Case law

Johnson v. American General Insurance Co.

464 S.W.2d 83 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1971

But for the court to have jurisdiction, the claim sued upon must first have been presented to the Board. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Choate, 126 Tex. 368 , 89 S.W.2d 205 (1936). … Ass’n., 132 Tex. 237 , 123 S.W.2d 322 (1938); Consolidated Underwriters v. Wright, 408 S.W.2d 140 (Tex.Civ.App. 1966, writ ref., n.r.e.); Petray v. Travelers Ins.

Lord v. New York Life Insurance Co.

56 L.R.A. 596 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1902

BROWN, Associate Justice. … Tram Lumber Co., 65 Texas, 225 ; Stephens v. Masterson, 90 Texas, 417 ; Howard v. Perry, 7 Texas, 259 ; Hunt v. Hunt, 119 Mass., 474 ; Kelly v. Maness, 123 N. C., 236 ; Sprouse v. Littlejohn, 22 S. C., 358; Hansell v.

Labadie v. Hawley.

61 Tex. 177 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1884

It is recognized in the following cases: Bell v. Josselyn, 3 Gray, 311 ; Brown v. Lent, 20 Vt., 533 ; Brown, etc., v. Dean, 123 Mass., 269 ; Fish v. Dodge, 4 Denio, 317 ; Denny v. Manhattan Company, 2 Denio, 115 ; S. … C., 5 Denio, 639 ; Reid v. Humber, 49 Ga., 207 ;. Henshaw v. Noble, 7 Ohio St., 232 .

Republic Insurance v. Highland Park Independent School District

129 Tex. 55 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1937

The rendition and the action of the board thereon in all other respects was unquestionably final. State v. Chicago R. I. & G. Ry. Co., (Com. App.) 263 S. W. 249 ; Ramey v. City of Tyler, 45. S. … In the case of State v.

City of Waco v. Conlee Seed Company

12 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 500 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1969

The board of equalization approved the value as assessed, and because it did not increase the value, gave no notice to Conlee. Conlee did not appear before the board or protest the board’s valuation. … In other instances the extent to which the taxpayer availed himself of his remedies before the board is not discussed. Matthews v. City of Fort Worth, supra; City of Sweetwater v. Biard Development Co., supra.

Willis v. Owen

43 Tex. 41 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1875

In the case of Kinney v. Zimpleman, no notice seems to have been taken by the court of this objection. While in the cases of The State v. Bremond, and Hall v. H. & T. C. R. W. … Willis & Brother v. Joseph A. Owen, sheriff, et al., No. 123, appeal from Galveston; M. Kennedy v. John McClane, sheriff, No. 231, appeal from Nueces; M. Kennedy et al. v.

Jody James Farms, JV v. the Altman Group, Inc. and Laurie Diaz

Texas Supreme Court · Aug 12, 2015

See, Simon v. Pfizer, Inc., 398 F.3d 765, 776 (6th Cir. 2005); In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 740 (Tex. 2005); Fyrnetics (Hong Kong) Ltd. v. … Co. v Fed. Crop Ins. Corp. (2006, CA8 Iowa) 440 F3d 992) and (criticized in Monroe v Brown (2003, MD Ala) 256 F Supp 2d 1292) Reimers v Farm Credit Servs. AgCountry (2001, DC ND) 2001 US Dist LEXIS 8388 Dailey v Am.

City of Glen Rose, Texas and the Zoning Board of Adjustments of the City of Glen Rose, Texas v. Ernest and Shirley Reinke

Texas Supreme Court · Sep 17, 2015

OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF GLEN ROSE, TEXAS, Appellants, v. … (3) The undersigned counsel represents the Town of Annetta South in the case of Town of Annetta South, et al. v.

State of Texas v. Mallet L. C. Co.

126 Tex. 392 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1935

City of El Paso, 126 Texas, 86, 85 (2d) 245; Roland v. City of Tyler (Texas Comm. of Appls.), 5 S. W. (2d) 756 ; Druesdow v. Baker (Texas Comm. of Appls.), 229 S. W., 493 ; Duck v. Peeler, 74 Texas, 268 , 11 S. … However, the rule has been declared that if a board of equalization adopts a method that is illegal, arbitrary, or fundamentally wrong, the decision of the board may be attacked and set aside. Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v.

Railroad Commission v. Sterling Oil & Refining Co.

147 Tex. 547 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 16, 1949

See Whiteside v. Brown, Tex. Civ. App., 214 S. W. (2d) 844 ; writ dismissed w. o. j., Fellows v. Eastman, 126 Maine 147 , 136 Atl. 810 ; Cudihee v. Phelps, 76 Wash. 314 , 136 Pac. 367 ; Cooney v. … See Railroad Commission v. Shell Oil Co., Inc., 146 Texas 286 , 206 S. W. (2d) 235 ; Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co., 126 Texas 296 , 83 S. W. (2d) 935 , 87 S. W. (2d) 1069 , 99 A. L. R. 1107, 101 A. L.

Railroad Commission v. Shell Oil Co.

146 Tex. 286 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1947

Brown v. Humble Oil & Ref. Co., 126 Texas 296 , 83 S. W. (2d) 935 , 99 A. L. R. 1107; Corzelius v. Harrell, 143 Texas 509 , 186 S. W. (2d) 961 . … W. (2d) 802 ; Brown v. Humble Oil & Ref. Co., 126 Texas 296 , 83 S. W. (2d) 935 , 99 A. L. R. 1107. The order, when so tested, must appear reasonable and just, and its enforcement feasible and practicable. Corzelius v.

State of Texas v. Ragland Clinic-Hospital

138 Tex. 393 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1942

Fort Worth Cavalry Club v. Sheppard, 125 Texas 339 , 83 S. W. (2d) 660 ; Nichols v. State, 11 Texas Civ. App. 327, 32 S. W. 452 (writ refused); State v. Haldeman, 163 S. W. 1020 (writ refused); State v. … Nichols v. State, 11 Texas Civ. App. 327, 32 S. W. (2d) 452 (writ refused); State v. Perlstein, 79 S. W. (2d) 143 , par. 11; State v. Bank of Missouri, 45 Mo. 528 ; 59 C.

Davis v. City of Lubbock

160 Tex. 38 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1959

Board of Insurance Commissioners v. … White v. Bolner, Texas Civ. App., 223 S.W. 2d 686 (wr. ref.); Southern Canal Co. v. State Board of Water Engineers, 159 Texas 227 , 318 S.W. 2d 619 .

Foster v. Johnson

89 Tex. 640 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1896

Brown October 28, 1872. On April 1, 1878, Brown conveyed the lot by warranty deed to H. B. Stone. … Knolls v. Barnhart, supra; Roberts v. Thorn, 25 Texas, 735 ; Walker v. Read, 59 Texas, 190 .

TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE ASS'N v. Shelton

161 Tex. 259 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1960

While this case differs factually in some respects, yet it is controlled by our opinion handed down this day in Truck Insurance Exchange v. Charles Seelbach, Ante p. 250. … In Traders & General Insurance Co. v. Wilkinson, Texas Civ. App. wr. ref. n.r.e., 261 S.W. 2d 863 , and Texas Employers’ Ins. Ass’n. v. Chancellor, Texas Civ.

in Re Corpus Christi Liquefaction, Llc

Texas Supreme Court · Oct 25, 2019

V, § 3(a). Besides the two express limits on the Legislature’s power—that jurisdiction can only be to issue writs of quo warranto and mandamus, and not against the Governor—we recognized long ago in Love v. … Occidental, 561 S.W.3d at 166–68 (Brown, J., concurring). 8

Foley v. Benedict

122 Tex. 193 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1932

In the case of Wilson v. Board of Education, 233 Ill., 464 , 15 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1136, 84 N. E., 697 , 13 Ann. … For a general discussion of this subject in addition to the authorities above cited, we refer to the following authorities: Splawn v. Woodward, 287 S. W., 677 ; Zucht v. San Antonio School Board (Texas Civ.

Ealey v. Insurance Co. of North America

660 S.W.2d 50 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 20, 1983

We disagree. *52 The requirement of article 8307, § 5 that appeals from Board decisions must be filed within twenty days of giving notice of intention to appeal is a general statute of limitations. Richards v. … Similarly, in Womack Machine Supply Company of Houston v.

Boerner v. Traders' National Bank

90 Tex. 443 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1897

In support of its opinion, the court there say, that “the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania have given the same interpretation to the act of Congress in Brown v. Second Nat’l Bank of Erie, 72 Pa. St., 209.” … The statement of the case shows that the hank sued Brown on certain notes.

Hazzard v. Morrison

104 Tex. 589 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1912

Campbell v. Hough, 73 N. J. Eq., 611; Tobin v. Larkin, 183 Mass., 389 ; Keator v. Brown, 57 N. J. Eq., 600; Melin v. Woolley, 103 Minn., 498 ; Cochran v. Blout, 161 U. S., 350 . … Roberts v. Lovejoy, 60 Texas, 253 ; Goff v. Jones, 70 Texas, 572 ; Pomeroy, Specific Performance, sec. 831 et seq. In Keator v. Brown, 57 N. J.