Case law

Brown v. State

43 Tex. 478 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1875

In the case of Gilleland v. … (See Buck Bray v. The State, 41 Tex., 203 .)

Brown v. Perez

79 Tex. 157 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1890

Giddings conveyed to appellant Brown in 1856. Each of these conveyances was properly recorded. The remaining two-thirds of the land was conveyed to defendants Adams 'and Wickes in 1872. … Appellants had paid taxes thereon for several years, and defendant Brown had at one time leased the land. . One of the subscribing witnesses, Estevan de la Garza, testified that he knew the plaintiff and A.

Hall & Brown Wood Working MacHine Co. v. Brown

82 Tex. 469 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1891

Benj. on Sales, sec. 595; Mowbray v. Cody, 40 Iowa, 604 . The Iowa statute is similar to our Revised Statutes, article 3190a. … Rohrbough v. Leopold, 68 Texas, 259 . We think that the facts alleged, if true—and they must be taken as true—entitle the appellant to a rescission of the contract.

Brown v. Read

33 Tex. 629 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1871

Brown, the defendant below, pleaded in abatement of tbe plaintiff’s action, alleging that at tbe time of the filing of the plaintiff’s petition he was a resident citizen of the county of Hardin, and not subject to be sued

Brown v. Poff

392 S.W.2d 113 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1965

Co. v. Van Zandt, 159 Tex. 178 , 317 S.W.2d 528 .

Twohig v. Brown

85 Tex. 51 · Texas Supreme Court · May 24, 1892

—This suit was brought October 14, 1885, by John Twohig against David Brown and Dan and Anton Oppenlieimer, on a promissory note executed by said Brown to Margaret and P. J. … The information he received was, that Brown’s vendors had title to only one-half of the entire tract, and that Brown was clearly informed of that fact; that Brown knew well “on the day he bought the- land that they had title

Brown v. Martin

19 Tex. 343 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1857

(Mason v. Kleberg & Burleson, 4 Tex. R. 85 ; Hunt v. Wright and wife, 13 Tex. R. 549 ; 1 Starkie’s Ev. 446, (*447.) … A variance in the amount of the note or bond sued on will be fatal, (Pillie v. Moliere, 7 Mart. R. 341 ; *346 Philips’ Ev. Part 1, C. & H. notes, page 686 & 691 ; Adams v. Brown, 4 Litt. R. 7 ; Chitty on Bills, 559.)

Brown v. Wyatt

72 Tex. 60 · Texas Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1888

Brown, on the 12th day of March, 1887, in his attachment suit against W. C. … Brown alone appeals. It is not here claimed that there was any fraud in the case.

Carhart v. Brown

86 Tex. 425 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 22, 1894

Brown, all of Donley County, Texas, have this day entered into a copartnership for the purpose of procuring, fencing, stocking, and operating a stock ranch in Donley County, Texas, and embracing the following territory. … Associate Justice Brown not sitting.

Geiselman v. Brown

30 Tex. 760 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1868

Brown v. Causey

56 Tex. 340 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1882

Brown, 11 Bank. Reg., 568; S. C., 49 Miss., 5 .97; contra, Perkins v. Gay, 3 Bank. Reg., 772; S. C., 1 L. T. B., 221; Beardsley v. Hall, 36 Conn., 270 . … The opinion in Alston v.

Cook v. Brown

45 Tex. 73 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1876

constitutional provision was founded on considerations of public policy outside of the interests of parties to suits, the legislative branch of the Government did nothing to extend it to execution sales; and in the case of Fisk v.

Brown v. McKee

80 Tex. 594 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1891

Brown.

Shaw v. Brown

41 Tex. 446 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1874

(Smith v. Sherwood, 2 Tex., 460 ; Graham v. Roder, 5 Tex., 141 ; Oliver v. Chapman, 15 Tex., 400 ; Kolb v. Bankhead, 18 Tex., 228 ; Hedgepeth v. Robertson, 18 Tex., 858 ; Reed v. Samuels, 22 Tex., 114 ; Neill v.

Brown v. Adams

35 Tex. 447 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1872

Brown v. Collins

77 Tex. 159 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1890

Collins v. Linn & Co. was final and needed only such orders by the County Court as were necessary to give it effect. What, then, was the judgment of the Court of Appeals? … Latham v. Selkirk, 11 Texas, 314 . The lien foreclosed was the landlord's statutory lien upon the goods found on the rented premises.

In Re Perry

45 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 48 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 22, 2001

Section 28 mandates that the Legislative Redistricting Board shall make such an apportionment if the Legislature fails to do so. Id. … TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. Flores, 870 S.W.2d 10, 12 (Tex.1994). We therefore conditionally issue the writ of mandamus. 1 . The plaintiffs are David Brown, David O.

Harper v. Brown

127 Tex. 631 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1936

Robertson, Josie Maddox, joined pro forma by her husband, Willie Maddox, and Willie Harper as next friend of Martha Brown, were plaintiffs. They will be so designated here. … The petition then contains various allegations in behalf of Josie Maddox and by Willie Harper as next friend of Martha Brown, having for their purpose the setting aside of certain deeds theretofore executed by Martha Brown

Mann v. Brown

71 Tex. 241 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1888

In 14 Texas, 601 , Payne v. … Monroe, 326, Kenningham v.

Brown v. State

27 Tex. 335 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1863