Case law

McKinney v. Blankenship

154 Tex. 632 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 12, 1955

As to the other defendants, the trial court’s judgment was *636 undoubtedly predicated on the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S. … Brown v.

Duncan, Tax Collector v. Gabler

147 Tex. 229 · Texas Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1948

Brown v. City of Galveston, 97 Texas 1 , 75 S. W. 488 . … In Brown v. Bonougli, 111 Texas 275 , 232 S.

Brown v. Brown

61 Tex. 56 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1884

Brown to the hands of Lavinia Brown; but anything that shows to your satisfaction that D. AT. … In Moore v.

Brown v. Brown

61 Tex. 45 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1884

Munson v. Hallowell, 26 Tex., 486 ; Ripley v. Withee, 27 Tex., 14 ; Anding v. Perkins, 29 Tex., 354 ; Bremond v. McLean, 45 Tex., 11 ; Alston v. Richardson, 51 Tex., 1 . … Henderson v. Pilgrim, 22 Tex., 471 ; Wade on the Law of Notice, sec. 34.

Brown v. Brown

71 Tex. 355 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 9, 1888

B'd of Adj'm't of City of Ft. Worth v. Stovall

147 Tex. 366 · Texas Supreme Court · Jan 5, 1949

In other cases it has likewise been assumed that boards of adjustments are proper parties. See Harrington v. Board of Adjustment, 124 S. W. (2d) 401 (Tex. Civ. App., writ of error refused); Board of Adjustment v. … R. 207; State v. Zoning Board of Appeal and Adjustment, 198 La. 766 , 4 So. (2d) 822 ; State v. Zoning Board of Appeal and Adjustment, 198 La. 758 , 4 So. (2d) 820 ; see 4 C.

Geo. Seligson & Co. v. Brown & Brown

61 Tex. 180 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1884

We do not, however, undertake to decide whether or not any application of these notes would have saved the sale to Brown & Brown from being held fraudulent. … Avery v. Johann, 27 Wis., 246 ; Green v. Gantum, 19 N. J. Eq., 105; Gregory v. Harrington, 33 Vt., 241 . It has been held to the contrary in Mississippi (Farmers’ Bank v.

State v. Brown

51 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1254 · Texas Supreme Court · Aug 29, 2008

Brown v. State, 984 S.W.2d 348, 349 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth 1999, pet. denied). On appeal, Brown renewed his complaints about the third amended petition. Id. … See Stevens v. Nat’l Educ. Ctrs., Inc., 11 S.W.3d 185, 186 (Tex.2000); Horrocks v. Tex.

Brown v. Todd

53 S.W.3d 297 · Texas Supreme Court · Aug 23, 2001

Co. v. … V.

Steve Huynh, Individually Yvonne Huynh, Individually Huynh Poultry Farm, LLC D/B/A Steve Thi Huynh Poultry Farm D/B/A Huynh Poultry Farm T & N Poultry Farm, LLC Thinh Bao Nguyen, Individually Timmy Huynh Poultry Farm Timmy Huynh, Individually And Sanderson Farms, Inc. v. Frank Blanchard, Angelia Snow, Tanya Berry, Kimberly Riley, John Miller, Amy Miller, Chad Martinez, Emily Martinez, Mersini Blanchard, Malakoff Properties, LLC, and Ronny Snow

Texas Supreme Court · Jun 7, 2024

Campbell v. Wilder, 487 S.W.3d 146, 152 (Tex. 2016) (quoting Repka v. Am. Nat. Ins. Co., 186 S.W.2d 977, 980 (Tex. 1945)). II. … (quoting Brown v. Petrolite Corp., 965 F.2d 38, 51 (5th Cir. 1992))). In my view, the Court’s analysis strays from a proper balancing of the equities in two important respects.

James v. Brown

25 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 432 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1982

In City of Houston v. … Brown, Hall, and Rosen-thal could not have been arrived at properly during their brief periods of observation.

Johnson v. Brown

51 Tex. 65 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1879

Brown and others, as the heirs at law of J. W. Warren, upon the ground that the will was a forgery. It was attested by D. E. … (Brown v. The State, 28 Tex., 200 ; Parrish v. The State, 45 Tex., 55 ; Sparks v. Dawson, 47 Tex., 147 .)

Brown v. Reese

67 Tex. 318 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1887

(Signed) James Brown, Oo. Judge.” … (Cyrus v. Hicks, 20 Texas, 483 .)

Brown v. Sullivan

71 Tex. 470 · Texas Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1888

(Railway v. Murphy, 46 Texas, 356 ; Railway v. Spicker, 61 Texas, 427 ; Railway v. Cowser, 57 Texas, 293 .) … The judgment in this case, as in that of Brown, Receiver v. Brown, decided at a former day of this term, attempts to make the recovery a lien upon the earnings, etc., of the railroad in the hands of the receiver.

Hicks v. Brown

136 Tex. 399 · Texas Supreme Court · May 28, 1941

Defendant in error, Edna Brown, sustained personal injuries in a collision at a street intersection in Amarillo between two taxicabs. … Horton & Horton v. House, supra; Schumacher Co. v. Shooter, 132 Texas 560 , 124 S.

Brown v. Clippinger

113 Tex. 364 · Texas Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1923

Brown and others. Plaintiff in error R, A. … The judgment which Brown sought to vacate recited facts which sustained the court’s jurisdiction. It could not therefore be collaterally attacked with success in the courts of this state. Levy v.

Brown v. Ruse

69 Tex. 589 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1888

(Brown v. Reese, 67 Texas, 318 .) Nothing was there shown except the claim and its endorsement. … “James Brown, “County Judge.”

Stone v. Brown

54 Tex. 330 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1881

Brown, the president of the bank. … July 9, 1869, creating commissioners of appeal, it is held that this last named act in effect merely provided for a board of referees or arbitrators.

Brown v. Mitchell

36 L.R.A. 64 · Texas Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1895

Brown. … Brown.

Brown v. Cole

155 Tex. 624 · Texas Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1956

Fowler v. Hults, 138 Texas 636 , 161 S.W. 2d 478 ; Lewis v. Davis, 145 Texas 468 , 199 S.W. 2d 146 . The fact that Brown also became a purchaser and a participant does not ipso facto prevent his being a seller. … Lewis v. Bicker, 235 Mich. 656 , 209 N.W. 832 ; Chambers v. Beckwith, 247 Mich. 255 , 225 N.W. 605 ; Thompson v. Cain, 226 Mich. 609 , 198 N.W. 249 .