 285 S.W. 1041 (Tex.Com.App.1926, judgmt adopted); Middlebrook v. … In Home Indemnity Co. v.

Martin v. McCarty

74 Tex. 128 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1888

Burleson v. Durham, 46 Texas, 159 . … This ques *135 tion has been discussed in Snyder v.

Embrey v. Royal Insurance Co. of America

43 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 652 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 20, 2000

See Henson v. Southern Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. & Texas Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 17 S.W.3d 652, 653 (Tex.2000). … See Henson v. Estate of Crow, 734 S.W.2d 648, 649 (Tex.1987). But, if the personal representative of an estate participates in the case, the judgment involving the estate may be valid. See Bernstein v.

Higgins v. Rinker

47 Tex. 381 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1877

Richmond, 19 Id., 589, and many others, the views expressed in the opinion of the court in Brown v. Maryland have been sanctioned and approved. … And the court, referring to the difficulty of drawing the line precisely where the commercial power of Congress ends and the power of the State begins, which had been recognized in Brown v.

Austin & Northwestern Railroad v. Cluck

64 L.R.A. 494 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1903

Co., 21 Wash., 119 ; Wanek v. City of Winona, 46 Law. Rep. Ann., 448; Graves v. City of Battle Creek, 95 Mich., 266 ; City of South Bend v. Turner, 156 Ind., 418 ; Brown v. Chicago M. & St. P. Ry. Co., 95 N. W., 153 . … Co. v.

Thurman v. Chandler

125 Tex. 34 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1935

Rosenthal Dry Goods Co. v. Hillebrandt (Com. App), 7. S. W. (2d) 521. … Co. v. Bigham, 90 Texas, 223 , 38 S. W., 162 ; Union Stockyards v. Peeler (Com. *41 App.), 37 S. W. (2d) 126 . In our opinion it cannot be said as a matter of law that J.

Cook v. Houston Direct Navigation Co.

76 Tex. 353 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1890

Evansich v. Railway, 57 Texas, 123 ; Evansich v. Railway, Id., 126 . … Nagle v. Railway, 88 Pa. St., 35. Without any disposition to affirm this doctrine, we need only say we> are not called upon to deny it.

Black v. Baker

130 Tex. 454 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 5, 1938

City of Galveston v. Brown, 28 Texas Civ. App. 274, 67 S. W. 156 . … Harrison v. City of Columbus, 44 Texas 418 ; City of Galveston v. Brown, supra; City of Desdemona v. Wilhite, supra; Faust v. Pope, 132 Mo. App. 287 , 111 S. W. 878 ; 43 Corpus Juris, p. 715, note 25.

Fort Worth Osteopathic Hospital, Inc. v. Reese

47 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 999 · Texas Supreme Court · Aug 27, 2004

See Brown v. Shwarts, 968 S.W.2d 331, 335 (Tex.1998); Krishnan v. Sepulveda, 916 S.W.2d 478, 479-80 (Tex.1995); Pietila v. Crites, 851 S.W.2d 185, 187 (Tex.1993) (per curiam); Blackman v. … Brown, 968 S.W.2d at 335 .

Martinez v. Second Injury Fund of Texas

33 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 470 · Texas Supreme Court · May 9, 1990

As explained in Miears v. Industrial Accident Board, 149 Tex. 270 , 232 S.W.2d 671, 672 (1950), the purpose of this provision was to encourage the employment of persons physically handicapped by previous injuries. … The question as to when notice to the Fund must be given, and as to when the claim against the Fund must be filed was first considered by this court in Industrial Accident Board v.