Case law

State v. Richardson

126 Tex. 11 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1935

The jurisdiction of the tax assessor and board of equalization is unquestionably exclusive. State v. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co., 263 S. W., 249 . … Brundrett v. Lucas, 194 S. W., 613 ; Rowland v. City of Tyler (Com. App.), 5 S. W. (2d) 756 ; Ramey v. City of Tyler, 45 S. W. (2d) 359 .

Big D Service Co., Inc. v. Climatrol Industries, Inc.

523 S.W.2d 236 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1975

We refuse the application for writ of error here, as we did in Wilson v. Browning Arms Co., 501 S.W.2d 705 (Tex.Civ.App.1973). The action pleaded in each case was for the breach of contract for the sale of goods. … The holding in Wilson v.

Mesquite Independent School District v. Gross

123 Tex. 49 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1934

Geffert v. Yorktown etc., supra; State Line, etc. v. Farwell, etc., supra. … State Line, etc. v. Farwell, etc., supra.

Gonzales v. Adoue & Lobit

94 Tex. 120 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1900

Conv., sec. 103; Brown v. McDonald, 1 Hill’s Ch. Rep. (S. C.), 304. … Brown v. Brown, 61 Texas, 56 , The error committed by the court in the charge complained of was not cured by giving the contradictory charge.

Jud v. City of San Antonio

143 Tex. 303 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1945

alleged to be members of the Pension Board. … Morrow v. Corbin, 122 Texas 553 , 62 S. W. (2d) 641 ; Texas Employers’ Ins. Ass’n. v. Ezell (Com. App.) 14 S. W. (2d) 1018; 11 Tex. Jur. p. 711 et seq., Sec. 9.

Houston Tap & Brazoria Railway Co. v. Randolph

24 Tex. 317 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1859

(Mills v. Martin, 19 Johns. Rep. 7; Norwood v. Cobb, 15 Texas Rep. 500 ; Cox v. Thomas’s Administratrix, 9 Grattan, Rep. 323; Lindsey v. Luckett, 20 Texas Rep. 516 .) … We have an authority against this assumption of power, in the case of Auditorial Board v. Arles.

Francis v. International Service Insurance Co.

20 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 115 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1976

See Vaught v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 413 F.2d 539 (8th Cir. 1969); Higgins v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., 291 Ala. 462 , 282 So.2d 301 (1973); State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. … We recognize that we must hold invalid any Board-approved provision that conflicts with the Act. See Kemp v.

Paradissis v. Royal Indemnity Company

17 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 163 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1974

See Lotspeich *529 v. Chance Vought Aircraft, 369 S.W.2d 705 (Tex.Civ.App.1963, writ ref. n. r. e.) ; Martin v. Consolidated Casualty Ins. Co., 138 F.2d 896 (5th Cir. 1943); Unruh v. … His suit was properly dismissed because he has not pursued his claim for additional medical services through the Board before seeking relief in the District Court. Industrial Accident Board v.

State v. Jackson

376 S.W.2d 341 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1964

Stauffer v. City of San Antonio, 162 Tex. 13 , 344 S.W. 2d 158, 160 ; Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co., 126 Tex. 296 , 83 S.W.2d 935 , 87 S.W.2d 1069 , 99 A.L.R. 1107 , 101 A.L.R. 1393 . … We can think of no better rule to sum up our position in the matter than that quoted in the State’s brief from our opinion in State Board of Insurance v.

Beaumont Pasture Co. v. Preston & Smith

65 Tex. 448 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 12, 1886

act of sale from Joseph Butler to David Brown. … In Hawley v. Bullock, 29 Tex. 216 , a conveyance or authentic act of sale to David Brown, executed on May 8, 1835, before A.

Harris County Water Control & Improvement District No. 39 v. Albright

153 Tex. 94 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1954

unconstitutional by this Court in Deason v. … That this brings the appeal within the second part of the rule is settled by the opinion of this court in Board of Water Engineers et al v. Colorado Municipal Water Dist., 152 Texas 77 , 254 S.W. 2d 369 .

Burch v. City of San Antonio

18 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 192 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1975

Rose v. City of La Porte, 386 S.W.2d 782 (Tex.1965); Forwood v. City of Taylor, supra; City of El Paso v. State ex rel. Town of Ascarate, 209 S.W.2d 989 (Tex.Civ.App.1947, writ ref’d); Yellow Cab Transit Co. v. … Coastal States Gas Producing Co. v. Pate, supra.

Schmick v. Bateman

77 Tex. 326 · Texas Supreme Court · May 20, 1890

of their value, and the money was applied in satisfaction of the judgment rendered in favor of Martin-Brown Company against Ramey and wife. … Stats., arts. 167, 2292; Osborn v. Koenigheim, 57 Texas, 91 . The proposition that all the contracts referred to were only the contracts of Mrs.

Teacher Retirement System v. Duckworth

153 Tex. 141 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1954

Board of Trustees of Seattle Teachers’ Retirement Fund, 192 Wash. 261 , 73 P. 2d 508 ; Dean v. Clarke, 53 Cal. App. 30 , 199 P. 857 ; O’Brien v. New York State Teachers’ Retirement Board, 215 App. … Board of Trustees of Teachers’ Ins. & Retirement Fund, 168 Wis. 238 , 169 N.W. 562, 564 . In City of Dallas v. Hoskins, Texas Civ.

Wynne v. Parke

89 Tex. 413 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1896

V. Andrews, Robert W. Andrews, Maud Andrews and Mrs. L. B. Page, Mrs. S. V. James and Mrs. Ella B. Halsey, in the land sued for, which *415 interests were acquired by Sarah J. … (Skaggs v. Murchison, 65 Texas, 153 .)

San Antonio Independent School District v. Division of World Missions of the Board of Missions of the Methodist Church

341 S.W.2d 896 · Texas Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1960

In City of Belfast v. … See also, In re Harrington's Estate, 151 Neb. 81 , 36 N.W.2d 577 ; First National Bank of Chicago v. American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions, 328 Ill.App. 481 , 66 N.E.2d 446 ; Camden Trust Co. v.

Railroad Commission v. Gulf Energy Exploration Corp.

59 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 309 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 29, 2016

Brown & Gay Eng’g, Inc. v. Olivares, 461 S.W.3d 117, 121 (Tex.2015). … E.g., Ballantyne v.

Browning v. Placke

29 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 33 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1985

In 1982, the Brownings recovered a judgment against Humble Exploration Company, Pat S. Holloway, and others. … Because that action conflicts with Austin Independent School District v.

Bernhardt v. Port Arthur Independent School District

159 Tex. 488 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1959

Evidently the action of the Board was found to have been taken deliberately as the Court relied upon the decision in Lively v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co., 102 Texas 545 , 120 S.W. 852 . In Simkins v. … Port Arthur Independent School District v. Baumer, 64 S.W. 2d 412 , writ dismissed. We recently had occasion in State v.

State Ex Rel. Childress v. County School Trustees

150 Tex. 238 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1951

County Board of School Trustees of Limestone County, et al v. Wilson, et al, 15 S.W. 2d 144 , writ dism.; County School Board of Angelina County, et al v. … No. 48 et al v. County Board of School Trustees et al, 76 S.W. 2d 786 , writ dism.; State ex rel. Lowe et al v. Cadenhead et al, 129 S.W. 2d 743 , writ refused! County Board of School Trustees of Hale County et al v.